切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 235 -238. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.03.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效优势
郭鹏1,(), 陈金芳1, 苏刚1, 张小华1   
  1. 1. 434300 荆州,湖北省公安县人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-27 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郭鹏

Clinical observation of total extraperitoneal patch repair combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia with varicocele

Peng Guo1,(), Jinfang Chen1, Gang Su1, Xiaohua Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People's Hospital of Gongan County, Hubei Province, Jingzhou 434300, China
  • Received:2019-08-27 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Peng Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Peng, Email:
引用本文:

郭鹏, 陈金芳, 苏刚, 张小华. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效优势[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 235-238.

Peng Guo, Jinfang Chen, Gang Su, Xiaohua Zhang. Clinical observation of total extraperitoneal patch repair combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia with varicocele[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 235-238.

目的

探究腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术(TEP)联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年3月至2019年5月湖北省公安县人民医院收治的82例腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张患者资料。按照治疗方法分为对照组(49例,TEP治疗)和试验组(33例,TEP联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗),比较两组患者手术时间、排气时间、住院时间、治疗前后精液参数、精索静脉曲张疗效及并发症发生情况。

结果

试验组患者手术时间、住院时间均长于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=40.196、6.893,均P<0.001)。术后7 d比较,试验组精子密度、A级精子比例均高于同期对照组,畸形率更低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组的精索静脉曲张疗效(Z=15.444,P<0.001)及并发症发生率(χ2=7.009,P=0.008)均显著优于对照组患者。

结论

相比于单纯TEP手术,TEP联合精索静脉高位结扎术治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的临床治疗效果较好,患者症状改善时间也相对较短。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of total extraperitoneal patch repair (TEP) combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of patients with inguinal hernia combined with varicocele.

Methods

From March 2016 to May 2019, eighty-two cases of inguinal hernia complicated with varicocele in People's Hospital of Gongan County were studied. The patients were divided into control group (49 cases, TEP treatment) and trial group (33 cases, TEP combined with high ligation of spermatic vein), and the differences of operation time, exhaust time, hospital stay, semen parameters, efficacy of varicocele and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time and the hospitalization time of the trial group was longer than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=40.196, 6.893, both P<0.001). Seven days after the operation, the sperm density and the proportion of A-level sperm in the trial group were both higher than those in the control group, and the abnormality rate was lower, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The efficacy and complications of varicocele in the trial group were better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (Z=15.444, P<0.001; χ2=7.009, P=0.008).

Conclusion

Compared with TEP alone, TEP combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia combined with varicocele shows better clinical effect and a relatively short symptoms improvement time.

表1 两组腹股沟疝患者临床指标的比较(±s
表2 两组患者手术前后精液参数的比较(±s
[1]
唐石驹, 吴水来, 董红平, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补对中青年男性腹股沟疝疗效的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(12): 83-87.
[2]
Michalinos A, Moris D, Vernadakis S. Amyand’s hernia: A case series with critics of role of appendectomy[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19 (6): 987-990.
[3]
Kerkeni W, Saadi A, Ben Miled A, et al. Vasitis: An uncommon diagnosis mimicking incarcerated inguinal hernia[J]. Urology, 2016, 93: 1.
[4]
沈雄飞, 江礼娟, 马冬华, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的学习曲线[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(19): 2662-2664.
[5]
申亚伟, 黄新, 马小安, 等. TEP与Lichtenstein在疝修补术中的临床对比研究[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(6): 927-930.
[6]
钟诚, 汪宏. 双腹腔镜全腹膜外无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(6): 524-526.
[7]
陈启生, 朱应昌, 梁伟潮, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗股疝的体会[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(17): 78-79.
[8]
Huszár O, Zaránd A, Szántó G, et al. A giant myxoid leiomyoma mimicking an inguinal hernia[J]. Orv Hetil, 2016, 157(10): 392-395.
[9]
郝永胜, 李永鹏, 霍瑞麟. Stoppa入路腹膜外疝修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床对照研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2017, 17(6): 859-861.
[10]
曾斌. 腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP)与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2017, 28(11): 2054-2055.
[11]
肖强, 曾军, 梁海飞, 等. 不同术式的疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝后的临床疗效观察[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(4): 603-607.
[12]
王桐生, 丁磊, 赵爱民, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 118-121.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[11] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[12] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[13] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要