切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 363 -367. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

3D腹腔镜无切口同期手术治疗高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的疗效分析
杜涛1, 傅传刚1,(), 周主青1, 韩俊毅1, 鲁兵1   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点专科建设项目(PWZZK2017-26); 上海市浦东新区高峰学科建设项目(PWYgf2018-03)

Curative effect analysis of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis

Tao Du1, Chuangang Fu1,(), Zhuqing Zhou1, Junyi Han1, Bing Lu1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Chuangang Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Chuangang, Email:
引用本文:

杜涛, 傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 鲁兵. 3D腹腔镜无切口同期手术治疗高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 363-367.

Tao Du, Chuangang Fu, Zhuqing Zhou, Junyi Han, Bing Lu. Curative effect analysis of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 363-367.

目的

探讨高龄患者3D腹腔镜无切口直肠癌肝转移同期手术的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年3月至2017年3月在同济大学附属东方医院行同期手术治疗的56例高龄直肠癌肝转移患者(≥80岁)的临床资料,其中3D腹腔镜无切口手术43例(无切口组),直肠肿瘤切除采用经直肠腔内拖出式或经直肠腔翻出式,肝脏肿瘤同期切除;开腹手术13例(开腹组),比较两组患者在手术时间、出血量、住院时间、VAS疼痛评分、初次肛门排气时间、初次进食流质时间、淋巴结检出数、下切缘长度、术后并发症以及1年无病生存期(DFS)等方面的差异。

结果

两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.887,P=0.375)。与开腹组患者相比,无切口组患者的平均出血量更少,初次肛门排气时间、初次进食流质时间、术后平均住院时间更短,术后VAS疼痛评分更低,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.841、16.118、12.105、3.803、10.922,均P<0.01)。无切口组9例(20.9%)发生不同程度的术后并发症,其中Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅰ级7例,Ⅱ级2例;开腹组患者术后Ⅰ级并发症3例(23.1%)。两组并发症发生率及严重程度比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=1.342,P=0.180)。无切口组和开腹组标本下切缘长度分别为(3.9±1.3)cm、(4.0±1.7)cm,术后淋巴结检出数分别为(13.1±4.6)枚、(13.5±2.8)枚,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.226、0.296,P=0.835、0.773),术后1年DFS分别为62.8%、61.5%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.007,P=0.935)。

结论

与开腹手术相比,腹部无切口直肠癌肝转移同期手术安全可行,且能减少术后出血量、缩短术后恢复时间并减轻患者疼痛。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis.

Methods

From March 2015 to March 2017, the clinical data of fifty-six cases (aged over eighty) with low rectal cancer and simultaneous liver metastasis operated in the Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-three cases underwent 3D laparoscopy surgery without incision (incision-free group) which was described as transrectal extraction of specimen and transanal endorectal eversion and transection, and thirteen cases underwent open surgery (open group). Liver resection was simultaneously performed for liver metastases. The operation time, amount of bleeding, hospitalization length after operation, VAS pain score, interval to first flatus, interval to first oral intake, postoperative lymph node number, tumor resection margin length, postoperative complication rate and disease free survival (DFS) rate were analyzed between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time (t=1.887, P=0.375). Compared with the open group, the bleeding, interval to first flatus, interval to first oral intake and average hospitalization length after operation were less and VAS scores were lower in incision-free group, the differences were significant (t=7.841, 16.118, 12.105, 3.803, 10.922, all P<0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in nine cases (20.9%) of the incision-free group, including Clavien-Dindo grade in seven cases and grade Ⅱ in two cases, grade complications occurred in three patients (23.1%) in the open group. There was no significant difference in the incidence and severity of complications between the two groups (Z=1.342, P=0.180). The length of lower incision margin in incision-free group and open group were (3.9±1.3) cm and (4.0±1.7) cm,the number of lymph nodes detected after operation were (13.1±4.6) and (13.5±2.8) respectively, with no significant differences (t=0.226, 0.296, P=0.835, 0.773). There was no significant difference in the 1-year DFS between the two groups (62.8% vs 61.5%, χ2=0.007, P=0.935).

Conclusion

Transanal specimen extraction-laparoscopic simultaneous resection in low rectal cancer with liver metastasis is safe and feasible, and may reduce postoperative bleeding, shorten postoperative recovery time and relieve pain of patients.

图1 高龄直肠癌患者肝转移瘤的处理 A为离断肝圆韧带;B为肿瘤边缘0.5 cm做好标记;C为完整切除肿瘤;D为位于肝脏肋缘的肿瘤
图2 直肠原发病灶切除后不同的直肠吻合方法 A为双吻合器法;B为单吻合器法
表1 两组高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的临床资料比较
表2 两组高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组高龄直肠癌同期肝转移患者术后肿瘤学指标比较
[1]
傅传刚,周主青,韩俊毅,等. 中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[2]
邢俊杰,张辰新,杨晓虹,等. 腹部无切口经直肠取出标本的腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术与传统腹腔镜手术近期效果比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 665-670.
[3]
Bentrem DJ, Dematteo RP, Blumgart LH. Surgical therapy for metastaic disease to the liver[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2005, 56: 139-156.
[4]
Kimura F, Miyazaki M, Suwa T, et al. Reduced hepatic acute-phase response after simultaneous resection for gastrointestinal cancer with synchronous liver metastases[J]. Br J Surg, 1996, 83(7): 1002-1006.
[5]
Lin Q, Ye Q, Zhu D, et al. Determinants of long-term outcome in patients undergoing simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e105747.
[6]
傅传刚,韩俊毅. 直肠癌与肝转移灶同时切除的策略与技巧[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 618-620.
[7]
Inoue Y, Hayashi M, Komeda K, et al. Resection margin with anatomic or nonanatomic hepatectomy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(6): 1171-1180.
[8]
Are C, Gonen M, Zazzali K, et al. The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246(2): 295-300.
[9]
Ayez N, Lalmahomed ZS, Eggermont AM, et al. Outcome of microscopic incomplete resection (R1) of colorectal liver metastases in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(5): 1618-1627.
[10]
de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Flores E, et al. R1 resection by necessity for colorectal liver metastases: is it still a contraindication to surgery?[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(4): 626-637.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要