切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 332 -335. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.05.003

论著

预防性回肠造口对直肠前切除术后吻合口瘘及低位前切除综合征的影响分析
管佳佳, 骆杰, 傅军, 杭群, 朱磊磊, 朱冰()   
  1. 233004 蚌埠医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-25 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 朱冰
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021zd0090)

Effect of prophylactic stoma on postoperative anastomotic fistula and low anterior resection syndrome after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Jun Fu, Qun Hang, Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
  • Received:2022-12-25 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Zhu
引用本文:

管佳佳, 骆杰, 傅军, 杭群, 朱磊磊, 朱冰. 预防性回肠造口对直肠前切除术后吻合口瘘及低位前切除综合征的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 332-335.

Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Jun Fu, Qun Hang, Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu. Effect of prophylactic stoma on postoperative anastomotic fistula and low anterior resection syndrome after anterior resection for rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 332-335.

目的

探讨预防性回肠造口对直肠前切除术后吻合口瘘及低位前切除综合征(LARS)的影响。

方法

收集2018年12月至2020年12月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院行腹腔镜下中低位直肠癌前切除手术的245例患者资料,根据是否一期行预防性回肠造口分为常规组(161例)及造口组(84例),比较两组吻合口瘘发生率、二次手术率、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后3、6、12个月时LARS评分的变化。

结果

造口组吻合口瘘发生率显著低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(3.57% vs 12.42%,χ2=5.084,P=0.024);而两组二次手术率(0 vs 2.48%)、术后住院时间[(8.42±0.86) d vs (8.68±1.15) d]、平均住院费用[(5.42±0.36)万元vs(5.54±0.89)万元]差异无统计学意义。造口组术后3、6个月时的LARS评分分别为(25.5±2.4)分、(20.5±2.3)分,显著低于同期常规组的(34.3±4.1)分、(28.8±2.7)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=18.109、23.991,均P<0.001),但两组术后12个月时的LARS评分差异无统计学意义[(18.5±1.5)分vs (18.9±1.8)分,t=1.745,P=0.082]。

结论

直肠前切除术中行预防性回肠造口,短期内可改善中低位直肠癌患者LARS评分和降低吻合口瘘检出率,但患者长期临床受益较少,可选择性开展。

Objective

To investigate the effect of prophylactic stoma on anastomotic fistula and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 245 cases with middle and low rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer from December 2018 to December 2020 were collected. According to whether prophylactic ileostomy was performed, the patients were divided into two groups: routine group (161 cases) and stoma group (84 cases). The detection rate of anastomotic fistula, rate of secondary operation, length and costs of hospitalization, and score of LARS at 3-, 6-, 12-month after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

The rate of anastomotic fistula in the stoma group was significantly lower than that in the routine group (3.57% vs 12.42%, χ2=5.084, P=0.024). There were no significant differences in the rate of secondary operation (0 vs 2.48%), length of hospitalization [(8.42±0.86) d vs (8.68±1.15) d] and average costs of hospitalization [(5.42±0.36)×104 yuan vs (5.54±0.89)×104 yuan] between the two groups. The score of LARS in the stoma group was significantly lower than that in the routine group at postoperatively 3-month [(25.5±2.4) vs (34.3±4.1), t=18.109, P<0.001] and 6-month [(20.5±2.3) vs (28.8±2.7), t=23.991, P<0.001], but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12-month postoperatively [(18.5±1.5) vs (18.9±1.8), t=1.745, P=0.082] .

Conclusion

Prophylactic stoma in anterior rectal resection can improve LARS score and reduce the probability of anastomotic fistula in patients with middle and low rectal cancer in the short term, but patients can not have long-term benefit, which can be carried out selectively in clinic.

表1 两组中低位直肠前切除术患者一般资料比较
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[2]
Garfinkle R, Wong-Chong N, Petrucci A, et al. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2019, 21(5): 523-531.
[3]
中国医师协会肛肠医师分会造口专业委员会, 中国医师协会肛肠医师分会, 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 等. 中低位直肠癌手术预防性肠造口中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(6): 471-478.
[4]
Lee BC, Lim SB, Lee JL, et al. Defunctioning protective stoma can reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients[J]. Ann Coloproctol, 2020, 36(3): 192-197.
[5]
Snijders HS, van Leersum NJ, Henneman D, et al. Optimal treatment strategy in rectal cancer surgery: should we be cowboys or chickens?[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(11): 3582-3589.
[6]
李昀昊, 林国乐, 李昌龙, 等. 新辅助放疗和预防性造口对中低位直肠癌根治术后吻合口漏发生率的影响[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(6): 498-504.
[7]
叶颖江, 蒋洪朋. 系统评价预防性造口、术前放疗和肠系膜下动脉结扎水平对直肠癌术后吻合口漏发生的影响[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(4): 448-455.
[8]
李薇, 于威, 刘铜军, 等. 临时回肠造口在预防低位直肠癌术后吻合口瘘中的应用价值[J].中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(1): 64-65.
[9]
张明光, 姜争, 刘正, 等. 回肠预防性造口:是福还是祸?[J]. 空军军医大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 255-258.
[10]
Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2022, 24(3): 264-276.
[11]
Chow A, ilney HS, Paraskeva P, et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: A systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24(6): 711-723.
[12]
Gadan S, Floodeen H, Lindgren R, et al. Does a defunctioning stoma impair anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A 12-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(8): 800-806.
[13]
Wen R, Zheng K, Zhang Q, et al. Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2021, 12(3): 921-932.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[10] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[11] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[12] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[13] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?