切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 472 -480. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.06.016

循证医学

全程新辅助治疗与标准治疗对局部进展期直肠癌疗效的Meta分析
高瞻鹏1, 姬哲1, 董胜利1,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-21 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 董胜利

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer

Zhanpeng Gao1, Zhe Ji1, Shengli Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2021-07-21 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Shengli Dong
引用本文:

高瞻鹏, 姬哲, 董胜利. 全程新辅助治疗与标准治疗对局部进展期直肠癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 472-480.

Zhanpeng Gao, Zhe Ji, Shengli Dong. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 472-480.

目的

对全程新辅助治疗(TNT)在局部进展期直肠癌治疗中的疗效进行Meta分析,以期对临床治疗决策提供参考依据。

方法

通过检索中国知网、万方数据、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase数据库,收集从2003年1月至2021年1月所有对比TNT与标准治疗(将新辅助同步放化疗/术前短程放疗+全直肠系膜切除术+术后辅助化疗模式统称为标准治疗)的文献,试验组为TNT,对照组为标准治疗。筛选出合格的文献进行质量评估,并提取相关的数据和资料,采用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入14篇文献3 352例患者,包括试验组1 688例,对照组1 664例。与对照组相比,试验组病理完全缓解(pCR)率更高(OR=1.87,95% CI:1.56~2.25,P<0.001),R0切除率更高(OR=1.37,95% CI:1.07~1.76,P=0.01),无病生存期(DFS)(HR=0.85,95% CI:0.74~0.98,P=0.02)与总生存期(OS)(HR=0.73,95% CI:0.62~0.85,P<0.001)更优;两组肿瘤降期、3~4级不良事件、保肛率、总并发症发生率、吻合口漏和切口感染发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义。

结论

对于局部进展期直肠癌患者,TNT尽管与标准治疗相比未显著改善OS和DFS,但明显提高了肿瘤的pCR率和R0切除率,是安全可行的。

Objective

A Meta-analysis is conducted on the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, in order to provide reference for clinical treatment decision-making.

Methods

By searching CNKI, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases from January 2003 to January 2021, all literatures comparing TNT with standard treatment (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy/preoperative short-course radiotherapy + total mesorectum excision + postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy collectively referred to as standard treatment) were collected. The trial group was TNT, and the control group was standard treatment. Qualified literatures were selected and literature quality was evaluated, relevant data and materials were extracted for Meta-analysis with RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 3 352 patients in 14 literatures were included. There were 1 688 cases in the trial group and 1 664 cases in the control group. Compared to the control group, the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in the trial group was higher (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.56-2.25, P<0.001), R0 resection rate was higher (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.07-1.76, P=0.01), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98; P=0.02) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85; P<0.001) were better. There were no significant differences in tumor descending stage, grade 3-4 adverse events, anus preserving rate, overall complications of operation, anastomotic fistula and incision infection between the two groups.

Conclusion

For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, although TNT can’t significantly improve OS and DFS, it significantly improved the pCR rate and R0 resection rate, which is safe and feasible.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 NOS量表评价非随机对照研究
图2 纳入研究的偏倚风险评价结果
表2 纳入文献的基本特征
第一作者 年份 研究类型 新辅助资料方案 例数 临床T分期 临床N分期 肿瘤至肛缘距离[例(%) ] 中位随访时间 结局指示
T3-4 [例(%)] N+ [例(%)] <5 5-10 >10 (月)
Femandez-Martos 2010 随机对照研究 XELOX x 4→CRT→Sx 试验56 25(44.6) NR       69 ①②③④ ⑤⑥⑦⑧ ⑨
      CRT→Sx→XELOX 对照52 15(22.8) NR        
Marechal 2012 随机对照研究 FOLFOXx 2→CRT→Sx 试验28 27(96.0) 26(93.0) 11(39.3) 13(46.4) 4(14.3) NR ①②⑥⑧ ⑨⑩
      CRT→Sx 对照29 26(89.0) 25(86.0) 13(44.8) 9(31.0) 7(24.1)  
杨翠颜 2015 随机对照研究 CRT+XELOX x 1→Sx 试验40 40(100.0) 28(70.0)   NR   29 ①⑧⑨
      CRT→Sx 对照40 40(100.0) 24(60.0)       27
Bujko 2016 随机对照研究 SCRT→FOLFOX x 3→Sx 试验261 261(100.0) NR 148(56.7) 106(40.6) 7(2.7) 35 ①②③④ ⑥⑧
      CRT→Sx 对照254 254(100.0) NR 138(54.3) 99(39.0) 16(6.3)  
李雷蕾 2017 随机对照研究 CRT+FOLFOX4 x 4→Sx→FOLFOX4 x 4 试验40 40(100.0) 25(62.5) 14(35.0) 26(65.0) NR 30 ①②④ ⑤⑨
      CRT→Sx→ FOLFOX 4 x 8 对照40 40(100.0) 29(72.5) 19(47.5) 21(52.5) NR  
Moor 2017 随机对照研究 CRT→5FU x 3→Sx 试验25 25(100.0) 25(100)   NR   NR ①②⑧⑨
      CRT→Sx 对照24 23(95.8) 22(91.7)        
Kim 2018 随机对照研究 CRT一XELOX x2→Sx 试验53 53(100.0) 49(92.5)   NR   26 ①②⑤ ⑥⑦
      CRT→Sx 对照55 55(100.0) 51(92.7)        
Conroy 2020 随机对照研究 FOLFIRINOX x 6→CRT→Sx→ FOLFOX x 6 试验231 231(100.0) 206(89.2) 87(37.7) 114(49.3) 30(13.0) 46.5 ①③④⑥
      CRT→Sx→FOLFOX x 12 对照230 230(100.0) 207(90.0) 83(36.1) 118(51.3) 29(12.6)  
Bahadoer 2021 随机对照研究 SCRT→XELOX x 6/FOLFOX x 9→Sx 试验462 448(97.0) 420(90.9) 103(22.4) 180(39.1) 32(6.9) 54 ①②③ ④⑥
      CRT→Sx→CT x 6m 对照450 436(6.9) 415(92.2) 114(25.8) 148(33.6) 21(4.8)  
Bhatti 2015 回顾性研究 CAPOX x4→CRT→Sx 试验93 82(88.2) 84(90.3) 65(69.9) 28(30.1)   45 ①②③④
      CRT→Sx 对照61 57(93.4) 46(75.4) 47(77.0) 14(23.0)    
Cercek 2018 回顾性研究 FOLFOX/CAPOX/FLOX x 4m→CRT→Sx 试验308 287(93.2) 265(86.0) 102(33.1) 143(46.4) 63(20.5) 23
      CRT→Sx 对照320 297(92.8) 226(70.6) 98(30.6) 175(54.7) 47(14.7) 40
Liang 2019 回顾性研究 CRT→CAP/CAPOX/FOLFOX→Sx 试验76 76(100.0) 62(81.2) 47(61.8) 29(31.2) NR 31 ①②③④ ⑦⑧⑨
      CRT→Sx 对照80 80(100.0) 68(85.0) 43(53.8) 37(46.2) NR  
Zhai 2020 回顾性研究 CapOX x 1→CRT→ CapOX x 2→Sx 试验79 73(92.4) 73(92.4) 43(54.4) 29(36.7) 7(6.9) NR ①②⑤⑦ ⑧⑨⑩
      CRT→Sx 对照55 52(94.5) 52(94.5) 28(50.9) 21(38.2) 6(10.9)  
Cui 2020 回顾性研究 CRT→XELOX x 2→Sx 试验83 83(100.0) 83(100.0)   NR   NR ①⑤⑦⑧ ⑨⑩
      CRT→Sx 对照61 61(100.0) 61(100.0)        
图3 两组患者病理完全缓解(pCR)率的Meta分析森林图
图4 两组患者R0切除率的Meta分析森林图
图5 两组患者无病生存期(DFS)的Meta分析森林图
图6 两组患者总生存期(OS)的Meta分析森林图
图7 两组患者肿瘤降期的Meta分析森林图
图8 两组患者3~4级不良事件发生率的Meta分析森林图
图9 两组患者保肛率的Meta分析森林图
图10 两组患者手术总体并发症的Meta分析森林图
图11 两组患者吻合口漏的Meta分析森林图
图12 两组患者切口感染的Meta分析森林图
图13 两组患者病理完全缓解(pCR)率的Meta分析漏斗图
[1]
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917.
[2]
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(7): 874-901.
[3]
Breugom AJ, Swets M, Bosset JF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery for patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of individual patient data[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(2): 200-207.
[4]
Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, et al. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(2): 184-190.
[5]
Ogura A, Konishi T, Cunningham C, et al. Neoadjuvant (Chemo) radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision only is not sufficient to prevent lateral local recurrence in enlarged nodes: results of the multicenter lateral node study of patients with low cT3/4 rectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(1): 33-43.
[6]
Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, et al. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(8): 979-989.
[7]
Terzi C, Bingul M, Arslan NC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of 8 weeks' vs 12 weeks' interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2020, 22(3): 279-288.
[8]
Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Losa F, et al. Effect of aflibercept plus modified FOLFOX6 induction chemotherapy before standard chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with high-risk rectal adenocarcinoma: the GEMCAD 1402 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5(11): 1566-1573.
[9]
Lim YJ, Kim Y, Kong M. Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 10008.
[10]
Dossa F, Acuna SA, Rickles AS, et al. Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(7): 930-937.
[11]
Mroczkowski P, Dziki L. Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer - improvement or overtreatment?[J]. Br J Surg, 2019, 106(11): 1558.
[12]
Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, et al. Phase Ⅱ, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer: Grupo cancer de recto 3 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(5): 859-865.
[13]
Maréchal R, Vos B, Polus M, et al. Short course chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: A randomized multicentric phase Ⅱ study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(6): 1525-1530.
[14]
Bhatti AB, Waheed A, Hafeez A, et al. Can induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation impact circumferential resection margin positivity and survival in low rectal cancers?[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015, 16(7): 2993-2998.
[15]
杨翠颜,雷建,黄炯强, 等. 巩固化疗对局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(14): 2348-2350.
[16]
Bujko K, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, et al. Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase Ⅲ study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27(5): 834-842.
[17]
Moore J, Price T, Carruthers S, et al. Prospective randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the 'wait period’ following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: results of the WAIT trial[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(11): 973-979.
[18]
李雷蕾,王文玲,董洪敏, 等. 局部进展期直肠癌术前同步放化疗后联合新辅助化疗的前瞻性Ⅱ期随机对照研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2017, 37(2): 107-113.
[19]
Cercek A, Roxburgh C, Strombom P, et al. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(6): e180071.
[20]
Kim SY, Joo J, Kim TW, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of consolidation chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus chemoradiation therapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer: KCSG CO 14-03[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2018, 101(4): 889-899.
[21]
Liang HQ, Dong ZY, Liu ZJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy during the resting period in patients with local advanced rectal cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 17(2): 1655-1663.
[22]
Conroy T, Lamfichekh N, Etienne PL, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus preoperative chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: final results of PRODIGE 23 phase Ⅲ trial, a UNICANCER GI trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(15): 4007.
[23]
Cui J, Dou X, Sun Y, et al. Consolidation chemotherapy may improve pathological complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective study[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8: e9513.
[24]
Zhai ZW, Zhang KN, Wang C, et al. Comparison of short-term efficacy and perioperative safety between neoadjuvant therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2020, 23(3): 274-280.
[25]
Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, et al. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(1): 29-42.
[26]
Fernandez-Martos C, Fadrique AG, Glynne-Jones R. Optimal sequencing of neoadjuvant therapies (NAT) in rectal cancer: upfront chemotherapy vs. upfront chemoradiation[J]. Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, 2017, 13(2): 154-164.
[27]
肖巍魏,陈功. 全程新辅助治疗:局部进展期直肠癌的术前治疗新策略[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2017, 24(11): 1311-1315.
[28]
Omejc M, Potisek M. Prognostic significance of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy[J]. Radiol Oncol, 2018, 52(1): 30-35.
[29]
Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Cabiddu M, et al. Pathologic complete response and disease-free survival are not surrogate endpoints for 5-year survival in rectal cancer: An analysis of 22 randomized trials[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2017, 8(1): 39-48.
[30]
García-Aguilar J, Hernandez de Anda E, Sirivongs P, et al. A pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiation is associated with lower local recurrence and improved survival in rectal cancer patients treated by mesorectal excision[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46(3): 298-304.
[31]
Maas M, Nelemans P J, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(9): 835-844.
[32]
Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(34): 8688-8696.
[33]
张林,俞亮,武云龙, 等. 局部晚期直肠癌行改良全程新辅助治疗后外科手术的安全性和有效性[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(6): 501-506.
[34]
Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicentre, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(8): 957-966.
[35]
Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, et al. A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(8): 933-940.
[36]
Simillis C, Baird DL, Kontovounisios C, et al. A Systematic review to assess resection margin status after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 291-299.
[37]
Collette L, Bosset JF, den Dulk M, et al. Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(28): 4379-4386.
[38]
Park IJ, You YN, Agarwal A, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(15): 1770-1776.
[39]
Fokas E, Allgäuer M, Polat B, et al. Randomized Phase Ⅱ trial of chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: CAO/ARO/AIO-12[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(34): 3212-3222.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[3] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[4] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[9] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[10] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[15] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要