切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 291 -293. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.04.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

支架与肠梗阻导管应用于腹腔镜手术左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻治疗分析
杨克辉1,(), 王科1   
  1. 1. 620400 眉山,仁寿县中医医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-21 出版日期:2016-08-01
  • 通信作者: 杨克辉

Treatment analysis of stent and obstruction catheter in laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction

Kehui Yang1,(), Ke Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Renshou County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meishan 620500, China
  • Received:2015-12-21 Published:2016-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Kehui Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Yang Kehui,Email:
引用本文:

杨克辉, 王科. 支架与肠梗阻导管应用于腹腔镜手术左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻治疗分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(04): 291-293.

Kehui Yang, Ke Wang. Treatment analysis of stent and obstruction catheter in laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(04): 291-293.

目的

探讨支架和梗阻导管治疗左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻患者的疗效以及治疗特点。

方法

选取本院2011年1月至2014年12月收治的左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻患者140例,随机分为支架组和导管组,每组70例。支架组在内镜下放置金属肠道支架减压治疗,导管组在肠镜及X线辅助下采用经肛放置肠梗阻导管治疗。梗阻消失后对患者实施一期肿瘤根治性切除手术。比较两组患者梗阻缓解手术情况、梗阻改善情况以及一期肿瘤根治性切除手术的效果。

结果

导管组中患者梗阻手术成功率明显高于支架组(χ2=2.387,P=0.003),操作时间及手术费用明显低于支架组(t=21.754、165.009,均P<0.01);导管组中患者腹痛腹胀缓解时间明显长于支架组(t=18.017,P<0.01);两组患者术后排气时间、术后禁食时间以及住院时间差异无统计学意义(t=1.640、1.314、1.880,均P>0.05)。随访期间两组患者并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.624,P=0.430)。

结论

采用金属肠道支架治疗左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻患者腹痛腹胀缓解快,而采用经肛放置肠梗阻导管手术成功率高,复发率低,所需费用低且操作时间短。

Objective

To investigate the treatment of left colonic cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction.

Methods

One hundred and forty left colonic cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction were selected from Januray 2011 to December 2014, and were randomly divided into the stent group (treated with metallic stent assisted by endoscopy and X-ray) and the catheter group (treated with transanal ileus tube assisted by endoscopy and X-ray) , with 70 cases in each group. The relief of obstruction for radical resection, improvement of obstruction, and effect of radical excision surgery between the two groups were compared.

Results

The surgical success rate of catheter obstruction was higher than that in the stent group (χ2=2.387, P=0.003) . The operation time and expenditure of the catheter group were significantly lower than the stent group (t=21.754, 165.009, all P<0.01) . The abdominal pain relief time of the catheter group was significantly longer than that of the stent group (t=18.017, P<0.01) . The postoperative exhaustion time, postoperative fasting time and hospitalization time of the two groups had no significant difference (t=1.640, 1.314, 1.880, all P>0.05) . The difference of the complications of the two groups was not statistically significant during follow-up (χ2=0.624, P=0.430) .

Conclusion

For left colorectal cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction, metallic stents treatment can shorten relief time, while obstruction catheter treatment has the advantages of higher success rate, shorter operation time and lower cost.

表1 两组大肠癌并发肠梗组患者的一般资料比较(例)
表2 两组患者的手术情况、治疗效果比较(各70例, ± s
1
Allemani C,Rachet B,Weir HK, et al. Colorectal cancer survival in the USA and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study[J]. BMJ Open, 2013, 3(9): e003055.
2
陈光兴,陈媛,彭自力.大肠癌并发肠梗阻外科治疗89例临床分析[J].河北医学, 2012, 18(2): 216-218.
3
彭艳飞,冯敏,郭红平,等.肠道支架参与癌性肠梗阻治疗1例[J].结直肠肛门外科, 2014, 20(3): 211.
4
蔺兵虎.大肠癌并发肠梗阻一期手术治疗的疗效及并发症观察[J].实用癌症杂志, 2014, 29(4): 475-476, 479.
5
张桂祥,袁松亮,周家军,等.左半结肠癌梗阻型患者急诊手术及肠道支架手术疗效分析[J].浙江临床医学, 2014, 16(12): 1890-1891.
6
黄宣,吕宾,范一宏,等.肠道支架序贯手术治疗与急诊手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌疗效的荟萃分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2012, 2(2): 88-93.
7
沈毅慧,刘江奎,李桓,等.经肛型肠梗阻导管在梗阻性左半结直肠癌术前的应用价值[J].中国医师进修杂志, 2014, 37(17): 53-55.
8
张方信,绍珂,于晓辉,等.肠道支架置入治疗结肠恶性梗阻的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志, 2012,18(1): 29-33.
9
李阳春. 183例外科治疗大肠癌并发肠梗阻的临床疗效评价[J].医学信息, 2015, 28(6): 206.
[1] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[2] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[3] 崔宏帅, 冯丽明, 东维玲, 韩博. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术+IGLN清扫术治疗局部进展期结肠肝曲癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[4] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[5] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[6] 李佳伟, 庞建智, 闫鹏宇, 卫阳兵, 杨晓峰. 术中输尿管识别技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 520-524.
[7] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[8] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 关国欣, 罗福文. 结肠癌合并急性梗阻的个性化处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 459-463.
[11] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[12] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[13] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[14] 靳英, 付小霞, 陈美茹, 袁璐, 郝力瑶. CD147调控MAPK信号通路对结肠癌细胞增殖和凋亡的影响及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 474-480.
[15] 牟磊, 徐东成, 韩鑫, 徐长江, 韩坤锜, 薛叶潇, 牟媛, 秦文玲, 刘相静, 陈哲, 高楠. 五虫通络胶囊防治椎动脉开口支架术后再狭窄发生的效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 467-472.
阅读次数
全文


摘要