切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 168 -171. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.03.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

中央型与外周型乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的临床病理特点比较
高进1, 唐炜1, 叶熹罡1, 陈伦1, 谭维格1, 潘凌霄1, 张晓申1, 郑文博1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州医科大学附属第一医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郑文博
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81402203); 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20151A011074)

Comparison of the characteristics of central papillomas and peripheral papillomas

Jin Gao1, Wei Tang1, Xigang Ye1, Lun Chen1, Weige Tan1, Lingxiao Pan1, Xiaoshen Zhang1, Wenbo Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenbo Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Wenbo, Email:
引用本文:

高进, 唐炜, 叶熹罡, 陈伦, 谭维格, 潘凌霄, 张晓申, 郑文博. 中央型与外周型乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的临床病理特点比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 168-171.

Jin Gao, Wei Tang, Xigang Ye, Lun Chen, Weige Tan, Lingxiao Pan, Xiaoshen Zhang, Wenbo Zheng. Comparison of the characteristics of central papillomas and peripheral papillomas[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(03): 168-171.

目的

探讨并比较中央型乳腺导管内乳头状瘤(IP)与外周型导管内乳头状瘤(IPS)的临床病理特点和预后。

方法

回顾性分析2004年1月至2013年12月广州医科大学附属第一医院收治的119例乳腺导管内乳头状瘤患者的临床资料,其中IP患者76例,IPS患者43例。对入组患者随访1~7年。

结果

全部入组患者均为女性,高发年龄段为30~49岁。与IP患者不典型增生率(11.8%)相比,IPS患者的发生率(41.9%)较高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.108, P=0.000),且癌变性也较高(χ2=8.602, P=0.003)。在临床表现为肿块的乳头状瘤患者中超声的诊断敏感度显著高于X线钼靶片(χ2=66.234,P<0.01)。对临床表现为乳头溢液的患者,纤维乳管镜检查有很高的准确性(84.1%),并且对于IP患者的检查准确性高于IPS患者(χ2=7.729, P=0.005)。IP与IPS均具有一定的复发率,并且IPS有更高的复发率(χ2=6.426 , P=0.011)。

结论

与IP相比,IPS更容易合并不典型增生以及癌变;对于临床表现为肿块的乳头状瘤,超声检查优于钼靶片检查。IPS更容易复发,需要更加密切的临床随访。

Objective

To investigate and compare the characteristics and prognosis of intraductal papilloma (IP) and intraductal papillomatosis (IPS).

Methods

The clinical data of one hundred and nineteen cases diagnosed as IP and IPS by pathology were collected and analyzed retrospectively, with 76 IP patients and 43 IPS patients. They were followed up for 1 to 7 years.

Results

All patients were female, aged from 12 to 79 years old, with a median age of 45 years old. Both of the two diseases mainly distributed from 30 to 49 years old. Compared with IP, IPS patients were more likely to have atypical hyperplasia (11.8% vs 41.9%) , with significant difference (χ2=14.108, P=0.000), and malignant component (χ2=8.602, P =0.003). Ultrasonography was more sensitive than mammography when the two types of diseases showed as mass (χ2=66.234, P<0.01). The accuracy rate of fiberoptic ductoscopy in the patients with nipple discharge was very high (84.1%), especially in IPS patients (χ2=7.729, P=0.005). Both of the two types diseases may recur, with higher percentage in IPS (χ2=6.426, P=0.011).

Conclusions

Atypical hyperplasia and malignant tumour are more likely observed in IPS patients. Ultrasound is more sensitive than mammography when the two diseases showed as mass. Peripheral papillomas is more inclined to recur and needs more attention.

图1 IP与IPS相对发病风险年龄分布
表1 IP与IPS患者临床病理特点分析[n(%)]
表2 IP患者与IPS患者溢液特点比较[n(%)]
图2 IP与IPS患者的复发风险分析
[1]
阮玫,赵亚娥,汪登斌, 等. 乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的乳腺专用磁共振成像表现及其诊断价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2013, 28(3):341-345.
[2]
Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the breast[M]. Lyon: IARC Press, 2012.
[3]
韩昌,刘冬良,周峰,等. 生物钟基因CLOCK蛋白对甲状腺乳头状癌的影响[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2016, 10(3):179-182.
[4]
Pooja J, Felicity JP, Thomas CP, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast: imaging findings and diagnostic challenges[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2013, 19(6):471-478.
[5]
MacGragan G, Moinfar F, Raju U. Intraductal papillary neoplasms. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors.World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs[M]. Lyon: IARC press, 2003: 76-80.
[6]
Basavaiah SH, Minal J, Screeram S, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls in papillary lesions of the breast: experience from a single tertiary care center[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(8):EC18-EC21.
[7]
Ait Benkaddour Y, EI Hasnaoui S, Fichtali K. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast: report of three cases and literature review[J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2012:979563.
[8]
Nassar H, Qureshi H, Volkanadsay N, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of solid papillary carcinoma of the breast and associated invasive carcinomas[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2006, 30(4):501-507.
[9]
Sohn YM, Park SH. Comparison of sonographically guided coreneedle biopsy and excision in breast papillomas: clinical and sonographic features predictive of malignancy[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32(2):303-311.
[10]
Eiada R, Chong J, Kulkarni S, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI, ultrasound and mammographic appearances[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(2):264-271.
[11]
连臻强,张江宇,王颀, 等. 纤维乳管镜及液基细胞学检查对病理性乳头溢液的诊断价值[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2012, 19(10):770-773.
[12]
张云微,曲文志. 纤维乳管镜101例乳头溢液诊断分析[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015, 18(10):788-790.
[13]
Kibil W, Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D, Popiela TJ, et al. Mammotome biopsy in diagnosing and treatment of intraductal papilloma of the breast[J]. Pol Przegl Chi, 2013, 85(4):210-215.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[11] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[12] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[13] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[14] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要