切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 402 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.05.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

腔镜深筋膜下交通静脉离断联合小腿曲张静脉直视透光旋切术治疗活动性下肢静脉溃疡的早期疗效研究
龙淼云1, 黄楷1, 黄明清1, 罗定远1, 彭新治1, 林少建1, 黎洪浩1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-24 出版日期:2014-10-01
  • 通信作者: 黎洪浩

Early stage effect comparison of lower limb venous ulcer (C6) treatment by combination of SEPS and Trivex system to SEPS

Miaoyun Long1, Kai Huang1, Mingqing Huang1, Dingyuan Luo1, Xinzhi Peng1, Shaojian Lin1, Honghao Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2013-09-24 Published:2014-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Honghao Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Honghao, Email:
引用本文:

龙淼云, 黄楷, 黄明清, 罗定远, 彭新治, 林少建, 黎洪浩. 腔镜深筋膜下交通静脉离断联合小腿曲张静脉直视透光旋切术治疗活动性下肢静脉溃疡的早期疗效研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 08(05): 402-405.

Miaoyun Long, Kai Huang, Mingqing Huang, Dingyuan Luo, Xinzhi Peng, Shaojian Lin, Honghao Li. Early stage effect comparison of lower limb venous ulcer (C6) treatment by combination of SEPS and Trivex system to SEPS[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 08(05): 402-405.

目的

比较单纯腔镜深筋膜下交通静脉离断术(SEPS)与SEPS联合小腿曲张静脉直视透光旋切术(Trivex术)治疗活动性下肢静脉溃疡的早期效果。

方法

选择2009年1月至2012年12月入院的下肢静脉溃疡患者156例,按住院号单、双将患者分为试验组(SEPS+Trivex术)和对照组(SEPS术)。比较两组患者术后第1、3、6个月溃疡愈合、复发、下肢肿痛及局部皮肤麻木等并发症的发生率。

结果

术后1个月两组患者的溃疡愈合率差异无统计学意义,试验组术区肿痛及麻木感均显著高于对照组(26.3% vs 11.2%,23.8% vs 10.1%,P<0.05),无患者溃疡复发;术后3个月试验组患者的溃疡愈合率高于对照组(80.0% vs 66.3%,P<0.05),术区肿痛稍低于对照组(5.0% vs 5.6%),差异无统计学意义,麻木高于对照组(12.5% vs 3.4%,P<0.05);术后6个月试验组患者的溃疡愈合率高于对照组(91.3% vs 79.8%,P<0.05),试验组及对照组术后6个月术区肿痛发生率分别为3.8%及2.4%,差异无统计学意义,术区麻木消失。术后第6个月试验组静脉溃疡复发率低于对照组(1.25% vs 7.87%,P<0.05)。两组患者术中及随访期间均未出现死亡病例,未发生深静脉血栓形成等严重并发症。

结论

虽然SEPS+Trivex术后短期(1~3个月)轻微并发症的发生率较高,但在术后早期(6个月内)静脉溃疡治愈率更高,复发率更低,因此更适合下肢静脉溃疡的治疗。

Objective

To compare the early stage treatment effect of lower limb venous ulcer (C6)by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) to SEPS and Trivex system.

Methods

According to singular or even hospital number, one hundred and fifty-six patients of venous ulcer in lower limb adopted from January 2009 to December 2012 were divided into two groups. Experimental group: singular hospital number, treated by combination of SEPS and Trivex system, saphenous vein ligation and stripping, percutaneous and continuous venule circumsuture at the same time; control group: even hospital number, treated by SEPS, and saphenous vein ligation and stripping, percutaneous and continuous venule circumsuture.

Results

In the first month, the healing rate in two groups had no statistically significant differences; pain and numbness in experimental group was much higher than control group (26.3% vs 11.2%, 23.8% vs 10.1%, P<0.05). There was no ulcer recurrence in the two groups. In the third month, the healing rate in experimental group was much higher than control group (80.0% vs 66.3%, P<0.05) , and numbness in experimental group was much higher than control group (12.5% vs 3.4%, P<0.05). In the sixth month, the healing rate in experimental group was higher than control group (91.3% vs 79.8%, P<0.05) . No patient felt pain and numbness. The recurrent rate of ulcer in experimental group was lower than control group (1.25% vs 7.87%, P<0.05). All patients in the two groups had no serious complications, but subcutaneous hematoma and skin numbness after operation was much higher than control group in the first month (P<0.05), and became the same in the sixth month.

Conculsion

Though the slight complications of experimental group such as subcutaneous hematoma and skin numbness after operation are much higher than SEPS group in the first to third month, combination of Trivex system with SEPS is a better way to treat venous ulcerv (C6) in lower limb for a higher healing rate and a lower recurrence rate.

表1 两组患者的一般资料
表2 两组患者术后1~6月随访结果(例/%,χ2检验)
[1]
Taylor RR,Sladkevicius E,Guest JF. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of electric stimulation therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care,2011,20(10): 468-472.
[2]
Labropoulos N,Wang ED,Lanier ST, et al. Factors associated with poor healing and recurrence of venous ulceration[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,129(1): 179-186.
[3]
Kurdal AT,Cerrahoglu M,Iskesen I, et al. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery ameliorates the symptoms of chronic venous ulcer(C6)patients[J]. Int Angiol,2010,29(1): 70-74.
[4]
Cheshire N,Elias SM,Keagy B, et al. Powered phlebectomy (TriVex)in treatment of varicose veins[J]. Ann Vasc Surg,2002,16(4): 488-494.
[5]
Harlander-Locke M,Jimenez JC,Lawrence PF, et al. Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebectomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries[J]. J Vasc Surg,2013,58(1): 166-172.
[6]
Wong IK,Andriessen A,Lee DT, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers[J]. J Eur Aca Dermatol Venereol,2012,26(1): 102-110.
[7]
Harlander-Locke M,Lawrence PF,Alktaifi A, et al. The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates[J]. J Vasc Surg,2012,55(2): 458-464.
[8]
van Gent WB,Hop WC,van Praag MC, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective,randomized,multicenter trial[J]. J Vasc Surg,2006,44(3): 563-571.
[9]
Baffoni M,Bessa LJ,Grande R, et al. Laser irradiation effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms isolated from venous leg ulcer[J]. Int Wound J,2012,9(5): 517-524.
[10]
常光其,殷恒讳,李晓曦, 等. 复发性静脉性溃疡的原因分析及再处理方法[J]. 中华外科杂志,2011,49(6): 155-158.
[1] 龙淼云, 罗定远, 彭新治, 黄楷, 黄明清, 林少建, 黎洪浩. 冷光源引导下泡沫硬化剂注射小腿曲张浅静脉在下肢静脉溃疡治疗中的应用探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2015, 09(01): 22-25.
阅读次数
全文


摘要