切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 85 -90. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2026.02.003

论著

新型预后营养炎症评分系统建立以有效预测胰腺癌根治术后患者的长期预后
曹喆1, 翁桂湖1, 刘涛1, 张锰钢1, 杨刚1, 陈浩1, 邱江东1, 徐建威2, 张太平1,()   
  1. 1 100730  北京,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 北京协和医院基本外科
    2 250012  济南,山东大学齐鲁医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-28 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张太平
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(2023YFC2413400); 协和人才培育支持计划D类项目(UHB11961); 中央高水平医院临床科研业务费项目(2025-PUMCH-A-070)

Development of a novel prognostic nutrition-inflammation scoring system to predict long-term prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer after radical surgery

Zhe Cao1, Guihu Weng1, Tao Liu1, Menggang Zhang1, Gang Yang1, Hao Chen1, Jiangdong Qiu1, Jianwei Xu2, Taiping Zhang1,()   

  1. 1 Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
    2 Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2026-02-28 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Taiping Zhang
引用本文:

曹喆, 翁桂湖, 刘涛, 张锰钢, 杨刚, 陈浩, 邱江东, 徐建威, 张太平. 新型预后营养炎症评分系统建立以有效预测胰腺癌根治术后患者的长期预后[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 85-90.

Zhe Cao, Guihu Weng, Tao Liu, Menggang Zhang, Gang Yang, Hao Chen, Jiangdong Qiu, Jianwei Xu, Taiping Zhang. Development of a novel prognostic nutrition-inflammation scoring system to predict long-term prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer after radical surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 85-90.

目的

探究营养及炎症相关指标在胰腺癌中的预后价值,并构建个性化预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年9月于北京协和医院和山东大学齐鲁医院接受胰腺癌根治性切除的158例胰腺癌患者的临床资料。采用Cox回归筛选与总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)相关的标志物。利用 “rms”包开发了预后营养炎症评分(PNIS)系统和PNIS-列线图,并通过时间依赖的受试者工作特征曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行评估。

结果

基于预后营养指数、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和超敏C反应蛋白构建PNIS公式,将患者分层为低、高风险组,高风险组的总生存期(P<0.001)和无病生存期 (P<0.001) 更短。结合病理分级、N 分期、化疗和吸烟史构建PNIS-列线图,其对1、2、3年OS率(AUC:0.896、0.782、0.783)和DFS率(AUC:0.775、0.766、0.784)的预测性能良好,且校准曲线和DCA表现优越。

结论

PNIS-列线图作为一种可靠工具,可有效预测胰腺癌手术患者的长期预后,可为异常炎性反应及营养不良在胰腺癌中的作用提供新见解。

Objective

Toinvestigate the prognostic values of nutrition-and inflammation-related indicators in pancreatic cancer and construct a personalized predictive model.

Methods

Clinical data from 158 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent radical resection in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2016 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression was used to identify markers associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic nutritional inflammation score (PNIS) system and PNIS-nomogram were developed using the ‘rms’ package and evaluated via time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The PNIS formula, based on prognostic nutritional index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, alanine aminotransferase, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups, with high-risk patients showing significantly shorter OS (P<0.001) and DFS (P<0.001). The PNIS-nomogram, incorporating pathological grade, N stage, chemotherapy, and smoking history, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS (AUC: 0.896, 0.782, 0.783) and DFS (AUC: 0.775, 0.766, 0.784), with favorable calibration and DCA results.

Conclusion

The PNIS-nomogram serves as a reliable tool for effectively predicting long-term postoperative outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients and may provide new insights into the role of abnormal inflammatory responses and malnutrition in pancreatic cancer.

图1 基于4个营养/炎症指标(PNI、NLR、ALT、hsCRP)的预后营养炎症评分(PNIS)列线图,用于预测胰腺癌患者的生存率或无病生存率 A. PNIS.OS模型用于1、2、3年OS率预测;B. PNIS.DFS模型用于1、2、3年DFS率预测;C. PNIS.OS低风险组与PNIS.OS高风险组患者的Kaplan-Meier曲线;D. PNIS.DFS低风险组与PNIS.DFS高风险组患者的Kaplan-Meier曲线;E. PNIS.OS模型的时间依赖性ROC曲线;F. PNIS.DFS模型的时间依赖性ROC曲线;总生存期(OS);无病生存期(DFS);外周血中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR);预后营养指数(PNI);丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT);超敏C反应白蛋白(hsCRP)
图2 结合PNIS评分和其他临床病理参数构建与评估PNIS-列线图,用于OS和DFS预测(A、B)、PNIS-列线图预测OS和DFS的时间依赖性ROC曲线(C、D);E. PNIS-列线图在预测患者1、2、3年OS率的校准曲线;F. PNIS-列线图在预测患者1、2、3年DFS率的校准曲线;总生存期(OS);无病生存期(DFS);预后营养炎症评分(PNIS);受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)
图3 PNIS-列线图与TNM分期在队列中1年OS率(A)、2年OS率(C)、3年OS率(E)及1年DFS率(B)、2年DFS率(D)、3年DFS率(F)中的决策曲线分析;总生存期(OS);无病生存期(DFS);预后营养炎症评分(PNIS)
[1]
Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2026[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2026, 76(1): e70043.
[2]
Zeng H, Zheng R, Sun K, et al. Cancer survival statistics in China 2019–2021: A multicenter, population-based study[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4(3): 203-213.
[3]
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-63.
[4]
Xu Z, Chen J, Mou Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status on short-term prognosis after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 29549.
[5]
Yu M, Li X, Chen M, et al. Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: A systematic review[J]. Nutr J, 2024, 23(1): 17.
[6]
Yarmolinsky J, Robinson J W, Mariosa D, et al. Association between circulating inflammatory markers and adult cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. EBioMedicine, 2024, 100: 104991.
[7]
Tan S, Zheng Q, Zhang W, et al. Prognostic value of inflammatory markers NLR, PLR, and LMR in gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Front Immunol, 2024, 15: 1408700.
[8]
Ma Q, Hao S, Hong W, et al. Versatile function of NF-ĸB in inflammation and cancer[J]. Exp Hematol Oncol, 2024, 13(1): 68.
[9]
Liu Y, Li K. Predictive role of the prognostic nutritional index for long-term prognosis among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2025, 25(1): 51.
[10]
Okadome K, Baba Y, Yagi T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(4): 693-700.
[11]
Huang JC, Pan B, Jiang T, et al. Effect of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index on the long-term prognosis in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1098459.
[12]
Worapongpaiboon R, Siranart N, Pajareya P, et al. Inflammatory markers in predicting survival in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Pancreatology, 2025, 25(3): 385-395.
[13]
Deng M, Qing Y, Qiu D, et al. The prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2025, 15: 1536920.
[14]
Ortiz López D, Marchena Gómez J, Nogués Ramia EM, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at diagnosis in colorectal cancer: propensity score analysis[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 2024, 116(8): 408-415.
[15]
Mowbray NG, Griffith D, Hammoda M, et al. A meta-analysis of the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting survival after pancreatic cancer resection[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(5): 379-384.
[16]
Albhaisi S, Qayyum R. The association between serum liver enzymes and cancer mortality[J]. Clin Exp Med, 2022, 22(1): 75-81.
[17]
Chen SL, Li JP, Li LF, et al. Elevated preoperative serum alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ratio is associated with better prognosis in patients undergoing curative treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17(6): 911.
[18]
Kimchy AV, Singh H, Parikh E, et al. The predictive value of liver tests for the presence of liver metastases[J]. Hepat Oncol, 2023, 10(3): Hep48.
[19]
Dong S, Wang L, Guo YB, et al. Risk factors of liver metastasis from advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A large multicenter cohort study[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1): 120.
[20]
Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, et al. An inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: A Glasgow inflammation outcome study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2011, 104(4): 726-734.
[21]
Wijma AG, Hogenbirk RNM, Driessens H, et al. Nutritional support in pancreatic cancer patients and its effect on nutritional status: An observational regional HPB network study investigating current practice[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2024, 32(7): 487.
[22]
Biesel EA, Riesterer D, Weckler M, et al. InPaFis-results of an open monocenter single-arm phase Ⅱ study to evaluate the safety of a modified analgesia with indomethacin during pancreatectomy and its influence on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(11): 7987-8000.
[1] 王禹翰, 王博娟, 徐景竹, 张涛, 王兴华. 临床参数和二维超声特征联合超声显微造影征象构建的列线图模型预测HER-2阳性乳腺癌的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(12): 1130-1139.
[2] 青莹莹, 尚子涵, 孙志慧, 孙璐璐, 董刚, 张雨昂, 岳文文, 张姗姗. 超声引导下同轴针辅助与直接活检枪在胰腺占位性病变穿刺活检中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(12): 1156-1162.
[3] 徐世伟, 廖杜荣, 张镐, 叶辉, 陈志平, 雒洪志. 基于一种新炎症-营养指标构建结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 383-389.
[4] 严一杰, 张军, 孟繁杰, 关志宇. 肺结节-胸膜关系预测CT引导下肺穿刺活检后气胸风险的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 36-41.
[5] 杜东莲, 史志伟, 姚洁, 张树敏, 代卫斌. 基于CT影像组学和临床特征预测单发肺结节生长的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 56-61.
[6] 邢颖, 王峰. 基于机器学习构建肝切除术后肝衰竭预测列线图模型及其预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 190-196.
[7] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[8] 孙娟华, 白引苗, 孔胜男, 王梦雪, 王文慧, 张红梅. 胰腺癌患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐风险列线图构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 114-119.
[9] 张维娜, 潘亚娟, 徐敏. 晚期消化系统癌症手术患者器官/腔隙感染的风险预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 120-124.
[10] 慈娟娟, 吴俊成, 朱琴琴. 肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者内镜治疗后再出血风险列线图的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 47-52.
[11] 刘燕, 马亦旻. 消化道早癌患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后局部复发预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 576-582.
[12] 赵莉, 张敏伟, 郭浩东, 于海侠, 王光明, 李德春. 乳腺X线模型构建列线图预测乳腺癌HR及HER2的表达[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(10): 747-757.
[13] 王超, 张晓会, 李晓帆, 赵海丹. 维持性血液透析患者感染与心脑血管死亡风险的比较及联合预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 675-681.
[14] 于少华, 苏飞, 芦永斌, 袁芳芸, 阚晓燕, 张涛, 侯小明. 基于血清电解质水平构建列线图模型对广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(08): 574-581.
[15] 皇立媛, 浦洁, 王苏贵, 陈婷婷, 朱德慧, 胡雪. 中青年脑卒中患者应激障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 504-512.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?