切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 251 -255. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.04.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

射频消融联合小剂量卡培他滨化疗治疗老年大肠癌术后肝转移的临床疗效分析
于广计1, 刘松1, 王庆东1,()   
  1. 1. 276000 山东省临沂市肿瘤医院介入治疗科
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-18 出版日期:2016-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王庆东

Clinical effect of radiofrequency ablation in combination with small doses of capecitabine regimen for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases

Guangji Yu1, Song Liu1, Qingdong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiotherapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi 276000, China
  • Received:2016-04-18 Published:2016-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingdong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Qingdong, Email:
引用本文:

于广计, 刘松, 王庆东. 射频消融联合小剂量卡培他滨化疗治疗老年大肠癌术后肝转移的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(04): 251-255.

Guangji Yu, Song Liu, Qingdong Wang. Clinical effect of radiofrequency ablation in combination with small doses of capecitabine regimen for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(04): 251-255.

目的

探讨射频消融术(RFA)联合小剂量卡培他滨治疗老年大肠癌术后肝转移的疗效及安全性。

方法

选择2010年1月至2015年7月收治的46例老年确诊为大肠癌术后肝转移患者,其中25例接受射频消融术联合卡培他滨治疗(联合治疗组),21例仅接受单药卡培他滨化疗(单纯化疗组),每日给药剂量为1 500 mg/m2,分2次口服,连用2周,3周为一周期。分别按照实体瘤的疗效评价标准(RECIST1.1)和三期增强CT评价化疗和RFA近期疗效,随访患者的远期生存情况并记录RFA并发症及化疗不良反应。

结果

联合治疗组获得完全缓解(CR)13例,部分缓解(PR)5例,稳定(SD)4例,进展(PD)3例,有效率(RR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为72.0%和88.0%;单纯化疗组获得CR 0例,PR 6例,SD 7例,PD 8例,RR和DCR分别为28.5%和61.9%。联合治疗组的RR和DCR均高于单纯化疗组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.627、4.272,P=0.003、0.038);肝内1个病灶的RFA疗效优于2~5个,直径≤3 cm病灶的RFA疗效优于>3~6 cm(P<0.05)。联合治疗组的1、2、3年生存率依次为72.0%(18/25)、52.0%(13/25)和21.4%(7/25),均高于单纯化疗组的47.6%(10/21)、19.0%(4/21)和4.7%(1/21),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RFA主要并发症为发热和局部疼痛,两组化疗不良反应相似,以骨髓抑制和消化道反应为主,差异无统计学意义。

结论

RFA联合小剂量卡培他滨治疗老年大肠癌术后肝转移疗效确切,可有效控制肿瘤,延长患者生存期。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in combination with small doses of capecitabine for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

Methods

Among forty-six patients with colorectal liver metastasis from January 2010 to July 2015, 25 cases received RFA in combination with capecitabine regimen (combined therapy group) and the other 21 cases only received capecitabine regimen (chemotherapy alone group) with daily dose of 1 500 mg/m2, bid, for 2 weeks, with 3 weeks for a cycle. The curative effect of chemotherapy and RFA were analyzed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or three-phase enhanced CT, respectively. The long-term survival was followed up, and the complications of RFA and the chemotherapy-induced adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

In the combined therapy group, there were 13 cases of complete response (CR), 5 partial response (PR), 4 stable disease (SD) and 3 cases of progressive disease (PD), with the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 72.0% and 88.0%. In the chemotherapy alone group, there were 0 case of CR, 6 PR, 7 SD and 8 PD, with RR and DCR of 28.5% and 61.9%. There was higher DCR and RR in the combined treatment group compared with the chemotherapy alone group with a significant difference (χ2=8.627、4.272, P=0.003、0.038) . The curative effect of patients with one lesion was better than those with 2-5; and less than 3 cm in diameter was better than that of 3 to 6 cm; the survival rates of 1-, 2-, 3-year were 72.0% (18/25), 52.0% (13/25) and 21.4% (7/25) in the combined treatment group, higher than 47.6% (10/21), 19.0% (4/21) and 4.7% (1/21) of the chemotherapy alone group, respectively (P<0.05). The main complications of RFA were fever and local pain. There were similar adverse reactions in both groups, mainly including bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reaction, and the difference had no statistical significance.

Conclusion

RFA in combination with small dose of capecitabine chemotherapy treatment of colorectal liver metastasis can effectively control the tumor and prolong patients' survival.

表1 两组老年大肠癌术后肝转移患者的基本资料比较
表2 两组老年大肠癌术后肝转移患者化疗不良反应情况比较(例)
1
于广计,刘松,李强,等.射频消融术联合SOX方案治疗结直肠癌术后肝转移的疗效观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 21(11): 1036-1040.
2
中华医学会外科学分会胃肠外科学组,许剑民,任黎.结直肠癌肝转移诊断和综合治疗指南(V 2013) [J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2013, 16(8): 635.
3
Scorsetti M,Comito T,Tozzi A, et al. Final results of a phase Ⅱ trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inop-erable liver metastases from colorectal cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2015, 141(3): 543.
4
Guan Q,Gu J,Zhang H, et al. Correlation between vascular endo-thelial growth factor levels and prognosis of hepatocellular carci-noma patients receiving radiofrequency ablation[J]. Biotechnol Equip, 2015, 29(1): 119.
5
Minami Y,Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a literature review[J]. Gut Liver, 2013, 7(1): 1-6.
6
蒋丽华,刘学键,陈香利,等.射频消融术联合FOLFIRI方案化疗治疗大肠癌术后肝转移的临床研究[J].山东医学高等专科学校学报, 2016, 38(1): 50-54.
7
中华医学会放射学分会介入学组.经皮肝脏肿瘤射频消融治疗操作规范专家共识[J].中华放射学杂志, 2012, 46(7): 581-585.
8
周武元,李磊,钟敬涛,等.开腹射频消融治疗较大肝肿瘤近期疗效分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2013, 19(9): 677-680.
9
Kwan BY,Kielar AZ,El-Maraghi RH, et al. Retrospective review of efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases from a Canadian perspective [J]. Can As-soc Radiol J, 2014, 65(1): 77-85.
10
江素华,黄慧,曾波航.卡培他滨单药连用3周方案治疗老年晚期消化道肿瘤的临床观察[J].中国癌症杂志, 2010, 20(4): 281-284.
11
Glimelius B,Sørbye H,Balteskard L, et al. A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008, 19(5): 909-914.
12
王仲,袁娟.中等剂量卡培他滨在老年转移性结直肠癌序贯化疗中的应用[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2015, 23(3): 378-380.
13
赵红,李小龙,冯谢敏,等.小剂量卡培他滨单药治疗老年性晚期胃癌27例疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志, 2011, 40(5): 607-609.
14
孙媛媛,陈小燕,王克松.卡培他滨一线方案治疗高龄大肠癌的临床观察[J].河北医药, 2012, 34(18): 2792-2793.
15
高君,孙文兵,丁雪梅,等.射频消融治疗5 cm以下结直肠癌肝转移的远期疗效初步观察[J].中华外科杂志, 2011, 49(10): 954-956.
16
Ruers T,Punt C,Van Coevorden F, et al. Radiofrequency abla-tion combined with systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized EORTC Intergroup phase Ⅱ study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(10): 2619-2626.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[5] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[12] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[13] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[14] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要