切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 386 -389. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.05.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下胆管切开取石一期胆管缝合应用于高龄患者的安全性探讨
张红卫1,(), 陈亚进1, 李闻达1, 黄泽坚1   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-01 出版日期:2014-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张红卫

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledoch-olithiasis in elder patients

Hongwei Zhang1,(), Yajin Chen1, Wenda Li1, Zejian Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2013-06-01 Published:2014-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hongwei, Email:
引用本文:

张红卫, 陈亚进, 李闻达, 黄泽坚. 腹腔镜下胆管切开取石一期胆管缝合应用于高龄患者的安全性探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 08(05): 386-389.

Hongwei Zhang, Yajin Chen, Wenda Li, Zejian Huang. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledoch-olithiasis in elder patients[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 08(05): 386-389.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后一期缝合胆管而不放置胆管引流在高龄患者中的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2007年1月至2012年10月接受腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后不放置胆管引流的高龄病例临床资料,共16例作为研究组,收集同时期接受腹腔镜下胆管切开取石不放置胆管引流管的非高龄病例20例作为对照组。对比分析两组患者的平均手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症情况等。

结果

两组患者术后均康复出院。研究组平均手术时间为(116.31±11.31)min,平均住院时间(10.19±1.22)d;而对照组平均手术时间为(106.80±10.58)min,平均住院时间(7.65±0.88)d;两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组均无胆漏、腹腔出血、膈下感染及术后阻塞性黄疸等术后并发症。两组的切口感染、肺部感染率和结石复发率差异无统计学意义。

结论

腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后一期缝合胆管而不放置胆管引流用于高龄患者是安全、可行的。

Objective

To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis in elder patients.

Methods

The clinical data of sixteen elder patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent primary closure of the common bile duct (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE (group A) was compared with 20 non-elder patients who underwent the same procedure (group B). Both groups were evaluated with regard to operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Results

The mean operation time was (116.31±11.31) minutes for group A and (106.80±10.58) minutes for group B; the hospital stay was (10.19±1.22) days for group A and (7.65±0.88) days for group B; both factors showed no significant difference. There were no bile leakage, abdominal bleeding, subphrenic infection and obstructive jaundice after operation in both groups. And there was no significant difference in incision infection, pulmonary infection and recurrence of stones in both groups.

Conculsion

It is safe and feasible for elder patients to have primary closure of the common bile duct without T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

表1 两组患者的一般资料
表2 两组患者术中情况和随访资料的比较
[1]
Yin Z,Xu K,Sun J, et al. Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 57(1):54-66.
[2]
陈剑,缪刚,李尧, 等. 胆总管汇合部微切开探查取石术的优越性[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2013, 7(2): 114-117.
[3]
Zhang WJ,Xu GF,Wu GZ, et al. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Surg Res, 2009,157(1): e1-e5.
[4]
Leida Z,Ping B,Shuguang W, et al. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(7): 1595-1600.
[5]
Cai H,Sun D,Sun Y, et al. Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(1): 164-170.
[6]
Shively EH,Richardson M,Romines R, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in 90-bed rural hospital[J]. Am Surg, 2010, 76(6): 626-629.
[7]
Alhamdani A,Mahmud S,Jameel M, et al. Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(10): 2190-2195.
[8]
Zhang HW,Chen YJ,Wu CH, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage[J]. Am Surg,2014, 80(2): 178-181.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[15] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
阅读次数
全文


摘要