切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 114 -118. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

单孔和多孔腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较
倪殿军1,(), 倪卫娟1, 孙霞1   
  1. 1. 518109 深圳市龙华区人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-30 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 倪殿军

Comparison of single-port and multiple-port laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision in the treatment of low rectal cancer

Dianjun Ni1,(), Weijuan Ni1, Xia Sun1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the People's Hospital of Longhua District, Shenzhen 518109, China
  • Received:2018-05-30 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Dianjun Ni
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ni Dianjun, Email:
引用本文:

倪殿军, 倪卫娟, 孙霞. 单孔和多孔腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 114-118.

Dianjun Ni, Weijuan Ni, Xia Sun. Comparison of single-port and multiple-port laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision in the treatment of low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 114-118.

目的

探讨单孔和多孔腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗低位直肠癌对肛肠动力学及炎性因子的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2015年4月至2017年7月深圳市龙华区人民医院收治的84例低位直肠癌患者,根据治疗方案不同分为两组,其中单孔组40例,采用单孔腹腔镜辅助TaTME治疗;多孔组44例,采用传统多孔腹腔镜辅助TaTME治疗。观察和对比两组患者的各项围手术期指标、手术前后肛肠动力学指标以及血清炎性因子的变化情况。

结果

(1)单孔组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后肛门排气时间、拔除引流管时间、下床活动时间以及总住院时间等围手术期指标均显著优于多孔组(P<0.05)。(2)与术前相比,两组患者术后15 d的肛管静息压(ARP)、肛管最大收缩压(MSP)、直肠最大耐受容量(MTV)、高压区长度(HPZ)均显著降低,而直肠静息压(RRP)、直肠肛管抑制反射阈值(AIRT)水平显著升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多孔组术后15 d的ARP、MSP、MTV、HPZ的水平显著低于单孔组(P<0.05),而RRP、AIRT水平则显著高于单孔组(P<0.05)。(3)手术前单孔组与多孔组血清炎性因子白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-8、血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)与C反应蛋白(CRP)等水平比较,差异无统计学意义。术后两组患者的相关血清炎性因子等水平均出现显著上升(P<0.05),其中多孔组患者的血清因子水平均显著高于单孔组患者(P<0.05)。

结论

与传统多孔腹腔镜相比,单孔腹腔镜辅助TaTME治疗低位直肠癌对患者的肛肠动力学以及炎性因子水平的影响更小,可以明显改善手术治疗效果,值得进一步推广。

Objective

To compare the effects of single-port and multiple-port laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) on the anorectal dynamics and inflammatory factors in the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of eighty-four patients with low rectal cancer admitted to the People's Hospital of Longhua District from April 2015 to July 2017 was carried out and they were divided into single-port group (40 cases, treated with single-port laparoscopic TaTME) and multiple-port group (44 cases, treated traditional porous laparoscope-assisted TaTME). The perioperative indexes, preoperative anorectal dynamic indexes and levels of serum inflammatory factors between the two groups were observed and compared.

Results

(1) The perioperative indexes of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, number of lymph node dissection, postoperative anus exhaust time, removal of drainage tube time, bed activity time and total hospitalization time of the single-port group were significantly better than those of the multiple-port group (all P<0.05). (2) Compared with preoperative levels, the ARP, MSP, MTV and HPZ decreased significantly at 15 d after operation, and the levels of RRP and AIRT increased significantly, the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The levels of ARP, MSP, MTV and HPZ in the multiple-port group at 15 d after operation were significantly lower than those in the single-port group (P<0.05), while RRP and AIRT levels were significantly higher (P<0.05). (3) There were no significant differences in serum inflammatory factors such as IL-6, IL-8, SAA, TNF-α and CRP between the two groups before operation. After operation, the levels of serum inflammatory factors in the two groups were both significantly increased (P<0.05), of which the multiple-port group was significantly higher than that in the single-port group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with conventional multiple-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopic assisted TaTME can obviously improve surgical treatment for low rectal cancer, while the influences on anorectal motility and inflammatory factor levels are smaller, and is worthy of further promotion.

表1 两组低位直肠癌患者的一般资料比较
表2 两组低位直肠癌患者手术指标情况比较(±s
表3 两组低位直肠癌患者手术前后肛肠动力学指标变化(±s
表4 两组低位直肠癌患者的血清炎性因子水平变化(±s
[1]
Rasulov AO,Mamedli ZZ,Gordeyev SS, et al. Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer[J]. Tech coloproctol, 2016, 20(4): 227-234.
[2]
邱辉,忠肖毅,徐徕, 等. 经肛门内镜联合腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除治疗低位直肠癌的安全性和可行性[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(1): 41-44.
[3]
栾学荣,杜新明,谢红强, 等. 部分盲肠壁埋于皮下的改良盲肠造口在低位直肠癌保肛中的应用[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 399-401.
[4]
Zuo ZG,Zhang XF,Wang H, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesoreetal excision[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(9): e2988.
[5]
陆昌运,李裕永,卢挺斌, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗低位直肠癌的效果对比[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(5): 465-477.
[6]
赵坤,杨筱玲,陶红发, 等. 单孔腹腔镜下TaTME术治疗直肠癌临床效果分析[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2017, 20(2): 140-142.
[7]
康亮,张兴伟. 单孔腹腔镜辅助下经肛低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 106.
[8]
张庆彤,刘亚莉,张旭, 等. 减孔与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(3): 276-280.
[9]
张志鹏,姚宏伟,陈宁, 等. 腹腔镜辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(7): 695-700.
[10]
杨盈赤,金岚,张忠涛. 完全经肛门全直肠系膜切除8例报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(8): 850-856.
[11]
Chen CC,Lai YL,Jiang JK, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemomdiation: a matched case control study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(4): 1169-1176.
[12]
徐洪彪. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠全系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床对比探讨[J]. 中国医药指南, 2016, 14(5): 69-70.
[13]
康亮,陈文豪,蔡永华, 等. 单孔腹腔镜辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除临床应用价值及展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(1):71-74.
[14]
Deijen CL,Velthuis S,Tsai A, et al. COLOR: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(8): 3210-3215.
[15]
张忠涛. 完全经肛门全直肠系膜切除—腹腔镜直肠癌手术未来的方向[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(8): 844-846.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[13] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[14] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要