切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 121 -124. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效对比分析
陈伟平1,(), 黄君1, 芦灵军1, 杨百仞1, 徐其银1, 孙赳1, 樊建新1   
  1. 1. 644000 宜宾市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈伟平

Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for liver metastasis from gastric cancer

Weiping Chen1,(), Jun Huang1, Lingjun Lu1, Bairen Yang1, Qiyin Xu1, Jiu Sun1, Jianxin Fan1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Yibin First People’s Hospital, Yibin 644000, China
  • Received:2019-07-29 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Weiping Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Weiping, Email:
引用本文:

陈伟平, 黄君, 芦灵军, 杨百仞, 徐其银, 孙赳, 樊建新. 开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 121-124.

Weiping Chen, Jun Huang, Lingjun Lu, Bairen Yang, Qiyin Xu, Jiu Sun, Jianxin Fan. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for liver metastasis from gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 121-124.

目的

对比开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移(GCLM)的临床疗效与术后生存情况。

方法

回顾性分析2016年6月至2017年6月宜宾市第一人民医院收治的150例GCLM患者临床资料,根据手术类型将其分为开腹组(78例)和腹腔镜组(72例)。对比两组患者的临床资料、围手术期相关指标、术后并发症发生情况,Kaplan-Meier法分析患者术后2年生存情况。

结果

与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组患者的手术时间更长,术中出血量更少,术后通气时间、住院时间显著缩短(P<0.05),但两组术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。中位随访时间30(24~36)个月,两组平均生存时间以及术后2年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.257,P=0.211;χ2=0.530,P=0.511)。

结论

与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜辅助治疗GCLM出血量少,术后恢复时间短,周围淋巴结清扫效果、预后生存情况相似,安全可行。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) and to analyze the postoperative survival.

Methods

The clinical data of one hundred and fifty patients with GCLM admitted to Yibin First People’s Hospital from June 2016 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into laparotomy group (78 cases) and laparoscopic group (72 cases). The clinical data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, and 2-year survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had longer operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter postoperative ventilation time and hospitalization time (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups. After 30 (24-36) months of median follow-up, there were no significant differences in mean survival time and 2-year survival rate after surgery between the two groups (t=1.257, P=0.211; χ2=0.530, P=0.511).

Conclusion

Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic assisted treatment of GCLM has less bleeding, shorter recovery time, similar effect of peripheral lymph node dissection, prognosis and survival, and is safe and feasible.

表1 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者临床资料比较
表2 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者术后并发症发生情况[例(%)]
图1 两组胃癌肝转移患者术后2年生存曲线
[1]
Jiang H, Li Q, Yu S, et al. Impact of HER2 expression on outcome in gastric cancer patients with liver metastasis[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2017, 19(2): 197-203.
[2]
Wu P, Wang P, Ma B, et al. Palliative gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for incurable advanced gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2018, 10(1): 4759-4771.
[3]
Zhang Z, Sun S, Qi J, et al. Three united laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of gastric cardia cancer--a comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy-assisted surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(2): 115-120.
[4]
胡祥. 2014年第4版日本《胃癌治疗指南》更新要旨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(1): 16-19.
[5]
Ikari N, Taniguchi K, Serizawa A, et al. A primary tumor of mixed histological type is a novel poor prognostic factor for patients undergoing resection of liver metastasis from gastric cancer[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2017, 24(5): 281-288.
[6]
Kostakis ID, Alexandrou A, Armeni E, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Europe: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Scand J Surg, 2017, 106(1): 3-20.
[7]
王伟伟,张建生,吴会国, 等. 伴发疾病对原发性胃癌腹腔镜手术患者腹部并发症发病率的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(10): 64-67.
[8]
Liu Q, Ding L, Jiang H, et al. Efficacy of fast track surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 50(1): 28-34.
[9]
Xiao Y, Zhang B, Wu Y. Prognostic analysis and liver metastases relevant factors after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with metachronous liver metastases: A population-based study[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2019, 188(2): 415-424.
[10]
李纯坚,施申超,罗金波. 开腹与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的临床对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(1): 46-49.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要