切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 202 -207. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.03.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

联合应用利胆排石药物治疗胆总管细小结石可行性分析
刘立民1, 张宗明1,(), 张翀1, 刘卓1, 于宏伟1, 朱明文1   
  1. 1. 100073 首都医科大学北京电力医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-05 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张宗明
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科技重大专项生物医药与生命科学创新培育研究(Z171100000417056)

Feasibility analysis of treating small choledocholithiasis with combination of choleretic and stone-removal drugs

Limin Liu1, Zongming Zhang1,(), Chong Zhang1, Zhuo Liu1, Hongwei Yu1, Mingwen Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China
  • Received:2018-09-05 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zongming Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Zongming, Email:
引用本文:

刘立民, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘卓, 于宏伟, 朱明文. 联合应用利胆排石药物治疗胆总管细小结石可行性分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 202-207.

Limin Liu, Zongming Zhang, Chong Zhang, Zhuo Liu, Hongwei Yu, Mingwen Zhu. Feasibility analysis of treating small choledocholithiasis with combination of choleretic and stone-removal drugs[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 202-207.

目的

探讨联合应用利胆、排石药物对胆总管细小结石的治疗作用,以期提高其非手术治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年11月至2018年1月北京电力医院联合应用利胆(33%硫酸镁)、排石(颠茄片、山莨菪碱)药物治疗41例胆总管细小结石(直径≤8 mm,数量≤3个)患者的临床资料。

结果

41例患者排石成功率为73.17%(30/41),其中排石成功组30例(合并急性胆囊炎2例,6.67%),排石数量为1~3(1.1±0.4)个,排石时间为3~16(6.0±3.7) d,住院时间为3~23(12.7±5.2) d,排石失败组11例(合并急性胆囊炎5例,45.45%),排石数量为1~2(1.2±0.4)个,排石时间为5~14(9.4±3.5)d,住院时间为10~23(15.8±4.1)d,两组排石数量及住院时间对比,差异无统计学意义(t=0.086,P=0.032;t=2.014,P=0.051),但排石失败组合并急性胆囊炎比例较高,排石时间明显延长(χ2=6.033,P=0.024;t=2.522,P=0.016)。排石成功组患者排石后的肝功能指标如丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBil)、结合胆红素(DBil)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP),均较排石前显著降低(t=3.369、4.957、5.112、5.231、2.264、2.422,均P<0.05)。随访6~18个月,41例患者肝功能正常,均无胆总管结石复发或再生。

结论

联合应用利胆、排石药物可促进胆总管细小结石排入十二指肠,降低手术治疗胆总管细小结石概率,既可作为胆总管细小结石的非手术治疗方法,又可作为胆总管结石的术前准备措施,以期最大限度地简化治疗手段,减轻患者痛苦,减少治疗隐患。

Objective

To explore the therapeutic effects of small choledocholithiasis treated with the combination of choleretic and calculus-removal drugs, so as to improve the effect of non-operative treatment of small choledocholithiasis.

Methods

The clinical data of forty-one patients with common bile duct calculi (diameter≤8 mm, number≤3) treated with choleretic (33% magnesium sulfate) and lithotripsy (belladonna tablets, anisodamine) in Beijing Electric Power Hospital from November 2014 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The successful rate of stone removal in 41 patients was 73.17%(30/41), of which 30 cases (including 2 cases with acute cholecystitis) were successful group, and 11 cases (including 5 cases with acute cholecystitis) were failure group. Comparison of two groups with acute cholecystitis, stone discharge, stone discharge time and hospital stay showed no significant differences in stone discharge [1-3 (1.1±0.4) vs 1-2 (1.2±0.4), t=0.086, P=0.032] and hospital stay [3-23 (12.7±5.2) dvs 10-23 (15.8±4.1) d, t=2.014, P=0.051], while the failure group had a higher proportion of acute cholecystitis (45.45% vs 6.67%, χ2=6.033, P=0.024) and the time of lithotripsy was significantly prolonged [5-14 (9.4±3.5) d vs 3-16 (6.0±3.7) d, t=2.522, P=0.016]. The liver function indexes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil), conjugated bilirubin (DBil), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after lithotripsy in the successful group were significantly lower than those before lithotripsy (t=3.369, 4.957, 5.112, 5.231, 2.264, 2.422; all P<0.05). After 6-18 months of follow-up, all 41 patients had normal liver function and no recurrence or regeneration of common bile duct stones.

Conclusion

The combined administration of choleretic and lithagogue drugs can promote the small choledocholithiasis into duodenum, reduce the chance of surgical treatment of small choledocholithiasis, not only as a non-operative treatment for the small choledocholithiasis, but also as a preoperative preparatory measure for the choledocholithiasis, so as to maximize the simplification of treatment, reduce patient pain, decrease treatment risks and avoid unnecessary surgery.

表1 两组胆总管细小结石患者基本资料的比较
表2 41例胆总管细小结石患者联合应用利胆、排石药物的治疗效果(±s)
表3 联合应用利胆排石药物成功患者排石前后肝功能变化(±s)
图1 排石成功组患者联合应用利胆排石药物排石前后上腹部CT检查 A为治疗前CT横断面可见胆总管结石(箭头所示);B为治疗后CT横断面胆总管结石消失;C为治疗前CT冠状面可见胆总管结石(箭头所示);D为治疗后CT冠状面胆总管结石消失
图2 排石成功组患者联合应用利胆排石药物排石前后MRCP检查 A为治疗前MRCP三维重建可见胆总管结石(箭头所示);B为治疗前MRCP冠状面可见胆总管结石(箭头所示);C为治疗后MRCP冠状面胆总管结石消失
[1]
Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK. Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2014, 86(1): 1-6.

URL    
[2]
张宗明, 苑海明, 张翀. 双镜联合同期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(4): 280-283.
[3]
Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW, et al. International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 83(1): 37-47.
[4]
Nussinson E, Shibli F, Shahbari A. The combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: two stage or single stage management?[J]. Harefuah, 2015, 154(10): 649-652, 675.
[5]
Liu JG, Wang YJ, Shu GM, et al. Laparoscopic versus endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(5): 287-294.
[6]
Sato Y, Okamura S, Nakasono M, et al. Evaluation of serum amylase and gabexate mesilate with endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation[J]. Med Invest, 2007, 54: 65-71.
[7]
张强, 吴硕东, 王伟. 吗啡、山莨菪碱及硫酸镁对Oddi括约肌压力的影响[J]. 解剖科学进展, 2008, 14(2): 161-164.
[8]
周良, 吴国兴. 硫酸镁治疗胆道蛔虫病36例观察[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2001, 30(1): 48.
[9]
金俊哲, 吴硕东, 张强, 等. 山莨菪碱等对Oddi括约肌作用的临床测压研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2002, 2(4): 229-231.
[10]
张展峰, 朱社教. 硫酸镁合用丹参注射液治疗胆绞痛和肾绞痛78例[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2005, 12(2): 96.
[11]
张晨阳, 陈耀, 林斯航. 大剂量硫酸镁治疗胆囊疾病腹痛52例的效果[J]. 右江医学, 2002, 30(5): 443-444.
[12]
杨宝峰. 药理学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005.
[13]
林志彬, 金有豫. 医用药理学基础[M]. 4版. 北京: 世界图书出版公司北京公司, 1998.
[14]
吴林海, 王照东, 耿鑫, 等. 自拟调胆理气汤治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后奥迪氏括约肌功能紊乱的临床研究[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2013, 31(18): 148-149.
[15]
周迈, 郭晏同, 常迎彬, 等. 山莨菪碱和加贝酯对胆总管结石术后胆道动力的影响[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2009, 17(26): 2748-2751.
[16]
李浩航, 汪建初, 罗宗将, 等. 胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石个体化微创治疗初探[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2017, 29(5): 417-419.
[17]
吴孟超, 吴在德. 黄家驷外科学[M]. 7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008.
[18]
冯变喜. 肝胆胰外科理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 2001.
[19]
石继伟. 山莨菪碱对有症状的单个直径≤10 mm胆总管结石排出的促进作用[D]. 承德: 承德医学院, 2017.
[20]
Lefemine V, Morgan RJ. Spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones in jaundiced patients[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2011, 10(2): 209-213.

URL    
[1] 蔡茗, 俞亚红. 胆总管结石术后复发危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 438-442.
[2] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海. BillrothⅡ式胃大部切除术后行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石的体会[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 432-434.
[3] 尼加提江·艾比不拉, 艾尔哈提·胡赛音, 阿依甫汗·阿汗. 胆总管结石内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后行胆道支架置入和鼻胆管引流并发症的比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 46-49.
[4] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[5] 张建波, 东爱华. 不同腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及并发症对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 693-696.
[6] 朱俊杰, 王斌, 刘覃, 蔡志杰. LC联合LCBDE对急性结石性胆囊炎合并胆总管结石的临床疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 458-461.
[7] 韩凤梅, 王颖, 索晶晶. PTCSL与LD治疗胆总管结石的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 207-209.
[8] 马良丰, 马召峰. 腹腔镜胆总管探查治疗胆总管结石胆管闭合方式的选取比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 693-695.
[9] 马涛, 叶春伟, 李志鹏. 输尿管镜碎石术后留置输尿管支架的必要性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 463-467.
[10] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[11] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海, 邓志成. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管汇入部微切开取石在细径胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 422-426.
[12] 姚礼, 吴金秀, 唐流康, 谢峰. 胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 73-76.
[13] 冯其柱, 王思雨, 袁文康, 张超. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合在正常直径胆总管结石患者中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 68-72.
[14] 吴志明, 黄洪军, 孟兴成, 葛佳皓, 沈丽青, 胡常恩, 虞洪. ERAS理念在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 474-478.
[15] 董浩, 张文刚, 刘圣圳, 李笑, 冯宇杰, 王佳凤, 赵晨怡, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 胆道镜直视下胆总管结石取出术的初步探索[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 92-96.
阅读次数
全文


摘要