切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 350 -354. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2010.04.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

癌组织K-ras基因突变、术前血清CEA水平与结直肠癌临床病理特点的关系
吴文辉1, 汤友珍2, 肖隆斌1,(), 蔡世荣3, 何裕隆3, 詹文华3   
  1. 1. 510700 广州,中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区普外科
    2. 510700 广州,中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区预防保健科
    3. 中山大学附属第一医院胃肠胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-05 出版日期:2010-08-01
  • 通信作者: 肖隆斌
  • 基金资助:
    广州市黄埔科技计划资助项目(2009031)

Detection of K-ras gene mutations in cancer tissues, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in serums of patients with colorectal cancer and their correlation with clinical pathological characteristics

Wen-hui WU1, You-zhen TANG2, Long-bin XIAO1,(), Shi-rong CAI3, Yu-long HE3, Wen-hua ZHAN3   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Huangpu Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510700, China
  • Received:2010-01-05 Published:2010-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Long-bin XIAO
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: XIAO Long-bin, Email:
引用本文:

吴文辉, 汤友珍, 肖隆斌, 蔡世荣, 何裕隆, 詹文华. 癌组织K-ras基因突变、术前血清CEA水平与结直肠癌临床病理特点的关系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2010, 04(04): 350-354.

Wen-hui WU, You-zhen TANG, Long-bin XIAO, Shi-rong CAI, Yu-long HE, Wen-hua ZHAN. Detection of K-ras gene mutations in cancer tissues, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in serums of patients with colorectal cancer and their correlation with clinical pathological characteristics[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2010, 04(04): 350-354.

目的

观察结直肠癌组织中K-ras基因突变情况,术前检测患者血清CEA水平,探讨两者与结直肠癌临床病理的关系。

方法

应用实时荧光定量PCR方法和基因测序技术检测100例结直肠癌组织中K-ras基因12、13密码子突变情况,化学发光法检测患者血清CEA水平,结合其临床病理资料进行统计学分析。

结果

K-ras基因突变者39例(39.0%),其中12号密码子突变31例,13号密码子突变8例。有淋巴结转移者K-ras基因突变率(57.8%)明显高于无淋巴结转移者(23.6%),有肝脏转移者K-ras基因突变率(62.5%)明显高于无肝转移者(34.5%),TNM分期Ⅲ、Ⅳ期K-ras基因突变率(56.5%)明显高于Ⅰ、Ⅱ期(24.1%)。K-ras基因突变率与肿瘤大小、部位、肿瘤浸润深度、分化程度无密切关系。49例CEA水平超出正常范围(49.0%)。有淋巴结转移或肝转移患者CEA水平显著高于无淋巴结或肝转移患者(P<0.05)。在肿瘤不同的临床病理分期(Duke's、TNM分期)间CEA水平差异有统计学意义,Duke's D期和TNM Ⅲ、Ⅳ期出现高阳性率。CEA水平在肿瘤不同浸润深度、体积及分化程度上无明显差异。

结论

癌组织K-ras基因突变和血清CEA水平超出正常水平预示结直肠癌可能合并淋巴结转移或肝转移,是预后不良的指标。

Objective

To detect mutations of K-ras gene in cancer tissues and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in serums of patients with colorectal cancer, and to find out their correlation with clinical pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Methods

The specimens of 100 patients with colorectal cancer were collected. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and DNA sequencing were performed in these tissues to detect K-ras gene mutations at codon 12th and codon 13th, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in serums were evaluated by radioimmunoassay, the results were analyzed with patients' clinical pathological data.

Results

Thirty-nine cases (39.0%) were detected pointmutation, and 31(31.0%)cases were found pointmutation at codon 12th, eight cases(8.0%) at codon 13th. The rate of K-ras gene mutation in cases with metastatic lymph nodes(57.8%) was higher than that in cases with no metastatic lymph node(23.6%). The mutation rate in cases with liver metastasis(62.5%) was higher than that in cases without liver metastasis(34.5%), P<0.05. And significant differences were found between TNM III, IV(56.5%) and TNM I, II(24.1%). There were no closely relationship with size, location, invasive depth and differentiation extent of tumor. CEA levels in 49 patients were positive (more than 5μg/L). Patients with lymph node or liver metastasis had a high lever of CEA. The positive rate of CEA level in patients with liver/lymph node metastasis was 75% and 73.3% respectively, which was higher than that in patients without liver/lymph node metastasis(44%, 29.1%), P<0.05. Significant differences between Duke′s stages/TNM stages were found with high positive rate in the groups of Duke′s D stage and TNM III, IV stages. CEA levels had no relationship with size, location, invasive depth or differentiation extent of tumor.

Conclusion

K-ras gene mutation and CEA level are closely associated with liver and/or lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. They are negative prognostic factors of colorectal cancer.

图1 野生型K-ras基因实时荧光PCR扩增产物荧光曲线图
图2 突变型K-ras基因实时荧光PCR扩增产物荧光曲线图
表1 K-ras基因突变与临床病理特征关系(例)
图3 野生型K-ras基因第12、13密码子基因序列分别为GGT、GGC
图4 K-ras基因12密码子GGT突变为GAT
图5 K-ras基因12密码子GGT突变为GTT
图6 K-ras基因13密码子GGC突变为GAC
1
Lievre A, Bachatte J-B, Blige V,et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(10):374-379.
2
Amado IG, Wolf M, Peters M,et al. Wild-type KRAS is requaired for panitunumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(10):1626-1634.
3
蔡三军,徐瑞华,郑树,等.结直肠癌的监测//NCCN结肠癌临床实践指南(中国版)专家组. NCCN结肠癌临床实践指南(中国版). 2009: 6.
4
Dabritz J, Hanfler J, Preston R,et al. Detection of Ki-ras mutations in tissue and plasma samples of patients with pancreatic cancer using PNA-mediated PCR clamping and hybridization probes. Br J Cancer,2005,92(2):405-412.
5
Doolittle BR, Emannel J, Tuttle C,et al. Detection of the mutated K-ras biomarker in colorectal carcinoma.Exp Mol Pathol,2001,70(3):289-301.
6
Pajkos G, Kiss I, Sandor J,et al. The prognostic value of the presence of mutations at codons 12,13,61 of K-ras oncogene in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res,2000,20(3A):1695-1702.
7
Dieterle CP, Conzelmann M, Linnemann U,et al. Detection of isolated tumor cells by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism for K-ras mutation in tissue samples of 199 colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res,2004,10(2):641-650.
8
高枫,唐卫中,李卫.中国人散发性大肠癌K-ras基因突变的研究.中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(1):65-67.
9
Wu CM, Tang R, Wang JY,et al. Frequence and spectrum of K-ras codons 12 and 13 mutations in colorectal adenocarcinomas from Taiwan. Cancer Genet Cytogenet,2005,158(1):55-60.
10
吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学. 7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008: 1564-1565.
[1] 罗青杉, 梅海涛, 郝家领, 蔡锦锋, 周润楷, 温玉刚. 连接蛋白43通过调控细胞周期抑制结直肠癌的增殖机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 344-349.
[2] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[3] 黄莹, 李璇, 刘梦杨, 彭桂林, 徐鑫, 韦兵, 杨超. 靶向联合治疗双肺移植术后KRAS和BRAF基因双突变晚期肺腺癌一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 298-301.
[4] 赖淼, 景鑫, 李桂珍, 李怡. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR 突变亚型的临床病理和预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 731-737.
[5] 刘文竹, 唐窈, 刘付臣. 诱导多潜能干细胞在神经肌肉疾病研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 367-373.
[6] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[7] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[8] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[11] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[12] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[13] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[14] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[15] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
阅读次数
全文


摘要