切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 346 -351. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.05.006

论著

Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析
闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军()   
  1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普外分中心 国家消化系统疾病临床研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-30 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张军
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科委重大项目资金资助项目(D171100006517003); 北京市医院管理局培育计划项目(PX2020001)

Clinical diagnosis, pathological features and prognosis of Borrmann type Ⅳ gastric cancer

Xiaosheng Yan, Zhi Zheng, Yuhao Zhai, Haiqiao Zhang, Xi Wang, Xiaoye Liu, Jie Yin, Jun Zhang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2023-03-30 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Zhang
引用本文:

闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.

Xiaosheng Yan, Zhi Zheng, Yuhao Zhai, Haiqiao Zhang, Xi Wang, Xiaoye Liu, Jie Yin, Jun Zhang. Clinical diagnosis, pathological features and prognosis of Borrmann type Ⅳ gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.

目的

比较Borrmann Ⅳ型与其他分型进展期胃癌的临床诊断及病理特点,探讨影响Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌患者预后的因素。

方法

回顾性队列分析首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院2013年1月至2021年1月收治的612例进展期胃癌手术患者,比较80例(13.1%)Borrmann Ⅳ型和532例(86.9%)其他Borrmann分型胃癌患者的临床诊断及病理特点,Kaplan-Meier法描绘生存曲线,采用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析。

结果

Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌患者在年龄、胃肠道肿瘤家族史、手术方式、R0切除、肿瘤最大径、瘤体面积、肿瘤部位、组织病理类型、分化程度、浸润深度、淋巴结转移、TNM分期与其他Borrmann分型相比,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌的腹盆平扫增强CT、胃镜肉眼诊断准确性分别为80.0%、81.2%,低于其他Borrmann分型的91.4%、91.8%(均P<0.05)。Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌的胃镜首次病理活检阳性率为72.5%,明显低于其他Borrmann分型的93.7%(P<0.05)。上消化道造影对两组的诊断水平差异无统计学意义(96.2% vs 91.9%,χ2=0.593,P=0.701)。单因素和多因素分析显示,手术方式、肿瘤分布范围、脉管浸润及是否规范化疗是Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌的独立预后因素(均P<0.05)。

结论

Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌具有独特的临床病理特征,需要采用多种检查手段鉴别,手术方式、肿瘤分布范围、脉管浸润及是否规范化疗是Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌的重要预后因素。

Objective

To compare the clinicopathological and diagnositic features of Borrmann typeⅣ gastric cancer (GC) with other advanced GC and explore prognostic factors of the patients with Borrmann type Ⅳ GC.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed in 612 patients undergoing surgery for advanced GC who were admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University from January 2013 to January 2021. The clinical diagnosis and pathological features of 80 patients (13.1%) with Borrmann typeⅣ and 532 patients (86.9%) with other Borrmann types of GC were compared. Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the survival curve, and Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the univariate and multivariate survival.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in age, family history of gastrointestinal tumor, surgical method, R0 resection, maximum tumor diameter, tumor area, tumor site, histopathological type, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage among GC patients with Borrmann type Ⅳ compared with other Borrmann types (all P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy rates of enhanced CT scan and visual gastroscopy of Borrmann type Ⅳ GC were 80.0% and 81.2% respectively, lower than 91.4% and 91.8% of other Borrmann types (all P<0.05). The positive rates of first gastroscopic biopsy of Borrmann type Ⅳ GC were 72.5%, which was significantly lower than 93.7% of other Borrmann types (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic level of upper gastrointestinal tract angiography between the two groups (96.2% vs 91.9%, χ2=0.593, P=0.701). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that surgical method, tumor distribution, vascular invasion and whether to regulate chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for GC patients with Borrmann typeⅣ (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Borrmann type Ⅳ GC has unique clinicopathological characteristics, which requires multiple examination methods for identification. Surgical method, tumor distribution, vascular invasion and whether to regulate chemotherapy are important prognostic factors for Borrmann type Ⅳ GC.

表1 两组胃癌患者的临床病理资料分析
临床病理因素 研究组 对照组 统计值 P
例数 80 532    
年龄(岁) 57.46±12.86 62.21±11.24 3.459 0.001
胃肠道肿瘤家族史     13.680 <0.001
62(77.5) 485(91.2)    
18(22.5) 47(8.8)    
手术方式     -9.508 <0.001
根治 52(65.0) 510(95.9)    
姑息 11(13.8) 15(4.2)    
探查/短路 17(21.2) 7(3.9)    
R0切除a     33.346 <0.001
50(79.4) 507(96.6)    
13(20.6) 18(3.4)    
肿瘤最大径(cm) 9.23±5.11 4.99±2.36 -5.812 <0.001
瘤体面积(cm2) 60.84±66.83 17.50±17.41 -4.572 <0.001
肿瘤部位ab     48.219 <0.001
胃上部 5(7.9) 100(19.2)    
胃中部 5(7.9) 87(16.7)    
胃下部 20(31.7) 251(48.3)    
≥2个部位 33(52.4) 82(15.8)    
组织病理类型a     24.099 <0.001
高分化腺癌 1(1.6) 26(5.0)    
中分化腺癌 1(1.6) 109(20.8)    
低分化腺癌 37(58.7) 199(37.9)    
印戒细胞癌 22(34.9) 132(25.1)    
黏液腺癌 2(3.2) 59(11.2)    
混合型a     0.607 0.639
33(52.4) 257(49.0)    
30(47.6) 268(51.0)    
分化程度a     15.991 <0.001
分化型 2(3.2) 135(25.7)    
未分化型 61(96.8) 390(74.3)    
脉管浸润a     0.053 0.818
27(42.9) 233(44.4)    
36(57.1) 292(55.6)    
浸润深度a     -4.567 <0.001
T2 5(7.9) 116(22.1)    
T3 13(20.6) 198(37.7)    
T4a 36(57.1) 173(33.0)    
T4b 9(14.3) 38(7.2)    
淋巴结转移a     -4.247 <0.001
N0 10(15.9) 156(29.7)    
N1 7(11.1) 91(17.3)    
N2 13(20.6) 107(20.4)    
N3a 14(22.2) 145(27.6)    
N3b 19(30.2) 26(5.0)    
TNM分期c     -7.437 <0.001
ⅠB 2(2.5) 64(12.0)    
ⅡA 6(7.5) 80(15.0)    
ⅡB 4(5.0) 90(16.9)    
ⅢA 15(18.8) 116(21.8)    
ⅢB 10(12.5) 107(20.1)    
ⅢC 13(16.3) 68(12.8)    
30(37.5) 7(1.3)    
图1 影响Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌预后的单因素Kaplan-Meier分析结果 A为手术方式;B为肿瘤分布范围;C为R0切除;D为脉管浸润;E为是否为印戒细胞癌;F为浸润深度(T);G为淋巴结转移(N);H为TNM分期;I为是否规范化疗;*肿瘤分布范围即肿瘤浸润哪几个胃部位的情况,如肿瘤浸润胃体即肿瘤分布至1个部位
表2 影响Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌预后的Cox单因素和多因素分析
[1]
Ikoma N, Agnes A, Chen HC, et al. Linitis plastica: A distinct type of gastric cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(5): 1018-1025.
[2]
Kim JI, Kim YH, Lee KH, et al. Type-specific diagnosis and evaluation of longitudinal tumor extent of Borrmann type Ⅳ gastric cancer: CT versus gastroscopy[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2013, 14(4): 597-606.
[3]
陈红静. 胃镜下活体组织检查与外科手术病理诊断胃癌的价值研究[J/CD]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(39): 105, 107.
[4]
郑香玉. 胃镜下活体组织检查与外科手术病理诊断胃癌疾病的临床比较[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2018, 31(3): 606-608.
[5]
仝巧云, 周明东, 袁晋华, 等. 超声内镜指引下内镜黏膜切除术大块活检对Borrmann Ⅳ胃癌的诊断价值[J]. 临床荟萃, 2015, 30(8): 888-890.
[6]
Jung K, Park MI, Kim SE, et al. Borrmann type 4 advanced gastric cancer: focus on the development of scirrhous gastric cancer[J]. Clin Endosc, 2016, 49(4): 336-345.
[7]
陆伟, 何顺利. 上消化道造影和CT扫描诊断胃部肿瘤应用价值及检出率分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(4): 724-728.
[8]
Kim EY, Yoo HM, Song KY, et al. Limited significance of curative surgery in Borrmann type Ⅳ gastric cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2016, 33(7): 69.
[9]
Díaz Del Arco C, Ortega Medina L, Estrada Muñoz L, et al. Are Borrmann’s types of advanced gastric cancer distinct clinicopathological and molecularentities? A Western study[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(12): 3081.
[10]
Han Y, Xuan Y, Liu X, et al. Development of a quantitative diagnostic criterion for gastric linitis plastica: findings from a large single-institutional study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 683608.
[11]
黄嘉华,唐维,李广华,等. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌的临床病理特点及预后分析[J/CD].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2022, 14(1): 48-54.
[12]
Yamashita K, Hosoda K, Katada N, et al. Survival outcome of Borrmann typeⅣ gastric cancer potentially improved by multimodality treatment[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015, 35(2): 897-906.
[13]
Endo K, Sakurai M, Kusumoto E, et al. Biological significance of localized type Ⅳ scirrhous gastric cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2012, 3(1): 94-99.
[14]
Gao S, Cao GH, Ding P, et al. Retrospective evaluation of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion and Borrmann types in advanced proximal gastric cancer[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2019, 11(8): 642-651.
[15]
Huang JY, Wang ZN, Lu CY, et al. Borrmann type Ⅳ gastric cancer should be classified as pT4b disease[J]. J Surg Res, 2016, 203(2): 258-267.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[11] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[12] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[13] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[14] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要