切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 487 -490. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2015.06.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的研究
刁向锋1,(), 范杨轶1, 陈博飞1   
  1. 1. 510000 广州市白云区第一人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-15 出版日期:2015-12-01
  • 通信作者: 刁向锋

Clinical study of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy

Xiangfeng Diao1,(), Yangyi Fan1, Bofei Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Baiyun District Guangzhou, Guangzhou 51000, China
  • Received:2015-03-15 Published:2015-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangfeng Diao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Diao Xiangfeng, Email:
引用本文:

刁向锋, 范杨轶, 陈博飞. 经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2015, 09(06): 487-490.

Xiangfeng Diao, Yangyi Fan, Bofei Chen. Clinical study of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(06): 487-490.

目的

探讨完全经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除手术的可行性及美容效果。

方法

958例急性阑尾炎患者随机分为完全经脐部三孔法腹腔镜组(研究组)479例和传统非全部经脐部三孔法腹腔镜组(对照组)479例。比较两组手术的临床指标及术后随访情况,并采用患者问卷方法评价美容效果。

结果

两组手术均顺利完成。研究组和对照组手术时间分别为(48±2.2)min和(30±1.6)min(t=144.819,P<0.01),差异有统计学意义,而术中出血量分别为(15±2.9)ml及(15±2.2)ml,下床活动时间分别为(26±3.1)h及(26±2.1)h,术后肛门排气时间分别为(29±2.1)h及(29±1.6)h,住院时间分别为(3±0.5)d及(3±0.3)d,综合费用分别为(6 589±42)元及(6 591±41)元,差异均无统计学意义。随访时间为1.7~4.8年,两组均无切口感染;止痛药使用频率分别为16.7%(80/479)和17.7%(85/479),差异无统计学意义;患者美容满意度为优的比例分别占99.8%(478/479)和9.8%(47/479),差异有统计学意义(χ2=782.84,P<0.01)。

结论

经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有安全可行、腹部美容效果佳等优点,可作为急性阑尾炎的有效治疗方式之一。

Objective

To explore the feasibility and cosmetic effect of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods

A total of 958 appendicitis patients were randomly divided into group A (study group) and group B (control group). In group A, 479 patients were treated with total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy. In group B, the other 479 patients were treated with traditional non-transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy. The clinic effect and the followed-up result were compared. The cosmetic results were scored by the patients.

Results

The operation was successfully performed in all 958 patients. The operating time in group A and B was (48±2.2) min vs (30±1.6) min (t=144.819, P<0.01), the blood loss was (15±2.9) ml vs (15±2.2) ml, the off bed time was (26±3.1) h vs (26±2.1) h, the anus exhausting time was (29±2.1) h vs (29±1.6) h, the hospital stay was (3±0.5) d vs (3±0.3) d, the cost of the operation was (6 589±42) yuan vs (6 591±41) yuan, and the rate of analgesics using was 16.7% vs 17.7%. All the patients were followed-up for 1.7 to 4.8 years (average 2.9 years). There was no incision infection between two groups. The cosmetic satisfaction rate in group A and B were 99.8% vs 9.8% (χ2=782.84, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy is safe with good cosmetic result. It is effective for the patients with acute appendicitis.

表1 两组急性阑尾炎患者的基本资料
图1 各Trocar位置
图2 荷包缝合残端后
图3 经脐部三孔的伤口情况
图4 传统三孔的伤口情况
表2 两组患者手术情况和住院情况比较( ± st检验)
表3 两组患者术后3个月时美观评价比较(例,x2检验)
1
Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Novel approach of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as a solo surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 21: 1-7.
2
陈开运, 王存川. 腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗阑尾炎的对比研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学,2008.
3
Marcscaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being[J]. Arch Surg, 2007, 12(6): 823-826.
4
Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(4): 583- 602.
5
Raakow J, Liesaus HG, Neuhaus P, et al. Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(6): 1530-1536.
6
Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppäniemi A. Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(2): 237-242.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[13] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[14] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[15] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
阅读次数
全文


摘要