切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 121 -124. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效对比分析
陈伟平1,(), 黄君1, 芦灵军1, 杨百仞1, 徐其银1, 孙赳1, 樊建新1   
  1. 1. 644000 宜宾市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈伟平

Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for liver metastasis from gastric cancer

Weiping Chen1,(), Jun Huang1, Lingjun Lu1, Bairen Yang1, Qiyin Xu1, Jiu Sun1, Jianxin Fan1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Yibin First People’s Hospital, Yibin 644000, China
  • Received:2019-07-29 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Weiping Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Weiping, Email:
引用本文:

陈伟平, 黄君, 芦灵军, 杨百仞, 徐其银, 孙赳, 樊建新. 开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 121-124.

Weiping Chen, Jun Huang, Lingjun Lu, Bairen Yang, Qiyin Xu, Jiu Sun, Jianxin Fan. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for liver metastasis from gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 121-124.

目的

对比开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗胃癌肝转移(GCLM)的临床疗效与术后生存情况。

方法

回顾性分析2016年6月至2017年6月宜宾市第一人民医院收治的150例GCLM患者临床资料,根据手术类型将其分为开腹组(78例)和腹腔镜组(72例)。对比两组患者的临床资料、围手术期相关指标、术后并发症发生情况,Kaplan-Meier法分析患者术后2年生存情况。

结果

与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组患者的手术时间更长,术中出血量更少,术后通气时间、住院时间显著缩短(P<0.05),但两组术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。中位随访时间30(24~36)个月,两组平均生存时间以及术后2年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.257,P=0.211;χ2=0.530,P=0.511)。

结论

与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜辅助治疗GCLM出血量少,术后恢复时间短,周围淋巴结清扫效果、预后生存情况相似,安全可行。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) and to analyze the postoperative survival.

Methods

The clinical data of one hundred and fifty patients with GCLM admitted to Yibin First People’s Hospital from June 2016 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into laparotomy group (78 cases) and laparoscopic group (72 cases). The clinical data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, and 2-year survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had longer operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter postoperative ventilation time and hospitalization time (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups. After 30 (24-36) months of median follow-up, there were no significant differences in mean survival time and 2-year survival rate after surgery between the two groups (t=1.257, P=0.211; χ2=0.530, P=0.511).

Conclusion

Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic assisted treatment of GCLM has less bleeding, shorter recovery time, similar effect of peripheral lymph node dissection, prognosis and survival, and is safe and feasible.

表1 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者临床资料比较
表2 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组胃癌肝转移手术患者术后并发症发生情况[例(%)]
图1 两组胃癌肝转移患者术后2年生存曲线
[1]
Jiang H, Li Q, Yu S, et al. Impact of HER2 expression on outcome in gastric cancer patients with liver metastasis[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2017, 19(2): 197-203.
[2]
Wu P, Wang P, Ma B, et al. Palliative gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for incurable advanced gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2018, 10(1): 4759-4771.
[3]
Zhang Z, Sun S, Qi J, et al. Three united laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of gastric cardia cancer--a comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy-assisted surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(2): 115-120.
[4]
胡祥. 2014年第4版日本《胃癌治疗指南》更新要旨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(1): 16-19.
[5]
Ikari N, Taniguchi K, Serizawa A, et al. A primary tumor of mixed histological type is a novel poor prognostic factor for patients undergoing resection of liver metastasis from gastric cancer[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2017, 24(5): 281-288.
[6]
Kostakis ID, Alexandrou A, Armeni E, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Europe: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Scand J Surg, 2017, 106(1): 3-20.
[7]
王伟伟,张建生,吴会国, 等. 伴发疾病对原发性胃癌腹腔镜手术患者腹部并发症发病率的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(10): 64-67.
[8]
Liu Q, Ding L, Jiang H, et al. Efficacy of fast track surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 50(1): 28-34.
[9]
Xiao Y, Zhang B, Wu Y. Prognostic analysis and liver metastases relevant factors after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with metachronous liver metastases: A population-based study[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2019, 188(2): 415-424.
[10]
李纯坚,施申超,罗金波. 开腹与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的临床对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(1): 46-49.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[5] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[6] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[7] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[8] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[9] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[10] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[11] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[12] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[13] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[14] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要