切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 487 -490. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2015.06.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的研究
刁向锋1,(), 范杨轶1, 陈博飞1   
  1. 1. 510000 广州市白云区第一人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-15 出版日期:2015-12-01
  • 通信作者: 刁向锋

Clinical study of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy

Xiangfeng Diao1,(), Yangyi Fan1, Bofei Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Baiyun District Guangzhou, Guangzhou 51000, China
  • Received:2015-03-15 Published:2015-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangfeng Diao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Diao Xiangfeng, Email:
引用本文:

刁向锋, 范杨轶, 陈博飞. 经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2015, 09(06): 487-490.

Xiangfeng Diao, Yangyi Fan, Bofei Chen. Clinical study of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(06): 487-490.

目的

探讨完全经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除手术的可行性及美容效果。

方法

958例急性阑尾炎患者随机分为完全经脐部三孔法腹腔镜组(研究组)479例和传统非全部经脐部三孔法腹腔镜组(对照组)479例。比较两组手术的临床指标及术后随访情况,并采用患者问卷方法评价美容效果。

结果

两组手术均顺利完成。研究组和对照组手术时间分别为(48±2.2)min和(30±1.6)min(t=144.819,P<0.01),差异有统计学意义,而术中出血量分别为(15±2.9)ml及(15±2.2)ml,下床活动时间分别为(26±3.1)h及(26±2.1)h,术后肛门排气时间分别为(29±2.1)h及(29±1.6)h,住院时间分别为(3±0.5)d及(3±0.3)d,综合费用分别为(6 589±42)元及(6 591±41)元,差异均无统计学意义。随访时间为1.7~4.8年,两组均无切口感染;止痛药使用频率分别为16.7%(80/479)和17.7%(85/479),差异无统计学意义;患者美容满意度为优的比例分别占99.8%(478/479)和9.8%(47/479),差异有统计学意义(χ2=782.84,P<0.01)。

结论

经脐部三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有安全可行、腹部美容效果佳等优点,可作为急性阑尾炎的有效治疗方式之一。

Objective

To explore the feasibility and cosmetic effect of total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods

A total of 958 appendicitis patients were randomly divided into group A (study group) and group B (control group). In group A, 479 patients were treated with total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy. In group B, the other 479 patients were treated with traditional non-transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy. The clinic effect and the followed-up result were compared. The cosmetic results were scored by the patients.

Results

The operation was successfully performed in all 958 patients. The operating time in group A and B was (48±2.2) min vs (30±1.6) min (t=144.819, P<0.01), the blood loss was (15±2.9) ml vs (15±2.2) ml, the off bed time was (26±3.1) h vs (26±2.1) h, the anus exhausting time was (29±2.1) h vs (29±1.6) h, the hospital stay was (3±0.5) d vs (3±0.3) d, the cost of the operation was (6 589±42) yuan vs (6 591±41) yuan, and the rate of analgesics using was 16.7% vs 17.7%. All the patients were followed-up for 1.7 to 4.8 years (average 2.9 years). There was no incision infection between two groups. The cosmetic satisfaction rate in group A and B were 99.8% vs 9.8% (χ2=782.84, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Total transumbilical tract laparoscopic appendectomy is safe with good cosmetic result. It is effective for the patients with acute appendicitis.

表1 两组急性阑尾炎患者的基本资料
图1 各Trocar位置
图2 荷包缝合残端后
图3 经脐部三孔的伤口情况
图4 传统三孔的伤口情况
表2 两组患者手术情况和住院情况比较( ± st检验)
表3 两组患者术后3个月时美观评价比较(例,x2检验)
1
Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Novel approach of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as a solo surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 21: 1-7.
2
陈开运, 王存川. 腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗阑尾炎的对比研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学,2008.
3
Marcscaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being[J]. Arch Surg, 2007, 12(6): 823-826.
4
Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(4): 583- 602.
5
Raakow J, Liesaus HG, Neuhaus P, et al. Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(6): 1530-1536.
6
Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppäniemi A. Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(2): 237-242.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要