切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2008, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (02) : 124 -127. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2008.02.010

论著

乳腺良性肿块切除方式的选择
杨振林1,(), 崔广和1, 王希龙1, 贾中明1, 韩勇1, 毕晔1   
  1. 1.256603 滨州,山东省滨州医学院附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-22 出版日期:2008-04-01
  • 通信作者: 杨振林

Surgery selection of breast benign tumor excision

Zhen-lin YANG1,(), Guang-he CUI1, Xi-long WANG1, Zhong-ming JIA1, Yong HAN1, Ye BI1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou 256603, China
  • Received:2007-10-22 Published:2008-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhen-lin YANG
引用本文:

杨振林, 崔广和, 王希龙, 贾中明, 韩勇, 毕晔. 乳腺良性肿块切除方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2008, 02(02): 124-127.

Zhen-lin YANG, Guang-he CUI, Xi-long WANG, Zhong-ming JIA, Yong HAN, Ye BI. Surgery selection of breast benign tumor excision[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2008, 02(02): 124-127.

目的

比较传统切除术和B超引导下Mammotome微创旋切术在切除乳房良性肿块的差别,为患者提供比较合理的手术方式。

方法

将我院2006年6月至2007年6月收治的231例乳房良性肿块患者,分为传统手术切除组(133例)和B超引导下Mammotome微创旋切术组(98例),比较两组的年龄、肿块大小、术中出血量、切口长度、一次切除肿块个数、手术时间、花费、术后并发症。

结果

和传统手术组相比,Mammotome微创旋切手术切口短、出血少,一次切除肿块多,术后并发症少,手术时间短但花费多。

结论

对于乳房内肿块直径<3 cm、多发性肿块的年轻患者建议选择Mammotome微创旋切手术,传统手术适用于年龄较大、肿块直径≥3 cm或经济条件较差的患者。

Objective

To compare the difference in the excision breast benign tumor between traditional excision method and ultrasound guided Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy technique,provide reasonable excision way for patients.

Methods

From June,2006 to June.2007,31 cases who suffered from benign tumor of breast were divided into traditional group(133 cases)and ultrasound guided Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy group (98 cases),compared their differences such as age, mass size, bleeding volume, incision length, the mass number removed by one operation, period time of operation, cost of treatment and postoperative complications.

Results

Ultrasound guided Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy had the following advantages:the incision were shorter,less bleeding,more mass quantity removed, period of operation and postoperative complications were less, but the expense of treatment were higher.

Conclusion

The young female,breast tumor diameter<3 cm with more mass are suggested to choose ultrasound guided Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy technique,traditional excision operation is applied to elder,tumor diameter>3 cm as well as disadvantaged patients.

图1 同侧乳腺常规手术切口和Mammotome切口的对比
图2 B超引导下将Mammotome旋切刀的旋切窗凹槽对准病灶
表1 两组患者临床观察指标的比较
表2 两组患者并发症发生情况的比较(例)
1
董立鹏,张晓康,车毅,等.乳晕周围环状切口切除多发性乳腺纤维瘤.中华整形外科杂志,2001,17(2):121-123.
2
王先明,何劲松,郭良峰,等.人性化美容切口在乳房手术中的应用.中国现代手术学杂志,2003,7(6):409-412.
3
Meloni GB, Dessole S, Becchere MP, et al. Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2001,18(5):520-524.
4
Chun K,Velanovich V.Patient-perceived cosmesis and satisfaction after breast biopsy:comparison of stereotactic incisional,excisional,and wire-localized biopsy techniques.Surgery,2002,131(5):497-501.
5
Zuiani C,Mazzarella F,Londero V,et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy:results,follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion. Radiol Med(Torino),2007,112(2):304-317.
6
Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, et al. Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance.Am J Surg,2002,184(4):332-336.
7
Fine RE,Whitworth PW,Kim JA,et al.Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device.Am J Surg, 2003, 186(4):362-367.
8
徐纪海,崔明,刘嘉,等.Mammotome 旋切系统治疗乳腺良性肿块304 例疗效观察.山东医药,2007,47(6):49-50.
9
陈杏出,尹红.乳腺良性病变治疗方法的选择.中国现代手术学杂志,2006,10(4):276-277.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[11] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[12] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[13] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[14] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[15] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
阅读次数
全文


摘要