切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 363 -367. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

3D腹腔镜无切口同期手术治疗高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的疗效分析
杜涛1, 傅传刚1,(), 周主青1, 韩俊毅1, 鲁兵1   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点专科建设项目(PWZZK2017-26); 上海市浦东新区高峰学科建设项目(PWYgf2018-03)

Curative effect analysis of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis

Tao Du1, Chuangang Fu1,(), Zhuqing Zhou1, Junyi Han1, Bing Lu1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Chuangang Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Chuangang, Email:
引用本文:

杜涛, 傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 鲁兵. 3D腹腔镜无切口同期手术治疗高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 363-367.

Tao Du, Chuangang Fu, Zhuqing Zhou, Junyi Han, Bing Lu. Curative effect analysis of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 363-367.

目的

探讨高龄患者3D腹腔镜无切口直肠癌肝转移同期手术的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年3月至2017年3月在同济大学附属东方医院行同期手术治疗的56例高龄直肠癌肝转移患者(≥80岁)的临床资料,其中3D腹腔镜无切口手术43例(无切口组),直肠肿瘤切除采用经直肠腔内拖出式或经直肠腔翻出式,肝脏肿瘤同期切除;开腹手术13例(开腹组),比较两组患者在手术时间、出血量、住院时间、VAS疼痛评分、初次肛门排气时间、初次进食流质时间、淋巴结检出数、下切缘长度、术后并发症以及1年无病生存期(DFS)等方面的差异。

结果

两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.887,P=0.375)。与开腹组患者相比,无切口组患者的平均出血量更少,初次肛门排气时间、初次进食流质时间、术后平均住院时间更短,术后VAS疼痛评分更低,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.841、16.118、12.105、3.803、10.922,均P<0.01)。无切口组9例(20.9%)发生不同程度的术后并发症,其中Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅰ级7例,Ⅱ级2例;开腹组患者术后Ⅰ级并发症3例(23.1%)。两组并发症发生率及严重程度比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=1.342,P=0.180)。无切口组和开腹组标本下切缘长度分别为(3.9±1.3)cm、(4.0±1.7)cm,术后淋巴结检出数分别为(13.1±4.6)枚、(13.5±2.8)枚,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.226、0.296,P=0.835、0.773),术后1年DFS分别为62.8%、61.5%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.007,P=0.935)。

结论

与开腹手术相比,腹部无切口直肠癌肝转移同期手术安全可行,且能减少术后出血量、缩短术后恢复时间并减轻患者疼痛。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of 3D laparoscopic incision-free simultaneous resection for elderly patients with rectal cancer and liver metastasis.

Methods

From March 2015 to March 2017, the clinical data of fifty-six cases (aged over eighty) with low rectal cancer and simultaneous liver metastasis operated in the Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-three cases underwent 3D laparoscopy surgery without incision (incision-free group) which was described as transrectal extraction of specimen and transanal endorectal eversion and transection, and thirteen cases underwent open surgery (open group). Liver resection was simultaneously performed for liver metastases. The operation time, amount of bleeding, hospitalization length after operation, VAS pain score, interval to first flatus, interval to first oral intake, postoperative lymph node number, tumor resection margin length, postoperative complication rate and disease free survival (DFS) rate were analyzed between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time (t=1.887, P=0.375). Compared with the open group, the bleeding, interval to first flatus, interval to first oral intake and average hospitalization length after operation were less and VAS scores were lower in incision-free group, the differences were significant (t=7.841, 16.118, 12.105, 3.803, 10.922, all P<0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in nine cases (20.9%) of the incision-free group, including Clavien-Dindo grade in seven cases and grade Ⅱ in two cases, grade complications occurred in three patients (23.1%) in the open group. There was no significant difference in the incidence and severity of complications between the two groups (Z=1.342, P=0.180). The length of lower incision margin in incision-free group and open group were (3.9±1.3) cm and (4.0±1.7) cm,the number of lymph nodes detected after operation were (13.1±4.6) and (13.5±2.8) respectively, with no significant differences (t=0.226, 0.296, P=0.835, 0.773). There was no significant difference in the 1-year DFS between the two groups (62.8% vs 61.5%, χ2=0.007, P=0.935).

Conclusion

Transanal specimen extraction-laparoscopic simultaneous resection in low rectal cancer with liver metastasis is safe and feasible, and may reduce postoperative bleeding, shorten postoperative recovery time and relieve pain of patients.

图1 高龄直肠癌患者肝转移瘤的处理 A为离断肝圆韧带;B为肿瘤边缘0.5 cm做好标记;C为完整切除肿瘤;D为位于肝脏肋缘的肿瘤
图2 直肠原发病灶切除后不同的直肠吻合方法 A为双吻合器法;B为单吻合器法
表1 两组高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的临床资料比较
表2 两组高龄直肠癌肝转移患者的手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组高龄直肠癌同期肝转移患者术后肿瘤学指标比较
[1]
傅传刚,周主青,韩俊毅,等. 中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[2]
邢俊杰,张辰新,杨晓虹,等. 腹部无切口经直肠取出标本的腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术与传统腹腔镜手术近期效果比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 665-670.
[3]
Bentrem DJ, Dematteo RP, Blumgart LH. Surgical therapy for metastaic disease to the liver[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2005, 56: 139-156.
[4]
Kimura F, Miyazaki M, Suwa T, et al. Reduced hepatic acute-phase response after simultaneous resection for gastrointestinal cancer with synchronous liver metastases[J]. Br J Surg, 1996, 83(7): 1002-1006.
[5]
Lin Q, Ye Q, Zhu D, et al. Determinants of long-term outcome in patients undergoing simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e105747.
[6]
傅传刚,韩俊毅. 直肠癌与肝转移灶同时切除的策略与技巧[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 618-620.
[7]
Inoue Y, Hayashi M, Komeda K, et al. Resection margin with anatomic or nonanatomic hepatectomy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(6): 1171-1180.
[8]
Are C, Gonen M, Zazzali K, et al. The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246(2): 295-300.
[9]
Ayez N, Lalmahomed ZS, Eggermont AM, et al. Outcome of microscopic incomplete resection (R1) of colorectal liver metastases in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(5): 1618-1627.
[10]
de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Flores E, et al. R1 resection by necessity for colorectal liver metastases: is it still a contraindication to surgery?[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(4): 626-637.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[13] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[14] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要