切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华普通外科学文献(电子版)

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 234 -240. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.03.017

所属专题： 文献；

循证医学

机器人与传统腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对比的Meta分析
王素1, 孙振青2, 苏萌萌2, 王东升2,†(), 宋保连1, 栾响1, 王萍1   
  1. 1. 266109　青岛大学第十五临床医学院普外科
    2. 266003　青岛大学附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-06 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王东升

Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and traditional laparoscopic rectal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis

Su Wang1, Zhenqing Sun2, Mengmeng Su2, Dongsheng Wang2,†(), Baolian Song1, Xiang Luan1, Ping Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Fifteenth Clinical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266109, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2021-01-06 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Dongsheng Wang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王素, 孙振青, 苏萌萌, 王东升, 宋保连, 栾响, 王萍. 机器人与传统腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 234-240.

Su Wang, Zhenqing Sun, Mengmeng Su, Dongsheng Wang, Baolian Song, Xiang Luan, Ping Wang. Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and traditional laparoscopic rectal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: A Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 234-240.

目的

通过Meta分析的方法比较机器人远端胃癌根治术（远端胃大部切除术，RDG）与传统腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术（LDG）之间的近期疗效。

方法

检索包括EMBASE、Pubmed、Cochrane Library、中国知网（CNKI）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、维普、万方数据库有关RDG与LDG优劣比较的研究，检索时间为建库至2020年10月。NOS评分系统评价文献质量。采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行统计分析。

结果

最终纳入符合标准的相关文献14篇共2 456例患者，其中RDG组852例（34.69%），LDG组1 604例（65.31%）。与LDG组相比，RDG组手术时间长（WMD=-22.59，95% CI：-25.55~ -19.62，P<0.001），术中失血量少（WMD=34.29，95% CI：20.71~47.87，P<0.001），术后首次进食时间提前（WMD=0.33，95% CI：0.13~0.54，P=0.002），住院时间缩短（WMD=0.88，95% CI：0.05~1.71，P=0.04）。在术后首次排气时间、淋巴结清扫数目和总并发症发生率，以及腹部切口愈合不良、术后感染、术后腹腔出血、肠梗阻、肠漏等5种常见并发症方面，两组差异无统计学意义。

结论

RDG可以减少术中失血量，缩短患者术后首次进食时间和住院时间，但是对于缩短手术时间、术后首次排气时间、淋巴结清扫数目和总并发症发生率方面无明显优势。

关键词: 胃切除术, 机器人, 腹腔镜, Meta分析
Objective

To compare the short-term efficacy of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) and traditional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) by Meta-analysis.

Methods

A literature search was performed including EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang databases. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to October 2020. NOS scoring system was used to evaluate literature quality. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 2 456 patients with 14 relevant literatures met the standards, including 852 patients (34.69%) in RDG group and 1 604 patients (65.31%) in LDG group. Compared with LDG group, RDG group had longer operation time (WMD=-22.59, 95% CI: -25.55, -19.62; P<0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=34.29, 95% CI: 20.71, 47.87; P<0.001), earlier postoperative first feeding time (WMD=0.33, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.54; P=0.002), and shorter hospital stay (WMD=0.88, 95% CI: 0.05, 1.71; P=0.04). There were no statistical differences in the postoperative first exhaust time, the number of lymph node dissection and the incidence of total complications, as well as in the following common postoperative complications, such as poor healing of abdominal incision, infection, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction and intestinal leakage between the two groups.

Conclusions

RDG for distal gastric cancer can reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the first postoperative feeding time and the hospital stay. However, it has no obvious advantages in terms of shortening the operation time, the postoperative first exhaust time, the number of lymph node dissection and the incidence of total complications.

Key words: Gastrectomy, Robotics, Laparoscopes, Meta-analysis
表1 纳入文献基本特征及质量评价
第一作者及发表年 国家 研究类型 研究期限(年) 分组(例) 性别(例,男/女) 体质指数(kg/m2) TNM分期 NOS(分)
LDG DRG LDG RDG LDG RDG
彭鸿2018[6] 中国 回顾 2015—2017 120 120 82/38 78/42 24.45±3.41 24.37±3.00 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 6
李松岩2018[7] 中国 前瞻 2015—2017 56 50 39/17 35/15 24.6±2.4 24.3±2.1 T2、T3、T4a 7
Hong 2016[8] 韩国 回顾 2008—2015 232 232 156/76 154/78 23.8±3.0 23.8±3.3 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 7
Cianchi 2016[9] 意大利 前瞻 2008—2015 41 30 19/22 14/16 26(23~30) 27(23~38) Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 7
Kim 2016[10] 韩国 前瞻 2009—2011 288 87 170/118 46/41 24±4.3 24.1±3.4 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 6
Lee 2015[11] 韩国 回顾 2003—2010 267 133 154/113 85/48 23.7±2.8 23.2±2.7 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 7
Seo 2015[12] 韩国 回顾 2004—2009 40 40 20/20 19/21 23.8±1.9 23.6±2.1 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 5
Noshiro 2014[13] 日本 前瞻 2010—2012 160 21 102/58 14/7 21.8±2.8 22.8±3.1 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ 6
赵坤2013[14] 中国 回顾 2012.1—2012.5 30 30 23/7 22/8 23.9±1.8 23.6±1.6 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ 7
Uyama 2012[15] 日本 前瞻 2009—2010 225 25 156/69 14/11 22.0±3.1 22.6±3.1 cT1 8
Eom 2012[16] 韩国 回顾 2009—2010 62 30 41/21 21/9 24.1 24.2 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ 6
Pugliese 2010[17] 意大利 回顾 2000—2009 52 18 未提及 未提及 未提及 未提及 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 5
Kim 2010[18] 韩国 回顾 2007—2008 11 16 10/1 10/6 21.3±3.4 25.3±2.5 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ 5
Song 2009[19] 韩国 回顾 2005—2006 20 20 13/7 8/12 22.4±2.1 23.4±2.1 Ⅰ、Ⅱ 6
图1 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术手术时间的Meta分析结果
图2 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中失血量的Meta分析结果
图3 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后首次进食时间的Meta分析结果
图4 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后住院时间的Meta分析结果
图5 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后首次排气时间的Meta分析结果
图6 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫数目的Meta分析结果
图7 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后总并发症的Meta分析结果
图8 术后总并发症发生率的漏斗图
[1]
杨昆，胡建昆，余佩武, 等. 中国腹腔镜胃癌根治手术质量控制专家共识(2017版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(6): 539-547.
[2]
China NHCOTPRO. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer 2018 (English version)[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2019, 31(5): 707-737.
[3]
Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(20): 1983-1992.
[4]
Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5(4): 506-513.
[5]
Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage A or B gastriccancer (JCOG0912): A multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(2): 142-151.
[6]
彭鸿. 机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对比分析[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2018.
[7]
李松岩，宋林杰，那兴邦,等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2根治Billroth Ⅰ吻合术治疗胃癌效果比较[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2018, 32(3): 245-247.
[8]
Hong S, Son S, Shin H, et al. Can robotic gastrectomy surpass laparoscopic gastrectomy by acquiring long-term experience? A propensity score analysis of a 7-year experience at a single institution[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2016, 16(4): 240-246.
[9]
Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Trallori G, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective comparative mono-institutional study[J]. BMC Surg, 2016, 16(1): 65.
[10]
Kim Y, Reim D, Park JY, et al. Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(4): 1547-1552.
[11]
Lee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, et al. Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(11): 3251-3260.
[12]
Seo HS, Shim JH, Jeon HM, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 194(2): 361-366.
[13]
Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M. Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(4): 1180-1187.
[14]
赵坤，潘华峰，王刚,等. 达芬奇手术机器人与腹腔镜行远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对照研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2013, 33(4): 325-327.
[15]
Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, et al. Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: technique and initial experience[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(2): 331-337.
[16]
Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, et al. Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2012, 38(1): 57-63.
[17]
Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, et al. Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(10): 2594-2602.
[18]
Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(3): 610-615.
[19]
Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, et al. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6): 1204-1211.
[20]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(1): 1-19.
[21]
Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A phaseⅢ study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage A/B gastric Cancer (JCOG0912)[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2013, 43(3): 324-327.
[22]
Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phaseⅢ study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinicalstage A/B gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(4): 699-708.
[23]
Bobo Z, Xin W, Jiang L, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1033-1048.
[24]
Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, et al. Initial experience of robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(7): 1303-1310.
[25]
Kandil EH, Noureldine SI, Yao L, et al. Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: An examination of the first one hundred cases[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 214(4): 558-564; discussion 564-566.
[26]
Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, et al. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers[J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(9): 1086-1092.
[27]
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, et al. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(6): 927-932.
[28]
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and updated Meta-analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 93.
[29]
符清胜，吴克盛，赵军, 等. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术安全性与可行性对比的Meta分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(1): 11-18.
[30]
Kim MC, Kim KH, Kim HH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2005, 91(1): 90-94.
[31]
余佩武，郝迎学. 机器人优于2D和3D腹腔镜[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(8): 767-768.
[32]
Guerrini GP, Esposito G, Magistri P, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the largest meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 82: 210-228.
[33]
Kim YW, Reim D, Park JY, et al. Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(4): 1547-1552.
[34]
Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, et al. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9): 2606-2615.
[35]
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and updated Meta-analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 93.
[36]
Nelen SD, Bosscha K, Lemmens VEPP, et al. Morbidity and mortality according to age following gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(9): 1163-1170.
[37]
Yasuda T, Sugimura K, Yamasaki M, et al. Ten cases of gastro-tracheobronchial fistula: A serious complication after esophagectomy and reconstruction using posterior mediastinal gastric tube[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2012, 25(8): 687-693.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术（TAPP）[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[15] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号