切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 124 -128. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2015.02.010

论著

内镜逆行胆胰管造影术处理心脏死亡器官捐献供体肝移植受体术后胆道狭窄临床分析
邓斐文1, 陈焕伟1,(), 甄作均1, 苏树英2, 费凛2, 计勇1   
  1. 1.528000 佛山市第一人民医院肝脏外科
    2.528000 佛山市第一人民医院胆道外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-13 出版日期:2015-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈焕伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金资助项目(A2014697)佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(2014AB00263)佛山市卫生局医学科研项目(2014029)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation with donation after cardiac death

Feiwen Deng1, Huanwei Chen1,(), Zuojun Zhen1, Shuying Su2, Lin Fei2, Yong Ji1   

  1. 1.Department of Liver Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
    2.Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2014-10-13 Published:2015-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Huanwei Chen
引用本文:

邓斐文, 陈焕伟, 甄作均, 苏树英, 费凛, 计勇. 内镜逆行胆胰管造影术处理心脏死亡器官捐献供体肝移植受体术后胆道狭窄临床分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2015, 09(02): 124-128.

Feiwen Deng, Huanwei Chen, Zuojun Zhen, Shuying Su, Lin Fei, Yong Ji. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation with donation after cardiac death[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(02): 124-128.

目的

探讨内镜逆行胆胰管造影技术(ERCP)在心脏死亡器官捐献供体(DCD)肝移植术后胆道狭窄治疗中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2011 年9 月至2014 年6 月接受DCD 肝移植手术治疗的34 例肝移植受体的临床资料。

结果

磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)作为诊断肝移植术后胆道狭窄的标准方法,34 例DCD 肝移植术后发生胆道狭窄8 例,发生率为23.53%,其中2 例为吻合口狭窄,胆道狭窄组的肝移植等待时间明显长于非胆道狭窄组[(72.5 ± 86.0) d vs(14.4 ± 30.1) d,U=40.0,P=0.01]。 1 例自行再通,7 例接受ERCP 胆道内支架置入均获成功,ERCP术后并发胰腺炎4 例(57.14%),胆管炎1 例(14.29%)和胆管炎合并肝脓肿1 例(14.3%)。

结论

胆道狭窄是DCD 肝移植术后常见并发症,MRCP 是诊断肝移植术后胆道狭窄的重要非有创性检查手段,ERCP 胆道内支架置入是处理肝移植术后胆道狭窄的有效治疗方式,仍需进一步观察ERCP的疗效。

Objective

To explore the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)in the treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation with donation after cardiac death (DCD).

Methods

The clinical data of thirty-four patients undergoing liver transplantation between September 2011 and June 2014 in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) was the standard method for the diagnosis of biliary stricture after liver transplantation. The biliary stricture incidence rate after liver transplantation with DCD was 23.53% (8/34), including two cases of anastomotic stricture, and 6 cases of non-anastomotic stricture. The waiting time for liver transplantation in the biliary stricture group was longer compared with that in the non biliary stricture group[(72.5±86.0) d vs (14.4±30.1) d, U=40.0, P=0.01]. One biliary stricture case recovered to normal without any intervention. Seven liver transplant recipients with biliary stricture were cured successfully by placing biliary tract stent through ERCP. The complications after ERCP was acute pancreatitis in 4 cases(4/7, 57.14%), 1 case with cholangitis (1/7, 14.29%) and 1 case with combined cholangitis and hepatic abscess (1/7, 14.29%).

Conclusions

Biliary stricture is the common complication after liver transplantation with DCD, while MRCP is an importantly noninvasive detective method for the diagnosis of biliary stricture after liver transplantation. Placing biliary tract stent through ERCP is the effective treatment for the biliary stricture after liver transplantation. Its curative effect for the biliary stricture needs further investigation.

表1 34 例DCD 肝移植受体术后发生胆道狭窄情况比较
表2 两组器官捐献供体临床特点
表3 34 例肝移植受体术中及术后情况(Mann-Whitney U 检验,)
1
陈规划. 再谈肝移植术后胆道并发症的防治[J]. 器官移植,2014,5(1): 1-3.
2
Poley JW, Lekkerkerker MN, Metselaar HJ, et al. Clinical outcome of progressive stenting in patients with anastomotic strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation[J]. Endoscopy, 2013, 45(7): 567-570.
3
孙强, 余云龙, 胡泽民, 等. 心脏死亡供体肝移植12 例初步经验[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献: 电子版, 2014, 8(4): 290-293.
4
Stadnik A, Cieszanowski A, Maj E, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: The role of MR imaging using different hydrographic sequences in patients with biliary-enteric and ductto-duct biliary anastomosis[J]. Ann Transpl, 2013, 18(10): 460-470.
5
Arain MA, Attam R, Freeman ML. Advances in endoscopic management of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2013, 19(5): 482-498.
6
Husing A, Cicinnati VR, Beckebaum S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: valuable tool for diagnosis of biliary complications in liver transplant recipients?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, Aug 27. [Epub a-head of print]
7
Kinner S, Dechene A, Ladd SC, et al. Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation[J]. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20(7): 1749-1756.
8
Jorgensen JE, Waljee AK, Volk ML, et al. Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,73(5): 955-962.
9
Pecchi A, De Santis M, Di Benedetto F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in biliary complications of orthotopic liver transplantation[J]. Radiol Med, 2010, 115(7): 1065-1079.
10
易述红, 蔡常洁, 陆敏强, 等. 肝移植术胆道重建选择胆肠吻合术的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献: 电子版, 2007, 1(3): 154-157.
11
Chan CH, Donnellan F, Byrne MF, et al. Response to endoscopic therapy for biliary anastomotic strictures in deceased versus living donor liver transplantation[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int,2013, 12(5): 488-493.
12
Cai XB, Zhu F, Wen JJ, et al. Endoscopic treatment for biliary stricture after orthotopic liver transplantation: success, recurrence and their influencing factors[J]. J Dig Dis, 2012, 13(12): 642-648.
13
Sanna C, Giordanino C, Giono I, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with postliver transplant biliary complications: results of a cohort study with long-term follow-up[J]. Gut Liver, 2011, 5(3): 328-334.
14
Kobayashi N, Kubota K, Shimamura T, et al. Complications of the treatment of endoscopic biliary strictures developing after liver transplantation[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011, 18(2): 202-210.
15
Balderramo D, Sendino O, Burrel M, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant recipients with anastomotic biliary strictures: a case-control study[J]. Liver Transpl, 2012,18(4): 482-489.
16
Buxbaum JL, Biggins SW, Bagatelos KC, et al. Predictors of endoscopic treatment outcomes in the management of biliary problems after liver transplantation at a high-volume academic center[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2011, 73(1): 37-44.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[3] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[6] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[7] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[8] 袁园园, 岳乐淇, 张华兴, 武艳, 李全海. 间充质干细胞在呼吸系统疾病模型中肺组织分布及治疗机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 374-381.
[9] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[10] 国文凯, 纪鹏程, 毕靖茹, 谢院生. IgA 肾病的十种治疗措施[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 327-333.
[11] 帖璇, 苏晓乐, 王利华. 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 345-351.
[12] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[15] 王昌前, 林婷婷, 宁雨露, 王颖杰, 谭文勇. 光免疫治疗在肿瘤领域的临床应用新进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 575-583.
阅读次数
全文


摘要