切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 30 -32. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2009.02.010

论著

小肝癌射频消融与手术切除的疗效比较
步向阳1, 王一1,(), 葛忠1, 王占春1, 张东生1   
  1. 1.266071 青岛,山东省青岛市市立医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-04 出版日期:2009-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王一
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市卫生局科研立项(2004-wsxk003)

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small primary liver carcinoma

Xiang-yang BU1, Yi WANG1,(), Zhong GE1, Zhan-chun WANG1, Dong-sheng ZHANG1   

  1. 1.Hepatobiliary surgery department of Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Shandong 266071,China
  • Received:2007-03-04 Published:2009-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi WANG
引用本文:

步向阳, 王一, 葛忠, 王占春, 张东生. 小肝癌射频消融与手术切除的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2009, 03(02): 30-32.

Xiang-yang BU, Yi WANG, Zhong GE, Zhan-chun WANG, Dong-sheng ZHANG. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small primary liver carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2009, 03(02): 30-32.

目的

比较手术切除和射频消融治疗小肝癌(≤5 cm)的临床疗效。

方法

88例小肝癌患者,手术切除42例,射频消融46例,分析临床资料及随访结果。

结果

全组平均随访34.36(6~72)个月。手术组与射频组总1、3、5年无瘤生存率为85.4%、40.9%、29.2%vs 82.6%、27.7%、16.4%,平均无瘤生存时间32.78个月vs 29.39个月(P=0.51),总累积生存率为100%、63.7%、50.4%vs 100%、66.3%、37.4%。平均生存时间50.78个月vs 47.62个月(P=0.67)。肿瘤≤3 cm组中,手术组与射频组1、3、5年无瘤生存率为85.7%、62.5%、37.5%vs 85.0%、37.4%、29.9%(P=0.50),累积生存率为100%、78.8%、59.1%vs 100%、78.8%、51.7%(P=0.87)。肿瘤3~5 cm组中,手术组与射频组1、3、5年无瘤生存率为85.7%、30.6%、30.0% vs 80.8%、21.8%、10.9%(P=0.58),累积生存率为100%、56.8%、45.4%vs 100%、56.9%、29.1%(P=0.41)。Cox多因素分析显示肿瘤个数对总体生存期的影响有统计学意义(P=0.02),但消除各因素可能引起的影响后,手术和射频两组总体无瘤生存期和总体生存期差别均无统计学意义。

结论

对直径≤5 cm的小肝癌射频消融安全、疗效确切,近远期疗效与手术切除相近,可以考虑作为小肝癌的首选治疗手段之一。

Objective

To compare clinical results of surgical resection(SR)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for small primary liver carcinoma (≤5 cm).

Methods

Eighty-eight patients received surgical resection(42 cases)and radiofrequency ablation (46 cases),and the long-time results were analyzed.

Results

With mean follow-up time 34.36 (6-72)months,the 1,3,5-year disease free survival rates in SR and RFA group were 85.4%,40.9%,29.2%vs 82.6%,27.7%,16.4%,the mean disease free survival time were 32.78 vs 29.39 months (P=0.51).When the tumor diameter≤3 cm, the 1,3,5-year disease free survival rates in SR and RFA group were 85.7%,62.5%,37.5%vs 85.0%,37.4%,29.9%(P=0.50).when the tumor diameter in 3-5 cm,The 1,3,5-year disease free survival rates in SR and RFA group were 85.7%,30.6%,30.0%vs 80.8%,21.8%,10.9%(P=0.58).The 1,3,5-year cumulative survival rates in SR and RFA group were 100%,63.7%,50.4%vs 100%,66.3%,37.4%,the mean cumulative survival time were 50.78 vs 47.62 months(P=0.67).When the tumor diameter≤3 cm,The 1,3,5-year cumulative survival rates in SR and RFA group were 100%,78.8%,59.1%vs 100%,78.8%,51.7%(P=0.87).When the tumor diameter in 3-5 cm,the 1,3,5-year cumulative survival rates in SR and RFA group were 100%,56.8%,45.4%vs 100%,56.9%,29.1%(P=0.41).After balance the multiple factors'effect,Cox results showed the difference of disease free survival rates and cumulative survival rates between SR and RFA was statistically not significant,but the tumor number was significantly effect the survival time (P=0.02).

Conclusion

Radiofreqency ablation is a safe and satisfactory treatment for small liver carcinoma(≤5 cm)with short and long-time results that similar to surgicalresection,which can be selected to smallliver carcinoma as one of the first-line treatments.

表1 手术组和射频组两组患者一般情况比较(例)
1
吴在德, 吴肇汉. 外科学.6 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003.542-543.
2
黄洁夫. 肝脏胆道肿瘤外科学.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1999.401-403.
3
中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会.原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准.中华肝脏病杂志,2001,9(6):324.
4
陈敏山,李锦清,梁惠宏,等.经皮射频消融与手术切除治疗小肝癌的疗效比较.中华医学杂志,2005,85(2):80-83.
5
李立新,叶胜龙,杨毕伟,等.射频及手术切除在小肝癌治疗中价值的探讨.中国临床医学,2004,11(6):1011-1013.
6
Hong SN,Lee SY,Choi MS,et al.Comparing the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgery in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma and well-preserved hepatic function.JC lin Gastroenterol,2005,39(3):247-252.
7
Ikeda K, Kobayashi M, Saitoh S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation and surgical therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma of 3cm or less in diameter.Hepatolo Res,2005,33(3):241-249.
8
Vivarelli M, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, et al. Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(1): 102-107.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 余新水, 沈佳宇, 巨积辉. 皮瓣联合掌长肌腱折叠单排三点式固定治疗指背侧创面伴锤状指畸形的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 485-490.
[2] 王强, 金光哲, 巨积辉, 王凯, 唐晓强, 吕文涛, 程贺云, 杨林, 王海龙. 超声辅助定位下游离臂内侧皮瓣在修复手指创面中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 393-397.
[3] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[4] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[7] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[8] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[9] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[10] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[11] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[12] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[13] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[14] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要