切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 71 -75. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2024.01.014

综述

耻骨上切口疝手术治疗现状与进展
郭军(), 刘伟, 焦诚, 乔一鸣   
  1. 050081 石家庄,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八〇医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-31 出版日期:2024-02-01
  • 通信作者: 郭军

Current status and progress in the surgical treatment of suprapubic incisional hernia

Jun Guo(), Wei Liu, Cheng Jiao, Yiming Qiao   

  1. Department of General Surgery, the No. 980th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the People’s Liberation Army, Shijiazhuang 050081, China
  • Received:2023-03-31 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Guo
引用本文:

郭军, 刘伟, 焦诚, 乔一鸣. 耻骨上切口疝手术治疗现状与进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 71-75.

Jun Guo, Wei Liu, Cheng Jiao, Yiming Qiao. Current status and progress in the surgical treatment of suprapubic incisional hernia[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 71-75.

耻骨上切口疝(SIH)是腹壁疝的一种少见特殊类型,特指发生在中线距耻骨弓4 cm以内切口疝,疝环邻近骨骼、血管、神经和膀胱等结构;由于该部位腹直肌后鞘缺失,手术治疗极具挑战性,手术方式的选择一直存在争议。传统开放手术仍有广泛的应用基础,腹腔镜手术迅速发展,各种新颖的术式涌出,开放与腹腔镜联合不失是种灵活的选择。在腹壁重建的过程中,外科医师不仅需要充分了解腹壁复杂的解剖结构和空间解剖关系,还得具备在狭窄空间中缝合的能力。选择手术方式时应注重个体化方案,充分评估患者的一般情况,依据术者自身经验、技术的可行性、材料的经济性、可及性和患者的总体经济负担综合考虑。本文旨在探讨如何选择合适的耻骨上切口疝手术方式,主要涉及手术指征、手术方法、并发症预防和处理等方面。

Suprapubic incisional hernia (SIH) is a special type of abdominal wall incision hernia, which specifically refers to incision hernia that occurs within 4 cm from the midline to the pubic arch. The hernia ring is adjacent to the bone, blood vessels, nerves and bladder and other structures. Because the posterior sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle is missing, surgical treatment is very challenging, and the selection of appropriate surgical methods has been controversial. The purpose of this article is to discuss the selection of surgical options for SIH, including indications for surgery, surgical methods, and prevention and treatment of complications. Traditional open surgery is still widely used, and laparoscopic surgery has been rapidly developing, with a variety of novel surgical procedures emerging. The differences between the various surgical procedures lie in the different surgical accesses and the different levels of placement of the repair material; the combination of open and laparoscopic procedures is a flexible option. In the process of abdominal wall reconstruction, the surgeons not only need to fully understand the complex anatomical structure and spatial anatomical relationship of the abdominal wall, but also have the ability to suture in the narrow space. The choice of surgical procedures should be based on an individualized plan, thorough evaluation of the patients’ general condition, combination of experiences, technical feasibility, economic accessibility of materials, and the overall financial burden.

[1]
Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies[J]. Br J Surg, 2022, 109(12): 1239-1250.
[2]
Decker E, Currie A, Baig MK. Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 541-546.
[3]
戴晓冬. 41例腹腔镜开放杂交技术治疗腹壁切口疝经验总结[D]. 福州: 福建医科大学, 2018.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(7): 701-703.
[5]
Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 343(6): 392-398.
[6]
Demetrashvili Z, Pipia I, Loladze D, et al. Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 37: 65-70.
[7]
李健文, 乐飞, 薛佩. 从原发性腹壁疝的含义和特点谈微创术式进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1460-1468.
[8]
Li J. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(6): 774.
[9]
郑伟, 张超, 梁鸿, 等. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术治疗耻骨上切口疝的临床观察[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(6): 451-454.
[10]
Maemoto R, Tsujinaka S, Kakizawa N, et al. Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernia using a modified transabdominal partial extraperitoneal technique[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2022, 15(4): 872-876.
[11]
Bara T Jr, Gurzu S, Borz C, et al. Retromuscular mesh and hernial sac technique in the reconstruction of 139 cases of large median incisional hernias: one institution’s experience[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(1): 99-105.
[12]
乐飞, 李健文. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术存在的问题、争议与对策[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(2): 183-186.
[13]
Sharma A, Dey A, Khullar R, et al. Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(7): 2147-2152.
[14]
潘茂恩. 腹腔镜经腹部分腹膜前技术治疗下腹边缘疝临床分析[D]. 福州: 福建医科大学, 2019.
[15]
乐飞, 郝晓晖, 李健文. 腹腔镜修补治疗耻骨上疝的经验[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(4): 333-336.
[16]
Xu Q, Zhang G, Li L, et al. Non-closure of the free peritoneal flap during laparoscopic hernia repair of lower abdominal marginal hernia: A retrospective analysis[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 748515.
[17]
Mitura K. New techniques in ventral hernia surgery - an evolution of minimally-invasive hernia repairs[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2020, 92(4): 38-46.
[18]
赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(5): 554-557.
[19]
Griniatsos J, Yiannakopoulou E, Tsechpenakis A, et al. A hybrid technique for recurrent incisional hernia repair[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(5): e177-e180.
[20]
田广健, 刘鹏, 杨佩, 等. 开放手术辅助腹腔镜与完全腹腔镜下修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 481-484.
[21]
Kroese LF, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, et al. External validation of the European Hernia Society Classification for postoperative complications after incisional hernia repair: A cohort study of 2,191 patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2018, 226(3): 223-229.
[22]
李航宇. 从生物力学角度重新解读腹壁重建[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 379-383.
[23]
江志鹏, 周太成, 曾兵, 等. 一种切口疝缝合的创新技术——"立体"缝合[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(2): 160-163.
[24]
秦豪原, 胥博愈, 刘哲魁, 等. 腹壁切口疝修补术后慢性疼痛发生状况及危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(5): 350-353.
[25]
王学虎, 赵渝. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术及并发症处理[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(4): 302-305.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[6] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[7] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[8] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[9] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[13] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 邬秋俊, 向茜. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与2型糖尿病微血管并发症相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1109-1112.
阅读次数
全文


摘要