切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 102 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.02.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

小鼠肝脏应用解剖及标准肝部分切除模型的建立
周健1, 郭志勇1, 鞠卫强1, 焦兴元1, 王小平1, 韩明1, 胡安斌1, 巫林伟1, 袁小鹏1, 马毅1, 朱晓峰1, 何晓顺1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-16 出版日期:2014-04-01
  • 通信作者: 何晓顺

Application anatomy of the liver and establishment of standard partial hepatectomy model in mice

Jian Zhou1, Zhiyong Guo1, Weiqiang Ju1, Xingyuan Jiao1, Xiaoping Wang1, Ming Han1, Anbin Hu1, Linwei Wu1, Xiaopeng Yuan1, Yi Ma1, Xiaofeng Zhu1, Xiaoshun He1,()   

  1. 1. Organ Transplantation Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2013-01-16 Published:2014-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoshun He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Xiaoshun, Email:
引用本文:

周健, 郭志勇, 鞠卫强, 焦兴元, 王小平, 韩明, 胡安斌, 巫林伟, 袁小鹏, 马毅, 朱晓峰, 何晓顺. 小鼠肝脏应用解剖及标准肝部分切除模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 08(02): 102-105.

Jian Zhou, Zhiyong Guo, Weiqiang Ju, Xingyuan Jiao, Xiaoping Wang, Ming Han, Anbin Hu, Linwei Wu, Xiaopeng Yuan, Yi Ma, Xiaofeng Zhu, Xiaoshun He. Application anatomy of the liver and establishment of standard partial hepatectomy model in mice[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 08(02): 102-105.

目的

观测C57BL/6J小鼠肝脏的解剖及建立70%、90%标准肝部分切除模型。

方法

60只成年SPF级C57BL/6J小鼠随机分3组。A组小鼠称量体质量、全肝质量及各肝叶质量,计算全肝质量/体质量比、70%和90%肝比例。采用直视下分步单纯丝线结扎肝脏解剖功能单位后再切除肝叶的方法,B组行70%肝切除;C组行90%肝切除。观察术后动物生存情况。

结果

小鼠全肝质量为(1.325±0.029)g,体质量为(26.5±1.14)g,左外侧叶质量为(0.433±0.041)g,中叶为(0.411±0.035)g,右前叶为(0.140±0.011)g,右后叶为(0.175±0.015)g,尾状叶为(0.099±0.006)g,全肝质量/体质量比为(4.92±0.13)%。肝左外侧叶与中叶之和约占全肝比重的70%;仅剩余尾状叶则切除肝比重约为90%。B组和C组手术成功率为100%,B组术后1周动物存活率为100%,C组术后1 d存活率为30%(6/20),2 d存活率为0。

结论

本研究首次明确小鼠各肝叶比例。采用直视下分步单纯丝线结扎肝脏解剖功能单位后再切除肝叶的方法,极易建立稳定、可靠的小鼠70%和90%标准肝部分切除模型。

Objective

To observe anatomy of liver and establish 70% and 90% standard partial hepatectomy model in C57BL/6J mice.

Methods

Sixty adult mice with a C57BL/6J SPF stage were randomly equably divided into three groups, group A, group B and group C. Weight of body, total liver, and every single liver lobe were weighed in group A, ratio of total liver weight/body weight, and proportion of 70% and 90% liver was calculated, respectively. 70% partial hepatectomy in group B and 90% partial hepatectomy in group C were performed, using step by step visually ligaturing anatomic functional unit of liver by only threads.

Results

The weight of total liver, body, left lateral lobe, median lobe, right anterior lobe, right posterior lobe and caudate lobe in mice were (1.325±0.029) g, (26.500±1.140) g, (0.433±0.041) g, (0.411±0.035) g, (0.140±0.011) g, (0.175±0.015) g, (0.099±0.006) g, respectively, the ratio of total liver weight/body weight was (4.92±0.13)%, the weight of left lateral lobe and median lobe accounted for 70% of the whole liver, and the weight of other parts except caudate lobe preserved was 90%. The successful operation rate in both group B and C was 100%. The survival rate was 100% one week after operation in group B, 30% (6/20) one day after operation in group C, respectively, and no survival in group C two days after operation.

Conclusions

This study ascertains the proportion of every liver lobe in mice for the first time. Using step by step visually ligaturing anatomic functional unit of liver by only threads, it is easy to establish stable and credible 70% and 90% partial hepatectomy model in mice.

图1 小鼠肝脏解剖示意图和丝线结扎位置及顺序
表1 20只A组小鼠的肝叶质量及占全肝体质量的比例
图2 小鼠肝脏离体解剖分叶及肝叶比例观察
1
Yang J, Li Y, Wu L, et al. NDRG2 in rat liver regeneration: role in proliferation and apoptosis[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2010, 18(5): 524-531.
2
Bergmann A, Steller H. Apoptosis, stem cells, and tissue regeneration[J]. Sci Signal, 2010, 3(145): re8.
3
Duncan AW, Dorrell C, Grompe M. Stem cells and liver regeneration[J]. Gastroenterology, 2009, 137(2): 466-481.
4
Streetz KL, Luedde T, Manns MP, et al. Interleukin 6 and liver regeneration[J]. Gut, 2000, 47(2): 309-312.
5
Martins, PN, Theruvath TP, Neuhaus P. Rodent models of partial hepatectomies[J]. Liver Int, 2008, 28(1): 3-11.
6
Kogure K, Ishizaki M, Nemoto M, et al. A comparative study of the anatomy of rat and human livers[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1999, 6(2): 171-175.
7
Mitchell C, Nivison M, Jackson LF, et al. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor links hepatocyte priming with cell cycle progression during liver regeneration[J]. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280(4): 2562-2568.
8
史冀华,朱盛兴,张水军. 大鼠肝部分切除术的应用解剖及实施[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2008, 16(22): 2516-2520.
9
Martins PN, Neuhaus P. Hepatic lobectomy and segmentectomy models using microsurgical techniques[J]. Microsurgery, 2008, 28(3): 187-191.
10
Gaub J, Iversen J. Rat liver regeneration after 90% partial hepatectomy[J]. Hepatology, 1984, 4(5): 902-904.
11
Bucher NL. Regeneration of mammalian liver[J]. Int Rev Cytol, 1963, 15: 245-300.
12
Iakova P, Awad SS, Timchenko NA. Aging reduces proliferative capacities of liver by switching pathways of C/EBPalpha growth arrest[J]. Cell, 2003, 113(4): 495-506.
13
Desbois-Mouthon C, Wendum D, Cadoret A, et al. Hepatocyte proliferation during liver regeneration is impaired in mice with liver-specific IGF-1R knockout[J]. FASEB J, 2006, 20(6): 773-775.
14
Heijboer AC, Donga E, Voshol PJ, et al. Sixteen hours of fasting differentially affects hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity in mice[J]. J Lipid Res, 2005, 46(3): 582-588.
15
DeAngelis RA, Markiewski MM, Taub R, et al. A high-fat diet impairs liver regeneration in C57BL/6 mice through overexpression of the NF-kappaB inhibitor, IkappaBalpha[J]. Hepatology, 2005, 42(5): 1148-1157.
16
Matsuo T, Yamaguchi S, Mitsui S, et al. Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5643): 255-259.
17
Tanaka K, Ogura Y. "Smal1-for-size graft" and "smal1-for-size syndrome" in living donor liver transplantation[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2004, 45(6): 1089-1094.
[1] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[4] 郑鹏, 吴赛萍, 谢秀璋, 史庆丰. 术前预测感染性肾结石列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 299-306.
[5] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[6] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 贾成朋, 王代宏, 陈华, 孙备. 可切除性胰腺癌预后术前预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-570.
[10] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[11] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[12] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[13] 王淑友, 宋晓晶, 贾术永, 王广军, 张维波. 肝脏去唾液酸糖蛋白受体靶向活体荧光成像评估酒精性肝损伤肝脏功能的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 443-446.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要