切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 438 -443. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.06.007

论著

Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌行扩大肝切除与围肝门切除的临床疗效分析
李佳隆, 韩青雷, 宋铭杰, 古丽米拉·亚森江, 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 郭强, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅()   
  1. 830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院消化血管外科中心肝胆包虫病外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-30 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 邵英梅
  • 基金资助:
    省部共建中亚高发病成因与防治国家重点实验室开放课题项目(SKL-HIDCA-2020-BC); 新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划项目(XJEDU2021I016)

Clinical efficacy of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing extended hepatectomy versus perihilar hepatectomy

Jialong Li, Qinglei Han, Mingjie Song, Yasenjiang Gulimila·, Kai Zhong, Tiemin Jiang, Qiang Guo, Aji Tuerganaili·, Yingmei Shao()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Hydatidosis, Digestive and Vascular Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2023-01-30 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yingmei Shao
引用本文:

李佳隆, 韩青雷, 宋铭杰, 古丽米拉·亚森江, 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 郭强, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅. Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌行扩大肝切除与围肝门切除的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 438-443.

Jialong Li, Qinglei Han, Mingjie Song, Yasenjiang Gulimila·, Kai Zhong, Tiemin Jiang, Qiang Guo, Aji Tuerganaili·, Yingmei Shao. Clinical efficacy of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing extended hepatectomy versus perihilar hepatectomy[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 438-443.

目的

分析Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)行扩大肝切除与围肝门切除的临床疗效及预后,探讨其合理的治疗策略。

方法

采用回顾性研究的方法,收集2014年1月至2021年6月新疆医科大学第一附属医院消化血管外科中心经手术治疗的35例Bismuth-CorletteⅡ型HCCA患者的临床资料。根据手术方式的不同,分为扩大肝切除组(15例)和围肝门切除组(20例)。观察和记录术前一般资料、术中和术后情况以及随访情况。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Log-rank检验进行生存分析,并对影响患者预后的因素进行单因素和Cox比例风险模型多因素分析。

结果

两组术前一般资料和术中输血需求、血管切除重建方面差异均无统计学意义,但手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数、术后并发症比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。35例随访25(11,32)个月,扩大肝切除组1、2、3年累积生存率分别是86.7%、71.5%、59.6%,围肝门切除组分别为65.0%、43.3%、27.1%,两组术后生存率差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.799,P=0.094)。单因素分析结果显示TNM分期、血管侵犯是影响Ⅱ型HCCA患者预后的相关因素(P<0.05),以上因素经多因素分析后差异无统计学意义。

结论

扩大肝切除和围肝门切除治疗Bismuth-CorletteⅡ型HCCA都是可行的,两种手术方案具有相似的安全性与有效性,但扩大肝切除患者有长期生存率的优势。

Objective

To analyze the clinical efficacy and prognosis of extended hepatectomy and perihilar hepatectomy for Bismuth-Corlette typeⅡ hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), and to explore the reasonable treatment strategy.

Methods

This is a retrospective follow-up study. The clinical data of 35 patients with Bismuth-Corlette typeⅡ HCCA who underwent surgical treatment in the Digestive and Vascular Surgery Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2014 to June 2021 were collected. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into extended hepatectomy group (15 cases) and perihilar hepatectomy group (20 cases). General preoperative information, intraoperative and postoperative conditions, as well as follow-up data were observed and recorded. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test. Single factor and Cox proportional risk model multivariate analysis were conducted to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of patients.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative general information, intraoperative blood transfusion requirements, vascular resection and the reconstruction. However, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, and postoperative complications (P<0.05). All 35 patients were followed up for 25 (11, 32) months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative survival rates in the extended hepatectomy group were 86.7%, 71.5%, 59.6%, respectively, while those in the perihilar hepatectomy group were 65.0%, 43.3%, 27.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative survival rates between the two groups (χ2=2.799, P=0.094). The results of univariate analysis showed that TNM stage and vascular invasion were related factors affecting the prognosis of patients with type Ⅱ HCCA (P<0.05), while the above factors had no statistically significant difference after multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Both extended hepatectomy and perihilar hepatectomy for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅱ HCCA are viable. The two surgical schemes have similar safety and efficacy, but extended hepatectomy has the advantage of long-term survival in patients.

表1 两组Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者术中与术后指标比较
图1 两组Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者术后生存曲线
表3 影响Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者预后单因素分析
因素 例(%) 生存时间(月,±s) 1年生存率(%) 2年生存率(%) 3年生存率(%) χ2 P
性别           1.108 0.293
17(48.6) 49.1±8.2 70.6 61.8 61.8    
18(51.4) 31.7±6.3 77.8 50.8 25.4
年龄(岁)           0.996 0.318
<60 12(34.3) 29.1±7.7 58.3 43.7 29.2    
≥60 23(65.7) 43.5±6.9 82.6 61.6 46.9
术前总胆红素(μmol/L)           1.147 0.284
<170 26(74.3) 43.3±6.7 76.9 62.2 46.6    
≥170 9(25.7) 29.6±8.9 66.7 40.0 26.7
血清白蛋白(g/L)           0.103 0.749
>35 17(48.6) 36.3±7.3 76.5 54.5 37.4    
≤35 18(51.4) 42.1±8.1 72.2 56.9 45.5
甲胎蛋白(μg/L)           0.189 0.663
<5 27(77.1) 38.4±5.8 77.8 56.4 39.5    
≥5 8(22.9) 40.4±12.0 62.5 50.0 50.0
Child-Pugh分级           1.960 0.162
A 8(22.9) 55.4±11.0 87.5 87.5 65.6    
B 27(77.1) 34.0±5.8 70.4 47.7 34.1
术前减黄           2.153 0.142
17(48.6) 31.1±7.2 64.7 42.5 34.0    
18(51.4) 46.7±7.6 83.3 68.8 49.1
TNM分期           5.484 0.019
Ⅰ~Ⅱ 19(54.3) 50.3±7.4 89.5 73.8 55.4    
Ⅲ~Ⅳ 16(45.7) 24.9±6.3 56.3 36.5 24.3
主要合并疾病           1.024 0.312
17(48.6) 44.4±8.1 76.5 65.5 52.4    
18(51.4) 34.9±7.1 72.2 48.1 33.0
肿瘤分化程度           0.072 0.789
15(42.9) 38.9±8.0 80.0 63.6 39.8    
中或高 20(57.1) 39.1±7.5 70.0 50.1 41.8
手术方式           2.799 0.094
扩大肝切除 15(42.9) 51.3±8.1 86.7 71.5 59.6    
围肝门切除 20(57.1) 29.4±6.3 65.0 43.3 27.1
神经侵犯           2.723 0.099
26(74.3) 34.8±6.3 69.2 46.8 34.1    
9(25.7) 54.8±9.1 88.9 88.9 66.7
血管侵犯           6.940 0.008
9(25.7) 15.9±4.1 44.4 33.3 0    
26(74.3) 46.9±6.4 84.6 64.6 52.2
淋巴结转移           0.641 0.423
11(31.4) 32.0±8.6 63.6 43.6 43.6    
24(68.6) 41.7±6.6 79.2 61.7 41.1
表4 影响Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者预后多因素分析
[1]
Soares KC, Jarnagin WR. The landmark series: hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(8): 4158-4170.
[2]
Lauterio A, De Carlis R, Centonze L, et al. Current surgical management of peri-hilar and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(15): 3657.
[3]
Halder R, Amaraneni A, Shroff RT. Cholangiocarcinoma: A review of the literature and future directions in therapy[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2022, 11(4): 555-566.
[4]
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(5): 713-724.
[5]
Zhang XF, Zhang N, Tsilimigras DI, et al. Surgical strategies for Bismuth type Ⅰ and Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinoma: impact on long-term outcomes[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(12): 3084-3091.
[6]
Anderson B, Doyle M. Surgical considerations of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2019, 28(4): 601-617.
[7]
Li CX, Chen RX, Li XC. Reply to: "When should hepatectomy be performed for the treatment of Bismuth type Ⅰ and Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinoma?" [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2020, 27(Suppl 3): 928-929.
[8]
Chen RX, Li CX, Luo CH, et al. Surgical strategies for the treatment of Bismuth type Ⅰ and Ⅱ hilar cholangiocarcinoma: bile duct resection with or without hepatectomy?[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2020, 27(9): 3374-3382.
[9]
陈泰安, 熊永福, 杨发才, 等. 肝门部胆管癌外科治疗进展和争议[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(2): 133-138.
[10]
Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, et al. Left hepatectomy with combined resection and reconstruction of right hepatic artery for Bismuth type Ⅰ and Ⅱ perihilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(3): 894-901.
[11]
Nakanishi Y, Hirano S, Okamura K, et al. Correction to: Clinical and oncological benefits of left hepatectomy for Bismuth type Ⅰ/Ⅱ perihilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Surg Today, 2022, 52(5): 853.
[12]
张凌恩, 田佳英. 导丝在经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术治疗肝门部胆管癌中的应用技巧及护理配合[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(4): 179-181.
[13]
Ellis RJ, Soares KC, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(9): 2119.
[1] 李玉静, 陈七一, 谢汝明, 陈步东. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的预后研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-208.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[4] 赵国栋. 机器人肝内胆管细胞癌侵犯肝门部根治性切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 603-603.
[5] 吴周宇, 周宝勇, 李明. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 384-388.
[6] 孙翀, 徐成臣, 王辉, 谢应海, 王琦. 蛋白磷酸酶1G在肝细胞癌中的表达及其与预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 449-453.
[7] 孟泓宇, 卢逸, 曹彦龙, 戴操, 杨佳伟, 林楠, 徐见亮. 基于PSM比较TACE联合射频消融与单纯射频消融治疗小肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 417-421.
[8] 于小鹏, 陈晨, 陈家璐, 童焕军, 邱应和, 吴泓, 宋天强, 何宇, 毛先海, 翟文龙, 程张军, 李敬东, 耿智敏, 汤朝晖. 肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结清扫患者生存获益的术前临床病理特征[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 278-283.
[9] 单季军, 李相成. 肝门部胆管癌术前减黄及其对手术安全性的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 157-161.
[10] 房炯泽, 杨勇, 叶莹鹏, 朱宏达, 吴胜东, 陆才德. 肝门部胆管癌术后患者预后影响因素:单中心160例分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 619-624.
[11] 李健鹏, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 朱帝文, 鲍应军, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 曹耿飞, 任伟新. 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 294-298.
[12] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[13] 李衡, 吴清华, 刘昌贺, 袁艺文, 吕正颀. 可移动125I粒子条联合经皮肝胆管内外引流术治疗肝门部胆管癌的临床价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 48-54.
[14] 许晨, 俞靖凡, 方昌文, 张志轩, 徐国雄, 金一琦. 介入引流治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌的预后因素研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 376-381.
[15] 刘仕锦, 张怡然, 丁晖, 赵晓旭, 潘运龙. 代谢综合征与端粒状态对结直肠癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 231-235.
阅读次数
全文


摘要