切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 326 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.05.002

论著

腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃部分切除术治疗早期胃中部癌近期疗效分析
吴丰信1,(), 吴英光1, 俞建雄2, 王胜3   
  1. 1. 572700 昌江,武汉大学人民医院昌江医疗集团外一科
    2. 430000 武汉大学人民医院胃肠外一科
    3. 571700 儋州,海南西部中心医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-08 出版日期:2021-09-28
  • 通信作者: 吴丰信
  • 基金资助:
    海南省卫生计生行业科研项目(18A200112)

Laparoscopic assisted pylorus preserving gastrectomy in the treatment of early middle gastric cancer

Fengxin Wu1,(), Yingguang Wu1, Jianxiong Yu2, Sheng Wang3   

  1. 1. The First Department of Surgery, Changjiang Healthcare Group, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Changjiang 572700, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Hainan Western Central Hospital, Danzhou 571700, China
  • Received:2021-05-08 Published:2021-09-28
  • Corresponding author: Fengxin Wu
引用本文:

吴丰信, 吴英光, 俞建雄, 王胜. 腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃部分切除术治疗早期胃中部癌近期疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 326-330.

Fengxin Wu, Yingguang Wu, Jianxiong Yu, Sheng Wang. Laparoscopic assisted pylorus preserving gastrectomy in the treatment of early middle gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 326-330.

目的

研究腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃部分切除术(PPG)治疗早期胃中部癌近期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2018年6月至2020年12月于武汉大学人民医院昌江医疗集团行腹腔镜手术治疗的早期胃中部癌患者94例。根据手术方式的不同,41例行腹腔镜辅助PPG设为观察组,53例行腹腔镜下远端胃切除术设为对照组。比较两组患者围手术期指标、肿瘤学指标及术后并发症发生情况。随访比较两组患者生存情况以及术后3个月营养学指标变化情况。

结果

两组患者术中出血量、排气时间、引流管拔管时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义。观察组手术时间长于对照组,近端肿瘤切缘及远端肿瘤切缘较对照组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者切口感染、肺部感染、胃排空延迟、反流性食管炎、吻合口狭窄及并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。随访19(3~33)个月,均无死亡、肿瘤复发及转移发生。术后3个月,两组患者的血清白蛋白、血红蛋白及体质指数均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),而观察组患者三项营养指标水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜辅助PPG治疗早期胃中部癌兼具安全性、可行性,近期临床疗效满意,值得临床尝试并推广。

Objective

To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted pylorus preserving gastrectomy (PPG) in the treatment of early middle gastric cancer.

Methods

From June 2018 to December 2020, 94 patients with early middle gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery in Changjiang Healthcare Group of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different operation methods, 41 patients were the observation group (laparoscopic-assisted PPG) and 53 patients were the control group (laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy). The perioperative indexes, oncology indexes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The survival and nutritional indexes of the two groups were compared after follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, exhaust time, drainage tube extubation time, the number of lymph node dissection and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, proximal and distal tumor margins of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of incision infection, pulmonary infection, delayed gastric emptying, reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis and the total incidence of complications between the two groups. All patients were followed up for 19 (3-33) months, and no death, tumor recurrence or metastasis occurred. Three months after surgery, the serum albumin, hemoglobin and body mass index of the two groups were significantly decreased compared with those before surgery (P<0.05), while the three nutritional indexes of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic-assisted PPG is safe and feasible in the treatment of early middle gastric cancer, with satisfactory clinical efficacy in the near future, which is worthy of clinical trial and promotion.

表1 94例早期胃中部癌患者临床基本资料
表2 两组早期胃中部癌患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组早期胃中部癌患者肿瘤学指标比较(±s
表4 两组早期胃中部癌患者营养指标比较(±s
[1]
谢怡, 叶劲松. 早期胃癌临床病理特征与淋巴结转移的关系及其对预后的影响[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2020, 23(11): 866-869.
[2]
中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟. 中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟数据报告(2014—2016)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 90-93.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会胃肠学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肿瘤外科学组, 中国医师学会外科医师分会上消化道学组, 等. 中国胃癌保功能手术外科专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(5): 377-382.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会胃肠外科学组. 保留幽门胃切除手术专家共识及操作指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(5): 412-418.
[5]
Maki T, Shiratori T, Hatafuku T, et al. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy as an improved operation for gastric ulcer[J]. Surgery, 1967, 61(6): 838-845.
[6]
王超杰, 徐佳, 赵刚. 早期胃癌行功能保留手术的价值和关键环节[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(5): 451-454.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会. 腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2016版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(9): 851-857.
[8]
中国胃肠肿瘤外科联盟, 中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会. 中国胃肠肿瘤外科术后并发症诊断登记规范专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(6): 589-595.
[9]
赵恩昊, 赵刚, 曹晖. 中国、日本和韩国微创理念下的胃功能保留手术开展的现状与思考[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(2): 132-137.
[10]
Aizawa M, Honda M, Hiki N, et al. Oncological outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A multicenter propensity score matched cohort analysis comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy versus conventional distal gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(4): 709-717.
[11]
日本胃癌学会. 胃癌取扱ぃ規約[M]. 15版. 东京:金原出版株式会社, 2017.
[12]
Mizuno A, Shinohara H, Haruta S, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the infrapyloric artery may be dispensable when performing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early middle-third gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(3): 543-547.
[13]
赵刚, 徐佳, 王书昌. 保留功能胃切除术的争议与共识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(2): 158-162.
[14]
周家杰, 汪刘华, 李东亮,等. 保留幽门胃切除术后胃排空功能障碍的原因及防治[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 228-231.
[15]
Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. Excellent long-term prognosis and favorable postoperative nutritional status after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(8): 2233-2240.
[16]
Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, et al. Postoperative quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: A cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 213(4): 763-770.
[17]
杜耀, 李卫平, 熊辉, 等. 保留幽门胃切除术治疗早期胃中部癌有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(11): 1088-1096.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[13] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[14] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[15] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
阅读次数
全文


摘要