切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 231 -235. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.04.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

肠内免疫微生态营养、免疫增强型肠内营养对治疗重症急性胰腺炎患者的比较研究
谢小华1,(), 章莉2()   
  1. 1. 635150 达州,四川省宣汉县人民医院消化内科
    2. 635150 达州,四川省宣汉县人民医院营养科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-16 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 谢小华, 章莉

Comparative study of enteral ecoimmunonutrition and immune enhanced enteral nutrition in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis

Xiaohua Xie1(), Li Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Xuanhan People’s Hospital, Dazhou 635150, China
    2. Department of Nutriology, Xuanhan People’s Hospital, Dazhou 635150, China
  • Received:2017-04-16 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaohua Xie, Li Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Li, Email:
引用本文:

谢小华, 章莉. 肠内免疫微生态营养、免疫增强型肠内营养对治疗重症急性胰腺炎患者的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 231-235.

Xiaohua Xie, Li Zhang. Comparative study of enteral ecoimmunonutrition and immune enhanced enteral nutrition in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 231-235.

目的

对比分析肠内免疫微生态营养、免疫增强型肠内营养对重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)疗效、大便菌群变化情况、预后与营养状态的影响。

方法

选择2015年6月至2016年12月宣化县人民医院收治的SAP患者96例,随机分为EE组(给予肠内免疫微生态营养)和IE组(给予免疫增强型肠内营养),每组48例,并选择同期单纯因严重腹胀无法进行早期肠内营养支持的SAP患者24例,设为对照组。对比三组患者干预前以及干预后1周、2周时疗效指标(血清白蛋白、淀粉酶AMS、白细胞计数)、营养状况指标(前白蛋白PAB、转铁蛋白TRF)、发病7~10 d后大便菌群变化情况(菌群失调发生率),2周后观察并分析各组肠内营养治疗中不良反应、并发症发生情况。

结果

(1)干预治疗后第1、2周组内对比三组血清白蛋白、淀粉酶、白细胞水平低于干预前,EE组白细胞计数、AMS恢复时间低于IE组,两组低于对照组,其中第1周时EE、IE组白蛋白水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)EE、IE组干预后1~2周的前白蛋白水平均高于对照组,但两组差异无统计学意义;EE、IE组干预后1~2周的TRF差异无统计学意义,干预后1周时的TRF均高于对照组(P<0.05)。(3)干预7~10 d后,EE组大便菌群涂片检查菌群失调发生率低于IE组和对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.315、5.679,P=0.021、0.017)。(4)EE、IE组各类并发症发生率、严重并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义,其中严重并发症合计发生率均低于对照组(χ2=12.255、10.867,P=0.000、0.001),三组均未见死亡与不良反应。

结论

对SAP患者建议早期实施合理的肠内营养治疗,特别是肠内免疫微生态营养治疗,有助于改善肠道微生态环境,降低并发症发生风险。

Objective

To compare the effects of enteral immune, enteral ecoimmunonutrition (EE), immune enhanced enteral nutrition (IE) on the efficacy, stool flora, prognosis and nutritional status in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

Methods

From June 2015 to December 2016, ninety six patients with SAP were randomly divided into EE group and IE group, with 48 cases in each group. Meanwhile, 24 patients with SAP who were unable to undergo early enteral nutrition support due to severe abdominal distension during the same period were selected as control group. Comparison indexes of the three groups before and after intervention for 1 week and 2 weeks included efficacy indicators (serum albumin, amylase, white blood cell count), nutritional status index (albumin, transferrin) and the pathogenesis of 7-10 d after the fecal flora changes (dysbacteriosis incidence). After 2 weeks, side reactions, complications and adverse prognosis were observed and analyzed.

Results

(1) 1 week and 2 weeks after intervention, serum albumin, amylase, WBC level of the three groups were lower than that before the intervention. White blood cell count, AMS recovery time in EE group were lower than those in the IE group, the two groups both lower than that in the control group. At the first week, the levels of albumin in EE and IE groups were lower than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (2) The levels of prealbumin in EE and IE groups were higher than those in the control group at 1-2 weeks after intervention, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in TRF between EE and IE group at 1-2 weeks after intervention, and the TRF at the first week was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). (3) 7-10 days after the intervention, the incidence of bacterial flora in stool smear of EE group was lower than that in IE group and control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.315, 5.679, P=0.021, 0.017). (4) The incidence of complications and the total incidence of severe complications in EE and IE group were not statistically significant, and the total incidence of serious complications was lower than that of the control group (χ2=12.255, 10.867, P=0.000, 0.001), and no deaths or adverse reactions occurred in the three groups.

Conclusion

For patients with SAP, it is suggested that early enteral nutrition therapy, especially enteral immune micronutrition therapy, can help improve the microenvironment of the intestinal tract and reduce the risk of complications.

表1 三组SAP患者干预前后血清白蛋白、淀粉酶、白细胞水平对比(±s
表2 三组SAP患者干预前后前白蛋白、转铁蛋白水平对比(±s
表3 三组SAP患者严重并发症发生情况对比[n(%)]
[1]
中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺病学组. 急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(1):4-7.
[2]
石志敬,刘虹,张勇勇, 等. 肠内营养启动时机对重症急性胰腺炎预后影响的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学电子杂志, 2015, 8(2):77-83.
[3]
崔熙娟,李小妹,乔丽娜, 等. 早期肠内营养促进重症急性胰腺炎预后效果的系统评价[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2013, 13(8):536-538.
[4]
谢春玲,胡志成,唐冰, 等. 急性胰腺炎患者肠外营养和肠内营养治疗的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 5(5):425-431.
[5]
Babu RY, Gupta R, Kang M, et al. Predictors of surgery in patients with severe acute pancreatitis managed by the step-up approach[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(4):737e50.
[6]
Oresanya LB, Lyons WL, Finlayson E. Preoperative assessment of the older patient: a narrative review[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(20):2110-2120.
[7]
Olivares J, Ayala L, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Assessment of risk factors and test performance on malnutrition prevalence at admission using four different screening tools[J]. Nutr Hosp, 2014, 29(3):674-680.
[8]
黄秋芬,邓卓娟,毕晓霞, 等. 精氨酸强化肠外营养对结直肠癌患者免疫功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2016, 37(2):151-152.
[9]
Cereda E, Klersy C, Pedrolli C, et al. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index predicts hospital length of stay and in-hospital weight loss in elderly patients[J]. Clin Nutr, 2015, 34(1):74-78.
[10]
Munk T, Beck AM, Holst M, et al. Positive effect of protein-supplemented hospital food on protein intake in patients at nutritional risk: a randomised controlled trial[J]. J Hum Nutr Diet, 2014, 27(2):122-132.
[11]
梁国瑞,王影,张董, 等. 谷氨酰胺强化营养治疗在临床中的应用[J]. 临床合理用药, 2015, 8(1):172-173.
[12]
Dhaliwal R, Cahill N, Lemieux M, et al. The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013: an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies[J]. Nutr Clin Pract, 2014, 29(1):29-43.
[13]
李宁. 补充性肠外营养[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2015, 22(1):2.
[14]
黄辉. 我国重症急性胰腺炎死亡原因Meta分析[D]. 贵州: 遵义医学院, 2014: 1-2.
[15]
张金良,陈强谱. 重症急性胰腺炎患者应用肠内营养和肠外营养所致并发症的比较:系统回顾和Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 5(3):259-264.
[16]
West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, et al. Understanding opti-mal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with centralvascular ligation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(15):1763-1769.
[17]
康凯,舒晓亮,姬舒荣, 等. 低氮低热量肠外营养对腹部手术病人疗效及预后影响的Meta分析[J].肠外与肠内营养, 2013, 20(6):332-337.
[18]
丁水生. 重症急性胰腺炎治疗中预防性应用抗生素的Meta分析[J]. 数理易学杂志, 2016, 29(7):1007-1008.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[4] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[7] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[8] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[9] 史清泉, 苗彬, 王烁, 陶琳, 沈晨. miR-181a-5p 靶向ATG5 抑制雨蛙素诱导的大鼠胰腺腺泡细胞AR42J自噬的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 524-530.
[10] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[11] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[12] 杨爽, 余宏亮, 谢敏. CT 与超声检查对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 541-544.
[13] 丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.
[14] 商倩, 罗静, 卓振山, 苗园园, 吴静, 廖振林. 通腑泻浊法联合生长抑素对内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 437-441.
[15] 宋燕秋, 戚桂艳, 杨双双, 周萍. 重症急性胰腺炎肠道菌群特征及早期肠内营养联合微生态制剂治疗的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 442-447.
阅读次数
全文


摘要