切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 14 -18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.01.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

血浆外泌体miR-17-5p和miR-21对乳腺癌的诊断价值
何阳君1,(), 雍伟1, 王维发1, 陈云蛟1, 杨建1   
  1. 1. 610041 成都市第七人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-26 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 何阳君
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科学技术厅项目(2019YFH0146)

Diagnostic value of plasma exosomes miR-17-5p and miR-21 in breast cancer

Yangjun He1,(), Wei Yong1, Weifa Wang1, Yunjiao Chen1, Jian Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Seventh People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2019-02-26 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yangjun He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Yangjun, Email:
引用本文:

何阳君, 雍伟, 王维发, 陈云蛟, 杨建. 血浆外泌体miR-17-5p和miR-21对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 14-18.

Yangjun He, Wei Yong, Weifa Wang, Yunjiao Chen, Jian Yang. Diagnostic value of plasma exosomes miR-17-5p and miR-21 in breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 14-18.

目的

探讨微小RNA-21(miR-21)和miR-17-5p在乳腺癌患者血浆外泌体中的表达水平及其诊断价值。

方法

选取2017年6月至2018年3月于成都市第七人民医院就诊的86例乳腺癌患者为乳腺癌组,选取同期体检健康女性45例为对照组。采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)检测miR-21、miR-17-5p在两组血浆外泌体中的表达水平。根据qRT-PCR检测结果将乳腺癌患者分为miR-17-5p高表达组及低表达组,miR-21高表达组及低表达组,比较分析其与乳腺癌患者临床病理参数的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析血浆外泌体miR-21、miR-17-5p对乳腺癌的诊断价值。

结果

乳腺癌组患者血浆外泌体miR-17-5p表达水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05),而miR-21表达水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05);miR-17-5p单独检测时曲线下面积(AUC)为0.677,敏感度为58.14%,特异度为75.56%,截断值为0.72;miR-21单独检测时AUC为0.694,敏感度为59.30%,特异度为77.78%,截断值为1.68;联合检测时敏感度为96.51%,特异度为95.56%,准确性为96.18%;联合检测诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度及准确性均显著高于单项检测(P<0.05)。血浆外泌体miR-17-5p、miR-21表达水平均与TNM分期、分化程度、淋巴结转移、cerbB-2及Ki-67有关(P<0.05)。

结论

血浆外泌体低表达的miR-17-5p与高表达的miR-21均可作为诊断乳腺癌的潜在生物学标志物。

Objective

To investigate the expression of micro RNA-21 (miR-21) and micro RNA-17-5p (miR-17-5p) in the plasma of patients with breast cancer and their diagnostic values.

Methods

Eighty-six patients with breast cancer diagnosed in Chengdu Seventh People’s Hospital from June 2017 to March 2018 were selected as the breast cancer group, and 45 healthy women were selected as the control group. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of miR-21 and miR-17-5p in plasma exosomes of two groups. According to the results of qRT-PCR, breast cancer patients were divided into miR-17-5p high-expression group and miR-17-5p low-expression group, miR-21 high-expression group and miR-21 low-expression group, and the relationship between them with clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer patients was analyzed. The diagnostic values of plasma exosomes miR-21 and miR-17-5p in breast cancer were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

Results

The expression of plasma exosome miR-17-5p in breast cancer group was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05), and the expression of plasma exosomemiR-21 was significantly higher (P<0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of detection of miR-17-5p alone was 0.677, the sensitivity was 58.14%, the specificity was 75.56%, and the truncation value was 0.72; the AUC of detection of miR-21 alone was 0.694, the sensitivity was 59.30%, the specificity was 77.78%, and the truncation value was 1.68; the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combined detection were 96.51%, 95.56% and 96.18% respectively; the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combined detection of breast cancer were significantly higher than those of single detection (P<0.05). The expression levels ofmiR-17-5p and miR-21in plasma exosomes were correlated with TNM stage, differentiation degree, lymph nodemetastasis, cerbB-2 and Ki-67 (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Low expression of miR-17-5p and high expression of miR-21 in plasma exosome can be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

表1 两组受试者血浆外泌体miR-17-5p、miR-21表达水平比较(±s
图1 ROC曲线评估血浆外泌体miR-17-5p、miR-21对乳腺癌诊断价值
表2 联合检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值[%(例)]
表3 血浆外泌体miR-17-5p、miR-21表达水平与乳腺癌患者临床病理参数的关系[例(%)]
[1]
吴娟,孙圣荣,袁静萍. 肿瘤微环境与乳腺癌[J]. 中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志, 2018, 27(1): 82-86.
[2]
Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(4): 271-289.
[3]
盛湲,李恒宇. 外泌体:乳腺癌精确诊疗的新热点[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 133-136.
[4]
葛鑫鑫,段卫明,姚利, 等. 血清微小RNA-21在乳腺癌患者中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中国血液流变学杂志, 2016, 26(3): 273-275.
[5]
魏倩,张鹏. 乳腺癌患者癌组织、血清miR-17-5p水平变化及意义[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(16): 54-55.
[6]
Abdel-Rahman O. Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2018, 168(1): 269-275.
[7]
黄育北,宋丰举,陈可欣. 乳腺癌全基因组关联研究的现状及其应用价值的分析方法[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2015, 36(10): 1058-1061.
[8]
Kasiappan R, Rajarajan D. Role of microRNA regulation in obesity-associated breast cancer: nutritional perspectives[J]. Adv Nutr, 2017, 8(6): 868-888.
[9]
张艳,申娴娟,鞠少卿. 外泌体在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2016, 39(6): 466.
[10]
Wang Y, Li J, Dai L, et al. MiR-17-5p may serve as a novel predictor for breast cancer recurrence[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2018, 22(4): 1-6.
[11]
魏倩,张鹏. miR-17-5p在宫颈癌组织中的表达变化及其对宫颈癌细胞生长增殖影响[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(43): 8-10.
[12]
Yu F, Guo Y, Chen B, et al. MicroRNA-17-5p activates hepatic stellate cells through targeting of Smad7[J]. Lab Invest, 2015, 95(7): 781-789.
[13]
Ge Q, Zhou Y, Lu J, et al. MiRNA in plasma exosome is stable under different, storage conditions[J]. Molecules, 2014, 19(2): 1568-1575.
[14]
李振宇,冯云,卢秀波. 微小RNA-21在乳腺癌细胞中的作用[J]. 中国医学创新, 2014, 11(28): 4-6.
[15]
吴翠云,梁爱玲,刘勇军. miR-21与乳腺癌关系的研究进展[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(14): 2200-2202.
[16]
Si X, Zang R, Zhang E, et al. LncRNA H19 confers chemoresistance in E-positive breast cancer through epigenetic silencing of the pro-apoptotic gene BIK[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(49): 81452-81462.
[17]
Yuan P, Xu B, Wang C, et al. Ki-67 expression in luminal type breast cancer and its association with the clinicopathology of the cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2016, 11(3): 2101-2105.
[18]
张文昭,李莹,陶才华. 血清miR-21、miR-195、miR-222联合检测对早期乳腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2016, 22(14): 1591-1593.
[19]
吴莹莹,高波,丁跃明, 等. miR-17-5p在肿瘤中作用的研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43(3): 130-134.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[3] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[4] 刘昌玲, 张金丽, 张志, 李孝建, 汤文彬, 胡逸萍, 陈宾, 谢晓娜. 负载人脂肪干细胞外泌体的甲基丙烯酰化明胶水凝胶对人皮肤成纤维细胞增殖和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 517-525.
[5] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[6] 宋勤琴, 李双汝, 李林, 杜鹃, 刘继松. 间充质干细胞源性外泌体在改善病理性瘢痕中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 550-553.
[7] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[8] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[9] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[10] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[11] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[12] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[13] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
阅读次数
全文


摘要