切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 86 -90. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.02.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌诊治中的临床应用
丁平安1, 郭洪海1, 张志栋1, 杨沛刚1, 田园1, 刘洋1, 林叶成1, 檀碧波1, 王冬1, 李勇1, 赵群1,()   
  1. 1. 050011 石家庄,河北医科大学第四医院外三科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-06 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 赵群
  • 基金资助:
    河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(ZD2019139); 河北卫健委县级公立医院适宜卫生技术推广入库项目(2019024); 河北省政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目(2019012)

Clinical application of laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis and treatment of stage b gastric cancer

Ping’an Ding1, Honghai Guo1, Zhidong Zhang1, Peigang Yang1, Yuan Tian1, Yang Liu1, Yecheng Lin1, Bibo Tan1, Dong Wang1, Yong Li1, Qun Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
  • Received:2020-12-06 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qun Zhao
引用本文:

丁平安, 郭洪海, 张志栋, 杨沛刚, 田园, 刘洋, 林叶成, 檀碧波, 王冬, 李勇, 赵群. 腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌诊治中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 86-90.

Ping’an Ding, Honghai Guo, Zhidong Zhang, Peigang Yang, Yuan Tian, Yang Liu, Yecheng Lin, Bibo Tan, Dong Wang, Yong Li, Qun Zhao. Clinical application of laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis and treatment of stage b gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 86-90.

目的

探讨腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌(伴有单一不可切除因素的远处转移晚期胃癌)患者腹腔转移精准分期及临床诊治中的临床意义。

方法

回顾性分析2015年10月至2018年10月河北医科大学第四医院连续收治的618例胃癌患者临床资料,患者临床影像学分期为Ⅳb期且随访资料完整,按照治疗方案的不同分成两组:直接化疗组(直接行全身性化疗)和腹腔镜探查组(腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测,根据探查结果决定治疗方案),比较两组患者治疗情况及预后情况。

结果

直接化疗组285例,2年总生存率为46.67%。腹腔镜探查组333例,2年总生存率为59.46%,其中P0CY0 185例(55.56%),P0CY1 85例(25.53%),P1CY1 63例(18.92%),2年生存率分别68.65%、57.65%、34.92%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组2年总生存率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中腹腔镜探查组发生肝转移、肺转移、卵巢转移、16a2/b1组淋巴结转移及左锁骨上淋巴结转移患者的2年生存率明显优于直接化疗组中相同转移部位患者(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测有助于发现腹腔内隐蔽性转移,同时还能为合并腹腔转移的Ⅳb期胃癌患者提供一种新的诊疗模式即腹腔镜探查确诊-腹腔热灌注化疗,显著提高临床决策及诊治水平。

Objective

To explore the clinical significance of laparoscopy combined with peritoneal exfoliative cytology in the precise staging and clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with stage Ⅳb gastric cancer (advanced gastric cancer with distant metastasis with a single unresectable factor).

Methods

The clinical data of 618 consecutive patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2015 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, the clinical imaging stage of the patients was stage Ⅳb and the follow-up data were complete. They were divided into two groups according to different treatment plans: direct chemotherapy group (direct systemic chemotherapy) and laparoscopy group (laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliation cytology, the treatment plan was determined according to the results of the exploration), the treatment and prognosis between the two groups were compared.

Results

There were 285 cases in the direct chemotherapy group, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 46.67%. In the laparoscopy group, there were 333 cases with 2-year overall survival rate of 59.46%, including 185 cases (55.56%) of P0CY0, 85 cases (25.53%) of P0CY1, 63 cases (18.92%) of P1CY1, and the 2-year survival rates were 68.65%, 57.65% and 34.92% respectively (P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the 2-year overall survival rate between the two groups (P<0.001). The 2-year survival rate of patients with liver metastasis, lung metastasis, ovarian metastasis, lymph node metastasis and left supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in the laparoscopy group was significantly better than that in the direct chemotherapy group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology helps to discover hidden metastasis in the abdominal cavity, meanwhile it can provide a new diagnosis and treatment mode, laparoscopy confirmed diagnosis-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, for the treatment of patients with stage Ⅳb gastric cancer with abdominal metastasis, which will significantly improve clinical decision-making.

表1 两组胃癌患者基本临床特征的比较(例)
表2 618例胃癌患者获得完整随访情况[例(%)]
图1 腹腔镜探查组与直接化疗组总体2年生存率对比 A为总体;B为肝转移;C为肺转移;D为卵巢转移;E为16a2/b1组淋巴结转移;F为左锁骨上淋巴结转移
图2 333例Ⅳb期胃癌患者腹腔镜探查后2年生存率P0,无腹膜转移;P1,有腹膜转移;CY0,腹腔灌洗液细胞学检查无癌细胞;CY1,腹腔灌洗液细胞学检查有癌细胞
[1]
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
[2]
中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟. 中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟数据报告(2014—2016)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 90-93.
[3]
葛宏升,周军,魏海梁. 全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌根治术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胃癌的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 143-147.
[4]
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(12): 1350-1357.
[5]
丁平安,刘洋,郭洪海,等. 腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检查在局部进展期胃癌诊治中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 170-176.
[6]
日本胃癌学会. 胃癌取扱い規約[M]. 14版. 东京: 金原出版, 2010.
[7]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[8]
徐惠绵,王鑫. 我国胃癌诊治临床研究现状与展望[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 109-114.
[9]
Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2016[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2019, 51(2): 417-430.
[10]
Lasithiotakis K, Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, et al. Gastrectomy for stage Ⅳ gastric cancer. A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2014, 34(5): 2079-2085.
[11]
Hartgrink HH, Putter H, Klein Kranenbarg E, et al. Value of palliative resection in gastric cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(11): 1438-1443.
[12]
Yamaguchi K, Yoshida K, Tanahashi T, et al. The long-term survival of stage IV gastric cancer patients with conversion therapy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21(2): 315-323.
[13]
朱正纲. 进展期胃癌围手术期治疗全程管理的若干要点[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 115-122.
[14]
张帆,郝迎学,唐波,等. 不同浆膜受侵犯面积胃癌患者行腹腔镜胃癌根治术对腹腔微转移的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(5): 400-404.
[15]
李雁. 腹膜癌研究之我见[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39(22): 1685-1686.
[16]
Wang P, Zhou ZX. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: trial results of a phase 2, randomized, clinical trial[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(Suppl 3): 623.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[14] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要