切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 372 -376. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.05.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

预防性回肠末端造口术对腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术疗效的影响
蔡彬1, 周廷亮1, 蒋笃均1, 张跃1,()   
  1. 1. 221002 徐州市肿瘤医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-20 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张跃

Effect of prophylactic ileostomy on laparoscopic radical sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer

Bin Cai1, Tingliang Zhou1, Dujun Jiang1, Yue Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, XuzhouCancer Hospital, Xuzhou 221002, China
  • Received:2018-07-20 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yue Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yue, Email:
引用本文:

蔡彬, 周廷亮, 蒋笃均, 张跃. 预防性回肠末端造口术对腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 372-376.

Bin Cai, Tingliang Zhou, Dujun Jiang, Yue Zhang. Effect of prophylactic ileostomy on laparoscopic radical sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 372-376.

目的

探讨预防性回肠末端造口术对腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术患者炎性指标与前白蛋白及肛门功能的影响。

方法

选取2010年9月至2012年6月在徐州市肿瘤医院接受治疗的腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术患者96例,随机分为对照组(常规方式吻合)与观察组(预防性回肠末端造口),各48例。比较两组患者围手术期指标,记录两组患者术后0.5~12个月肛门功能情况以及并发症,生存情况采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

术后5 d时,观察组患者前白蛋白水平较术前及同期对照组水平升高,C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)较术前及同期对照组水平降低,差异均有统计学意义(t=9.236、8.335、9.164,均P<0.05)。观察组患者的肛管静息压、肛管最大收缩压以及直肠最大耐受容量在术后6、9、12个月时均高于同期对照组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组患者术后首次肛门排气时间、排便恢复时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=6.323、5.913、6.135,χ2=7.529,均P<0.05)。两组5年生存率、无进展生存时间、平均生存时间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.349,t=2.475、1.616;P=0.560、0.450、0.329)。

结论

预防性回肠末端造口术可降低腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术患者的炎性反应,明显改善患者肛门功能。

Objective

To investigate the effect of prophylactic ileostomy on inflammatory indexes, prealbumin and anal function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with laparoscopic low rectal cancer radical anal sphincter surgery who were treated in Xuzhou Cancer Hospital from September 2010 to June 2012 were randomly divided into control group (conventional method) and observation group (preventive ileu-endostomy), with 48 cases in each group. The perioperative indicators were compared. The effects of anal function between 0.5-12 months after surgery and complications were recorded, and survival rate by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Compared with the control group, the levels of prealbumin in the observation group increased, and CRP and WBC decreased at the 5th day after operation (t=9.236, 8.335, 9.164, all P<0.05). The resting anal pressure, maximal anal systolic pressure and maximal rectal tolerance volume in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 6, 9 and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The first anal exhaust time, defecation recovery time, hospitalization time and incidence of complications in the observation group were less than those in the control group (t=6.323, 5.913, 6.135, χ2=7.529, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 5-year survival rates, progression-free survival time and mean survival time between the two groups (χ2=0.349, P=0.560; t=2.475, 1.616, P=0.450, 0.329).

Conclusion

Prophylactic distal ileostomy can reduce the inflammatory reaction in patients with laparoscopic low rectal cancer with radical sphincter preserving surgery and significantly improve the anal function of patients.

表1 两组腹腔镜低位直肠癌患者一般资料比较
表2 两组低位直肠癌患者术中情况比较(±s
表3 两组低位直肠癌患者手术前后CRP、WBC及前白蛋白水平比较(各48例)
表4 两组低位直肠癌患者手术前后肛门动力学比较(各48例,±s
表5 两组低位直肠癌患者术后情况比较
[1]
李永坤,张文娟. 预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛术中的应用[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2016, 19(2): 130-131.
[2]
吴凯,喻春钊. 低位直肠癌及其腹腔镜手术特殊性与预防性造口的选择[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(9): 832-835.
[3]
Eto K, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, et al. Comparison of transumbilical and conventional defunctioning ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2016, 36(8): 4139-4144.
[4]
崔伟,陈纲,左富义,等. 预防性末端回肠造瘘对直肠癌保肛手术后转归的影响[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2011, 17(3): 139-141.
[5]
Cipe G, Cengiz MB, Idiz UO, et al. The effects of preoperative endoscopic tattooing on distal surgical margin and ileostomy rates in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A prospective randomized study[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(4): 301-303.
[6]
Wang P, Liang JW, Zhou HT, et al. Surgical specimen extraction via a prophylactic ileostomy procedure: A minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(1): 104-111.
[7]
Liu L, Huang Q, Wang J, et al. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with a new tube ileostomy using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring: A retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(45): e5345.
[8]
赵辉,史益凡,杨增辉,等. 末端回肠悬吊术在腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 19(22): 3741-3744.
[9]
杨卫华,高愫,张松柏. 选择性预防末端回肠造瘘在腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2014, 19(7): 509-511.
[10]
王道荣,李清国,汤东,等. 腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术中改良襻式回肠末端造瘘的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12(5): 362-365.
[11]
高海波,王锋,杨晓东. 预防性末端回肠造瘘在高危因素低位直肠癌保肛手术中的临床应用分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2014, 57(18): 3980-3981.
[12]
张春泽,张雅莉,付文政,等. 生物反馈对低位直肠癌术后排便动力学的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2016, 22(3): 235-238.
[13]
宋新飞,孙威海. 新辅助治疗对直肠癌保肛术后肛门功能和生活能力的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(9): 1857-1859.
[14]
Garg PK. Protective diversion ileostomy in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2017, 225(4): 165-169.
[15]
吴超,汪全新,卢晓明. 腹腔镜改良经肛门结肠肛管吻合术切除低位直肠癌保肛手术的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 437-439.
[16]
徐辉,张汝一,姬清华,等. 低位直肠癌保肛术行回肠造口与单做保肛术的疗效比较[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 55(7): 1082-1084, 1088.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要