切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 208 -211. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2010.03.006

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

血管内皮生长因子C联合多排螺旋CT诊断结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移的临床评价
王天宝1,(), 王劲2, 唐录英3, 魏波4, 董文广1   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第一医院东山院区外科
    2. 中山大学附属第三医院放射科
    3. 中山大学附属第三医院病理科
    4. 中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-09 出版日期:2010-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王天宝

Analysis of methods for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer

Tian-bao WANG1,(), Jin WANG2, Lu-ying TANG3, Bo WEI4, Wen-guang DONG1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2009-03-09 Published:2010-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Tian-bao WANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: WANG Tian-bao, Email:
引用本文:

王天宝, 王劲, 唐录英, 魏波, 董文广. 血管内皮生长因子C联合多排螺旋CT诊断结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移的临床评价[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2010, 04(03): 208-211.

Tian-bao WANG, Jin WANG, Lu-ying TANG, Bo WEI, Wen-guang DONG. Analysis of methods for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2010, 04(03): 208-211.

目的

探讨术前血清血管内皮生长因子C(sVEGF-C)水平联合多排螺旋CT(MDCT)扫描能否作为判断结直肠癌淋巴结转移的理想方法。

方法

ELISA方法测定110例结直肠癌患者(结直肠癌组)及40例健康者(对照组)的sVEGF-C浓度,MDCT平扫及三期强化动态扫描判断淋巴结有无转移。

结果

结直肠癌组sVEGF-C浓度为(889.2±264.0)μg/L,对照组为(373.2±97.3)μg/L(P=0.000);病理诊断伴有淋巴结转移的70例结直肠癌患者sVEGF-C明显升高[(996.2±247.1)μg/L vs(701.6±173.6)μg/L,P=0.000];取临界点为996.2 μg/L时,sVEGF-C诊断淋巴结转移的敏感度为57.1%,特异度为85.0%,准确度为67.3%,阳性预测值为87.0%,阴性预测值为53.0%。MDCT诊断淋巴结转移的敏感度为51.4%,特异度为70.0%,准确度为58.2%,阳性预测值为75.0%,阴性预测值为45.2%。sVEGF-C联合MDCT诊断淋巴结转移的敏感度为75.7%,特异度为92.5%,准确度81.8%,阳性预测值94.6%,阴性预测值68.5%。

结论

单独应用sVEGF-C或MDCT判断结直肠癌淋巴结转移效果均不理想,两者联合应用可进一步提高准确度,可作为术前判断淋巴结转移的有用指标。

Objective

To investigate whether serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C(sVEGF-C) and multidetector CT(MDCT) have relationships with lymph node metastasis(LNM) in colorectal cancer.

Methods

The sVEGF-C level of 110 patients and 40 donors were examined by ELISA.Both plain and enhanced MDCT scan of abdomen were performed.Detailed pathologic findings were recorded.

Results

The level of sVEGF-C was higher in colorectal cancer group than in control group [(889.2±264.0)μg/L vs (373.2±97.3)μg/L]. As a cutoff value being 996.2μg/L, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sVEGF-C for predicating LNM were 57.1%, 85.0%, 67.3%, 87.0%, 53.0%, respectively. MDCT were used to detect the LNM, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive, negative predictive value were 51.4%, 70.0%, 58.2%, 75.0%, 45.2%, respectively. When sVEGF-C associated with spiral CT were employed to diagnosis the LNM in colorectal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 75.7%, 92.5%, 81.8%, 94.6%, 68.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

sVEGF-C associated with MDCT can be used as a preoperative methode for diagnosis of LNM in colorectal cancer.

图1 直肠癌淋巴结转移(箭头所示)
表1 sVEGF-C、MDCT及两者联合诊断结直肠癌淋巴结转移评价
1
吕其安,康希保,崔文,等.结直肠癌组织VEGF-C、Flt-4及Survivin与淋巴管生成及淋巴结转移关系的研究[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2008, 2(4):267-270.
2
Yu XM, Lo CY, Lam AK, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor C correlates with lymph node metastases and high-risk tumor profiles in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(3):483-489.
3
Tamura M, Oda M, Tsunezuka Y, et al. Chest CT and serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C level to diagnose lymph node metastasis in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer. Chest, 2004, 126(2):342-346.
4
赵志清,郑可国,沈静娴,等.螺旋CT对胃癌淋巴结转移的评价.世界华人消化杂志, 2006, 14(31):3060-3064.
5
Tamura M, Ohta Y. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C level in patients with primary nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer, 2003, 98(6):1217-1222.
6
Mathur SP, Mathur RS, Gray EA, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C(VEGF-C) as a specific biomarker for advanced cerv-ical cancer: Relationship to insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), IGF binding protein 3(IGF-BP3) and VEGF-A. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 98(3):467-483.
7
乔英,李健丁,张瑞平,等. CT三期增强扫描对胃癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值.放射学实践, 2006, 21(5):507-510.
8
严超,朱正纲,燕敏,等.早期胃癌淋巴结转移的危险因素及MOCT评估.世界华人消化杂志, 2008, 16(9):951-955.
[1] 彭国兵, 费建平. 影响患者永久性结肠造口的状况及因素[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 264-268.
[2] 蒙姣姣, 胡刚, 欧阳涣堃. 肺癌术前淋巴结转移及MWA手术效果预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 547-549.
[3] 葛卫卫, 李伟, 李荣兴, 成亚会, 李青松. MSCT与HRCT在不同病理类型肺磨玻璃结节中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 572-574.
[4] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
[5] 鄂一民, 孙司正, 范小彧, 喻春钊. 结直肠癌粪便筛查的现状与展望[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 331-336.
[6] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[7] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[8] 刘代江, 蒋俊艳, 万晓强, 马莎英. 结直肠癌肝转移患者生存状况及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 284-288.
[9] 王健, 赵海剑, 孙静, 张晓雨, 陈柏羽. LncRNA SNHG4表达与结直肠癌预后的关系[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 139-144.
[10] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[11] 王飞飞, 王光林, 孟泽松, 李保坤, 曹龙飞, 张娟, 周超熙, 丁源一, 王贵英. 敲低IMPDH1对结肠癌SW480、HT29细胞生物功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 884-890.
[12] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
[13] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
[14] 王延召, 牛鹏飞, 丁长民, 高庆坤, 高兆亚, 安柯, 翟志超, 曾庆敏, 黄文生, 雷福明, 顾晋. 结直肠癌致腹壁巨大缺损的一期修补经验(附13例报告)[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 557-561.
[15] 邓文珺, 李长政. 结肠镜检查前肠道清洁剂使用的研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 192-194.
阅读次数
全文


摘要