切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 188 -193. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.03.006

论著

超声引导下射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗直径≤5 cm尾状叶肝细胞癌的临床对比研究
崔邦汉1,(), 胡军2, 王兴麟2, 伍丽媛1, 陈秋月2   
  1. 1. 571400 琼海市人民医院超声科
    2. 571400 琼海市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-11 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 崔邦汉
  • 基金资助:
    海南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(819QN372)

Comparative study of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic caudate lobectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with diameter ≤ 5 cm

Banghan Cui1,(), Jun Hu2, Xinglin Wang2, Liyuan Wu1, Qiuyue Chen2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Qionghai People’s Hospital, Qionghai 571400, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Qionghai People’s Hospital, Qionghai 571400, China
  • Received:2021-11-11 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Banghan Cui
引用本文:

崔邦汉, 胡军, 王兴麟, 伍丽媛, 陈秋月. 超声引导下射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗直径≤5 cm尾状叶肝细胞癌的临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 188-193.

Banghan Cui, Jun Hu, Xinglin Wang, Liyuan Wu, Qiuyue Chen. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic caudate lobectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with diameter ≤ 5 cm[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 188-193.

目的

对比探究超声引导下射频消融(RFA)对直径≤5 cm尾状叶肝细胞癌的治疗效果,分析其临床应用的可行性及价值。

方法

回顾性选取2016年1月至2020年12月于本院肝胆外科接受治疗的直径≤5 cm尾状叶肝细胞癌患者44例,根据治疗方式分为消融组18例(行超声引导下RFA)和切除组26例(行腹腔镜肝尾状叶切除术)。评估RFA消融效果和完全消融率;对比两组围手术期指标、手术前后肝功能指标变化、术后并发症及随访生存情况。

结果

消融组术后一次完全消融率为83.3%(15/18),补充消融后的完全消融率为100.0%,消融次数为1~2(1.3±0.4)次。消融组手术时间、肝功能恢复时间、术后住院时间均少于切除组,差异有统计学意义(t=19.053、10.517、12.590,均P<0.001)。术后两组总胆红素(TBIL)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)及天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平呈先升后降趋势,其中消融组术后1、3、7 d时的TBIL、ALT、AST水平均低于同期切除组(P<0.05)。消融组术后发生Clavien-DindoⅠ~Ⅱ级并发症2例(11.1%),切除组发生Clavien-DindoⅠ~Ⅱ级5例(19.2%),Ⅲ~Ⅳ级2例(7.7%),两组术后并发症总发生率以及Clavien-Dindo分级比较差异无统计学意义。消融组术后1、3、5年累积无瘤生存率分别为94.4%、65.2%、34.2%,累积总生存率分别为94.4%、69.3%、50.6%;切除组术后1、3、5年累积无瘤生存率分别为88.5%、61.3%、30.4%,累积总生存率分别为92.3%、65.5%、46.3%。两组累积无瘤生存率与累积总生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.030,P=0.862;χ2=0.067,P=0.796)。

结论

超声引导下RFA治疗直径≤5 cm尾状叶肝细胞癌安全可行,总体疗效与手术切除相近,同时可减少患者创伤,促进术后肝功能恢复,缩短住院时间。

Objective

To compare and explore the therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with diameter ≤ 5 cm, and analyze the feasibility and value of its clinical application.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2020, 44 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with diameter ≤ 5 cm treated in Qionghai People’s Hospital were retrospectively selected. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into ablation group (18 cases, with RFA under ultrasound guidance) and resection group (26 cases, with laparoscopic caudate lobectomy). The RFA effect and complete ablation rate were evaluated. The perioperative indexes, changes of liver function indexes before and after operation, postoperative complications and follow-up survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

In the ablation group, the complete ablation rate was 83.3% (15/18), the complete ablation rate after supplementary ablation was 100.0%, and the number of ablation time were 1-2 (1.3±0.4). The operation time, liver function recovery time and postoperative hospital stay in the ablation group were shorter than those in the resection group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=19.053, 10.517, 12.590; all P<0.001). The levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the two groups increased at first and then decreased after operation. The levels of TBIL, ALT and AST in the ablation group at 1, 3 and 7 days after operation were lower than those in the resection group contemporaneously (P<0.05). There were 2 cases (11.1%) of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ in the ablation group, 5 cases (19.2%) of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and 2 cases (7.7%) of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ in the resection group, with no significant differences in the total incidence of postoperative complications and Clavien-Dindo grade between the two groups. In the ablation group, the cumulative 1, 3, 5-year tumor free survival rates were 94.4%, 65.2%, 34.2%, and the cumulative overall survival rates were 94.4%, 69.3%, 50.6%, respectively. In the resection group, the cumulative 1, 3, 5-year disease-free survival rates were 88.5%, 61.3%, 30.4%, and the cumulative overall survival rates were 92.3%, 65.5%, and 46.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the cumulative disease-free survival rate and cumulative overall survival rate between the two groups (χ2=0.030, P=0.862; χ2=0.067, P=0.796).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided RFA is safe and feasible for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with diameter ≤ 5 cm, which can reduce the trauma of patients, accelerate the recovery of postoperative liver function, shorten the length of hospital stay, and the overall efficacy is similar to that of surgical resection.

表1 44例尾状叶肝细胞癌患者一般资料
表2 两组尾状叶肝细胞癌患者围手术期相关指标比较(±s)
图1 两组尾状叶肝细胞癌患者手术前后肝功能指标变化趋势 A为总胆红素(TBIL);B为谷丙转氨酶(ALT);C为天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST);*P<0.05
表3 两组尾状叶肝细胞癌患者手术前后肝功能指标变化(±s)
图2 两组尾状叶肝细胞癌患者术后生存曲线分析 A、B分别为累积总生存率和累积无瘤生存率
[1]
Maki H, Sakamoto Y, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Anatomical boundary between the caudate lobe of the liver and adjacent segments based on three-dimensional analysis for precise resections[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(10): 1709-1714.
[2]
张汉洋, 庄志彬, 林春冬, 等. 经皮射频消融术与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗原发性小肝癌的疗效及预后比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(1): 24-30.
[3]
Song KD, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. Hepatic resection vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma abutting right diaphragm[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2019, 11(3): 227-237.
[4]
马履翔, 张雪松. 超声引导下经皮射频消融治疗小肝癌患者疗效及预后分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019, 22(1): 125-128.
[5]
刘俊杰, 谷昊. 尾状叶肝癌射频消融治疗新进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(11): 2574-2578.
[6]
国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(2): 81-96.
[7]
Lee BC, Liu KL, Wu CH, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(11): 1699-1707.
[8]
贺需旗, 李凯, 曾庆劲, 等. 超声引导下肝尾状叶恶性肿瘤经皮射频消融治疗初探[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2017, 26(8): 693-697.
[9]
梁勇, 廖波, 李春林, 等. 腹腔镜下肝癌切除术与射频消融术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2019, 26(6): 671-674.
[10]
李佳莹, 张秋丽, 张修礼. 射频消融在早期肝癌治疗中的应用进展[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2011, 11(5): 226-228.
[11]
刘猛, 季节, 李文奇. 射频消融与手术切除治疗小肝细胞癌疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 6(4): 285-288.
[12]
李春丽, 董巧云, 侯丽, 等. 二次切除手术与经皮射频消融治疗切除后复发性肝细胞肝癌的临床疗效和预后分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2019, 16(12): 47-51.
[13]
Jiang C, Liu B, Chen S, et al. Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(8): 1135-1141.
[14]
Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, et al. Shrinkage of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: analysis of contributing factors[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(2): e0210667.
[15]
朱瑞利, 周艳召, 李庆军, 等. 超声引导经皮射频消融治疗肝尾状叶肿瘤的研究[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2019, 42(9): 795-800.
[16]
李祺, 刘纯城, 高海德, 等. 超声引导下经皮射频消融与手术切除治疗尾状叶肝细胞癌的疗效比较[J]. 肝脏, 2020, 25(7): 693-694, 698.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 郝玥萦, 毛盈譞, 张羽, 汪佳旭, 韩林霖, 匡雯雯, 孟瑶, 杨秀华. 超声引导衰减参数成像评估肝脂肪变性及其对心血管疾病风险的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 770-777.
[3] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[4] 马旦杰, 黄品同, 徐琛, 周芳芳, 潘敏强. 超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.
[5] 曹琨芃, 王昕玥, 吴柳希, 邓红艳, 李璐, 徐超丽, 叶新华. 淋巴瘤患者超声引导下颈内静脉置管术后静脉血栓形成的危险因素评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 310-318.
[6] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[7] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[8] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[9] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[10] 杨晓宇, 王佳, 张维峰, 陈雨辰. 两种腹横肌平面阻滞方法在老年择期腹股沟疝修补术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-325.
[11] 李盼, 韦登飞, 乔克坤, 李熊刚. 超声引导下骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 326-330.
[12] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[13] 陆知非, 华永飞, 姜哲康, 高过, 江寅, 王高卿. 初始不可切除肝癌转化治疗的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 268-274.
[14] 陈轶维, 吴近近, 李奋, 孙彦隽, 郁夏风. 儿童左心耳起源房性心动过速镶嵌治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 185-188.
[15] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?