切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 235 -238. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.03.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效优势
郭鹏1,(), 陈金芳1, 苏刚1, 张小华1   
  1. 1. 434300 荆州,湖北省公安县人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-27 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郭鹏

Clinical observation of total extraperitoneal patch repair combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia with varicocele

Peng Guo1,(), Jinfang Chen1, Gang Su1, Xiaohua Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People's Hospital of Gongan County, Hubei Province, Jingzhou 434300, China
  • Received:2019-08-27 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Peng Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Peng, Email:
引用本文:

郭鹏, 陈金芳, 苏刚, 张小华. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效优势[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 235-238.

Peng Guo, Jinfang Chen, Gang Su, Xiaohua Zhang. Clinical observation of total extraperitoneal patch repair combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia with varicocele[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 235-238.

目的

探究腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术(TEP)联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年3月至2019年5月湖北省公安县人民医院收治的82例腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张患者资料。按照治疗方法分为对照组(49例,TEP治疗)和试验组(33例,TEP联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗),比较两组患者手术时间、排气时间、住院时间、治疗前后精液参数、精索静脉曲张疗效及并发症发生情况。

结果

试验组患者手术时间、住院时间均长于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=40.196、6.893,均P<0.001)。术后7 d比较,试验组精子密度、A级精子比例均高于同期对照组,畸形率更低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组的精索静脉曲张疗效(Z=15.444,P<0.001)及并发症发生率(χ2=7.009,P=0.008)均显著优于对照组患者。

结论

相比于单纯TEP手术,TEP联合精索静脉高位结扎术治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的临床治疗效果较好,患者症状改善时间也相对较短。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of total extraperitoneal patch repair (TEP) combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of patients with inguinal hernia combined with varicocele.

Methods

From March 2016 to May 2019, eighty-two cases of inguinal hernia complicated with varicocele in People's Hospital of Gongan County were studied. The patients were divided into control group (49 cases, TEP treatment) and trial group (33 cases, TEP combined with high ligation of spermatic vein), and the differences of operation time, exhaust time, hospital stay, semen parameters, efficacy of varicocele and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time and the hospitalization time of the trial group was longer than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=40.196, 6.893, both P<0.001). Seven days after the operation, the sperm density and the proportion of A-level sperm in the trial group were both higher than those in the control group, and the abnormality rate was lower, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The efficacy and complications of varicocele in the trial group were better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (Z=15.444, P<0.001; χ2=7.009, P=0.008).

Conclusion

Compared with TEP alone, TEP combined with high ligation of spermatic vein in the treatment of inguinal hernia combined with varicocele shows better clinical effect and a relatively short symptoms improvement time.

表1 两组腹股沟疝患者临床指标的比较(±s
表2 两组患者手术前后精液参数的比较(±s
[1]
唐石驹, 吴水来, 董红平, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补对中青年男性腹股沟疝疗效的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(12): 83-87.
[2]
Michalinos A, Moris D, Vernadakis S. Amyand’s hernia: A case series with critics of role of appendectomy[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19 (6): 987-990.
[3]
Kerkeni W, Saadi A, Ben Miled A, et al. Vasitis: An uncommon diagnosis mimicking incarcerated inguinal hernia[J]. Urology, 2016, 93: 1.
[4]
沈雄飞, 江礼娟, 马冬华, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的学习曲线[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(19): 2662-2664.
[5]
申亚伟, 黄新, 马小安, 等. TEP与Lichtenstein在疝修补术中的临床对比研究[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(6): 927-930.
[6]
钟诚, 汪宏. 双腹腔镜全腹膜外无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(6): 524-526.
[7]
陈启生, 朱应昌, 梁伟潮, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗股疝的体会[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(17): 78-79.
[8]
Huszár O, Zaránd A, Szántó G, et al. A giant myxoid leiomyoma mimicking an inguinal hernia[J]. Orv Hetil, 2016, 157(10): 392-395.
[9]
郝永胜, 李永鹏, 霍瑞麟. Stoppa入路腹膜外疝修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床对照研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2017, 17(6): 859-861.
[10]
曾斌. 腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP)与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2017, 28(11): 2054-2055.
[11]
肖强, 曾军, 梁海飞, 等. 不同术式的疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝后的临床疗效观察[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(4): 603-607.
[12]
王桐生, 丁磊, 赵爱民, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 118-121.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?