切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 397 -400. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.06.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

年龄对胃癌手术短期临床结局影响的回顾性分析
曹明晓1, 姜立新1,(), 胡金晨1, 陈剑2   
  1. 1. 264000 烟台,青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院胃肠外一、甲状腺外科
    2. 264000 烟台,青岛大学中心实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-04 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通信作者: 姜立新

Retrospective analysis of the impact of age on the short-term clinical outcomes of gastric cancer surgery

Mingxiao Cao1, Lixin Jiang1,(), Jinchen Hu1, Jian Chen2   

  1. 1. The First Department of Gastrointestinal and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University-Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
    2. Central Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University-Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
  • Received:2015-11-04 Published:2016-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Lixin Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Lixin, Email:
引用本文:

曹明晓, 姜立新, 胡金晨, 陈剑. 年龄对胃癌手术短期临床结局影响的回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(06): 397-400.

Mingxiao Cao, Lixin Jiang, Jinchen Hu, Jian Chen. Retrospective analysis of the impact of age on the short-term clinical outcomes of gastric cancer surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(06): 397-400.

目的

探讨年龄对胃癌手术患者短期临床结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2008年5月到2012年9月收治的432例胃癌患者的临床病理资料,根据年龄将所有纳入患者分为老年组(≥60岁)230例和对照组(<60岁)202例,应用χ2检验、独立样本t检验及非参数检验对各分组患者的临床资料进行比较,用多因素Logistic回归分析各危险因素与术后30 d内发生并发症的关系。

结果

两组术前合并症数量、ASA评分、第一次排气时间明显不同,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。老年组术后肺部感染率为3.91%(9/230)高于对照组的0.99%(2/202),差异接近有统计学意义(χ2=3.703,P=0.054)。老年组术后并发症的发生率为24.78%(57/230),略高于对照组的22.28%(45/202),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.374,P=0.541)。而老年患者术后需要ICU监护的比例为14.78%(34/230),显著高于对照组的1.98%(4/202)(χ2=21.972,P<0.01)。

结论

年龄不是影响患者术后并发症的独立危险因素。通过术前风险评估,术中安全监护,对于老年胃癌患者行肿瘤根治术是安全可行的。

Objective

To investigate the impact of age on the short-term clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of four hundred and thirty-two gastric cancer patients who received surgical therapy between May 2008 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 230 patients aged over 60 years were set as old age group, and the other 202 patients were set as control group. The clinical outcomes occurring within 30 days after operation were compared between the two groups by chi. square test, independent-samples t test or non-parametric test. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors.

Results

There were significant differences in the number of preoperative comorbidities, the scores of ASA, the first flatus time (P<0.05) between the two groups. The rate of postoperative pulmonary infection of elderly patients was higher than that of control group, though the difference was not statistically significant (3.91% vs 0.99%, χ2=3.703, P=0.054). The incidence rate of postoperative complication was 24.78%(57/230), which was slightly higher than that of control group (22.28%, 45/202), and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.374, P=0.541). The ratio of elderly patients who needed ICU immediately after surgery was 14.78% (34/230), which was significantly higher than that of control group (1.98%, 4/202) (χ2=21.972, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Age is not an independent risk factor that influences postoperative complication of gastric cancer. It is feasible and safe to perform radical gastrectomy on elderly patients of gastric cancer for safety monitoring during the operation.

表1 老年组与对照组胃癌患者基线数据比较
表2 两组胃癌患者手术结局及术后并发症情况
表3 胃癌根治术后患者并发症影响因素的多因素Logistic分析
1
Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
2
Bertuccio P,Chatenoud L,Levi F, et al. Recent patterns in gas-tric cancer: a global overview[J]. Int J Cancer, 2009, 125(3): 666-673.
3
Polanczyk CA,Marcantonio E,Goldman L,Rohde LE, et al. Im-pact of age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2001, 134 (8): 637-643.
4
Saklad M,Sellman P. Statistical systems in anesthesiology[J]. An-esthesiology, 1946, 7(2): 146-160.
5
Dindo D,Demartines N,Clavien PA. Classification of surgical com-plications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6 336 pa-tients and results of a survey [J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
6
Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(12): 3077-3079.
7
杨志峰,江小梅.胃癌患者远近期预后影响因素的COX模型分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2014, 8(3): 209-212.
8
Enzinger P. Gastrointestinal cancer in older patients[J]. Semin Oncol, 2004, 31(2): 206-219.
9
陈磊,吕文杰,张文杰,等.老年胃癌患者手术风险因素分析[J].中华消化杂志, 2010, 30(9): 602-605.
10
徐梦.年龄对胃癌择期手术患者围术期各类并发症发生率影响分析[J].中国实用医药, 2013, 8(4): 103-104.
11
Kim MG,Kim HS,Kim BS, et al. The impact of old age on surgi-cal outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(11): 3990-3997.
12
王正林,胡祥.老年胃癌特点及手术治疗进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2010, 17(1): 37-39.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[8] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[9] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[10] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[11] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[12] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[13] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[14] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[15] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
阅读次数
全文


摘要