切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 86 -90. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.02.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌诊治中的临床应用
丁平安1, 郭洪海1, 张志栋1, 杨沛刚1, 田园1, 刘洋1, 林叶成1, 檀碧波1, 王冬1, 李勇1, 赵群1,()   
  1. 1. 050011 石家庄,河北医科大学第四医院外三科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-06 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 赵群
  • 基金资助:
    河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(ZD2019139); 河北卫健委县级公立医院适宜卫生技术推广入库项目(2019024); 河北省政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目(2019012)

Clinical application of laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis and treatment of stage b gastric cancer

Ping’an Ding1, Honghai Guo1, Zhidong Zhang1, Peigang Yang1, Yuan Tian1, Yang Liu1, Yecheng Lin1, Bibo Tan1, Dong Wang1, Yong Li1, Qun Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
  • Received:2020-12-06 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qun Zhao
引用本文:

丁平安, 郭洪海, 张志栋, 杨沛刚, 田园, 刘洋, 林叶成, 檀碧波, 王冬, 李勇, 赵群. 腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌诊治中的临床应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 86-90.

Ping’an Ding, Honghai Guo, Zhidong Zhang, Peigang Yang, Yuan Tian, Yang Liu, Yecheng Lin, Bibo Tan, Dong Wang, Yong Li, Qun Zhao. Clinical application of laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis and treatment of stage b gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 86-90.

目的

探讨腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测在Ⅳb期胃癌(伴有单一不可切除因素的远处转移晚期胃癌)患者腹腔转移精准分期及临床诊治中的临床意义。

方法

回顾性分析2015年10月至2018年10月河北医科大学第四医院连续收治的618例胃癌患者临床资料,患者临床影像学分期为Ⅳb期且随访资料完整,按照治疗方案的不同分成两组:直接化疗组(直接行全身性化疗)和腹腔镜探查组(腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测,根据探查结果决定治疗方案),比较两组患者治疗情况及预后情况。

结果

直接化疗组285例,2年总生存率为46.67%。腹腔镜探查组333例,2年总生存率为59.46%,其中P0CY0 185例(55.56%),P0CY1 85例(25.53%),P1CY1 63例(18.92%),2年生存率分别68.65%、57.65%、34.92%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组2年总生存率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中腹腔镜探查组发生肝转移、肺转移、卵巢转移、16a2/b1组淋巴结转移及左锁骨上淋巴结转移患者的2年生存率明显优于直接化疗组中相同转移部位患者(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检测有助于发现腹腔内隐蔽性转移,同时还能为合并腹腔转移的Ⅳb期胃癌患者提供一种新的诊疗模式即腹腔镜探查确诊-腹腔热灌注化疗,显著提高临床决策及诊治水平。

Objective

To explore the clinical significance of laparoscopy combined with peritoneal exfoliative cytology in the precise staging and clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with stage Ⅳb gastric cancer (advanced gastric cancer with distant metastasis with a single unresectable factor).

Methods

The clinical data of 618 consecutive patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2015 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, the clinical imaging stage of the patients was stage Ⅳb and the follow-up data were complete. They were divided into two groups according to different treatment plans: direct chemotherapy group (direct systemic chemotherapy) and laparoscopy group (laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliation cytology, the treatment plan was determined according to the results of the exploration), the treatment and prognosis between the two groups were compared.

Results

There were 285 cases in the direct chemotherapy group, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 46.67%. In the laparoscopy group, there were 333 cases with 2-year overall survival rate of 59.46%, including 185 cases (55.56%) of P0CY0, 85 cases (25.53%) of P0CY1, 63 cases (18.92%) of P1CY1, and the 2-year survival rates were 68.65%, 57.65% and 34.92% respectively (P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the 2-year overall survival rate between the two groups (P<0.001). The 2-year survival rate of patients with liver metastasis, lung metastasis, ovarian metastasis, lymph node metastasis and left supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in the laparoscopy group was significantly better than that in the direct chemotherapy group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopy combined with abdominal exfoliative cytology helps to discover hidden metastasis in the abdominal cavity, meanwhile it can provide a new diagnosis and treatment mode, laparoscopy confirmed diagnosis-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, for the treatment of patients with stage Ⅳb gastric cancer with abdominal metastasis, which will significantly improve clinical decision-making.

表1 两组胃癌患者基本临床特征的比较(例)
表2 618例胃癌患者获得完整随访情况[例(%)]
图1 腹腔镜探查组与直接化疗组总体2年生存率对比 A为总体;B为肝转移;C为肺转移;D为卵巢转移;E为16a2/b1组淋巴结转移;F为左锁骨上淋巴结转移
图2 333例Ⅳb期胃癌患者腹腔镜探查后2年生存率P0,无腹膜转移;P1,有腹膜转移;CY0,腹腔灌洗液细胞学检查无癌细胞;CY1,腹腔灌洗液细胞学检查有癌细胞
[1]
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
[2]
中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟. 中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟数据报告(2014—2016)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 90-93.
[3]
葛宏升,周军,魏海梁. 全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌根治术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胃癌的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 143-147.
[4]
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(12): 1350-1357.
[5]
丁平安,刘洋,郭洪海,等. 腹腔镜探查联合腹腔脱落细胞学检查在局部进展期胃癌诊治中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 170-176.
[6]
日本胃癌学会. 胃癌取扱い規約[M]. 14版. 东京: 金原出版, 2010.
[7]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[8]
徐惠绵,王鑫. 我国胃癌诊治临床研究现状与展望[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 109-114.
[9]
Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2016[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2019, 51(2): 417-430.
[10]
Lasithiotakis K, Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, et al. Gastrectomy for stage Ⅳ gastric cancer. A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2014, 34(5): 2079-2085.
[11]
Hartgrink HH, Putter H, Klein Kranenbarg E, et al. Value of palliative resection in gastric cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(11): 1438-1443.
[12]
Yamaguchi K, Yoshida K, Tanahashi T, et al. The long-term survival of stage IV gastric cancer patients with conversion therapy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21(2): 315-323.
[13]
朱正纲. 进展期胃癌围手术期治疗全程管理的若干要点[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 115-122.
[14]
张帆,郝迎学,唐波,等. 不同浆膜受侵犯面积胃癌患者行腹腔镜胃癌根治术对腹腔微转移的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(5): 400-404.
[15]
李雁. 腹膜癌研究之我见[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39(22): 1685-1686.
[16]
Wang P, Zhou ZX. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: trial results of a phase 2, randomized, clinical trial[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(Suppl 3): 623.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[4] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[9] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要