切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 457 -464. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2011.06.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

混合性肝癌的临床病理学特点及手术疗效分析
林佳锐1, 郭荣平1,(), 韦玮1, 郭智兴1   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-06 出版日期:2011-12-01
  • 通信作者: 郭荣平

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Jia-rui LIN1, Rong-ping GUO1,(), Wei WEI1, Zhi-xing GUO1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, 510080 Guangzhou, China
  • Received:2011-05-06 Published:2011-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Rong-ping GUO
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: GUO Rong-ping, Email:
引用本文:

林佳锐, 郭荣平, 韦玮, 郭智兴. 混合性肝癌的临床病理学特点及手术疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 05(06): 457-464.

Jia-rui LIN, Rong-ping GUO, Wei WEI, Zhi-xing GUO. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2011, 05(06): 457-464.

目的

探讨混合性肝癌(cHCC-CC)的临床病理学特点及影响手术疗效的相关因素。

方法

收集1992年1月至2010年6月经手术及病理确诊的混合性肝癌患者临床资料48例,其中40例随访资料完整者被纳入研究。回顾性分析其临床病理特点和预后影响因素。

结果

40例cHCC-CC肿瘤合并卫星灶者10例(25%),血管侵犯6例(15%),淋巴结转移5例(12.5%),周围器官侵犯10例(25%)。10例(25%)病理学检查见低分化癌细胞,HEP/AFP及CK染色均阳性。术后总中位生存期12.5个月,1年、3年、5年生存率分别为60.9%、39.1%、29.9%。29例(72.5%)术后出现复发、转移,其中23例(79.3%)发生在术后1年内。多因素分析结果提示低分化cHCC-CC及血管侵犯是影响手术疗效的独立因子。

结论

混合性肝癌手术疗效差,低分化cHCC-CC及合并血管侵犯是预后不良的独立影响因子。

Objective

To explore the clinicopathologic characteristics of cHCC-CC and found out factors related to survival postoperation.

Methods

Forty-eight patients received surgery and were diagnosed with cHCC-CC pathologically from January 1992 to June 2010 in Cancer center of Sun Yat-sen University. Forty integral records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Tumor with multinodulars, vascular invasion, regional lymph nodes spreading or direct invasion of adjacent organs were present in 25%, 15%, 12.5%, 25% of cases respectively. Ten patients were found both HEP/AFP and CK18/19 positive and the prognosis was the worst. The overall survival rate at 1-, 3-, 5- years were 60.9%, 39.1% and 29.9% respectively. Recurrence were detected in 29 patients(72.5%) and most of them (79.3%) occur within the first year. Univariate analysis showed that poorly differentiated and positive of the vessel invasion were predictions of low overall survival (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma have poor postoperative survival rates. Poorly differentiated and positive of the vessel invasion wre associated with poorer survival.

表1 混合性肝癌患者临床病理学特征[例(%)]
图1 混合性肝癌混合生长型组织病理学改变(HE染色,×100)
图2 混合性肝癌移行生长型组织病理学改变(HE染色,×100)
图3 低分化混合性肝癌组织病理学改变(HE染色,×100)
图4 低分化混合性肝癌AFP呈阳性表达(免疫组化染色,×200)
图5 低分化混合性肝癌CK呈阳性表达(免疫组化染色,×200)
图6 低分化混合性肝癌与非低分化混合性肝癌患者术后总体生存率
图7 混合性肝癌患者术后总体生存率
图8 混合性肝癌患者术后无瘤生存率
表2 影响预后相关因素的多因素分析
1
Goodman ZD, Ishak KG, Langloss JM, et al. Combined hepato-cellular-cholangiocarcinoma: A histologic and immunohistoche-mical study. Cancer, 1985,55(1):124-135.
2
Koh KC, Lee H, Choi MS, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg, 2005,189(1):120-125.
3
Allen RA, Lisa JR. Combined liver cell and bile duct carcinoma. Am J Pathol, 1949,25(4):647-655.
4
Maeda T, Adachi E, Kajiyama K, et al. Combined hepatoce-llular and cholangiocarcinoma: proposed criteria according to cytokeratin expression and analysis of clinicopathologic features. Hum Pathol, 1995,26(9):956-964.
5
Imai Y, Oda H, Arai M, et al. Mutational analysis of the p53 and K-ras genes and allelotype study of the Rb-1 gene for investigating the pathogenesis of combined hapatocellular-cholangiocellular carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res, 1996,87(10):1056-1062.
6
张峰, 陈孝平, 张伟, 等. 混合型肝癌的肝脏祖细胞起源研究.中华普通外科杂志, 2007,22(11):836-839.
7
Nishie A, Yoshimitsu K, Asayama Y, et al. Detection of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinomas on enhanced CT: comparison with histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(4):1157-1162.
8
Nakamura S, Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangio- carcinoma. Cancer, 1996,78(8):1671-1676.
9
Kim KH, Lee SG, Park EH, et al. Surgical treatments and prognoses of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009,16(3):623-629.
10
徐立斌, 赵东兵, 邵永孚, 等. 混合细胞性肝癌14例的诊断及外科治疗效果分析.中华普通外科杂志, 2003,18(2): 418-421.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[11] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要