切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 243 -246. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.04.007

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

螺旋CT评估直肠系膜侵润程度及环周切缘状态与直肠癌预后的关系
覃大明1, 赵慧艳1,(), 谭必勇1, 唐伟华1, 周孟1, 尹涛2   
  1. 1. 445000 湖北省恩施州中心医院放射科
    2. 430079 武汉,湖北省肿瘤医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-18 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 赵慧艳
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生厅科研一般项目(JX6B85)

Study on the relationship between the degree of mesorectal invasion and circumferential margin status in rectal cancer and its prognosis

Daming Qin1, Huiyan Zhao1,(), Biyong Tan1, Weihua Tang1, Meng Zhou1, Tao Yin2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Enshi Central Hospital, Enshi 445000, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Hubei Tumor Hospital, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2017-04-18 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Huiyan Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Huiyan, Email:
引用本文:

覃大明, 赵慧艳, 谭必勇, 唐伟华, 周孟, 尹涛. 螺旋CT评估直肠系膜侵润程度及环周切缘状态与直肠癌预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 243-246.

Daming Qin, Huiyan Zhao, Biyong Tan, Weihua Tang, Meng Zhou, Tao Yin. Study on the relationship between the degree of mesorectal invasion and circumferential margin status in rectal cancer and its prognosis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 243-246.

目的

利用术前螺旋CT检查研究直肠癌直肠系膜侵润程度及环周切缘(CRM)状态与患者预后的关系。

方法

选取恩施州中心医院2010年2月至2014年2月120例被确诊为直肠癌的患者,对拟行手术治疗的患者行术前螺旋CT检查,术后随访直肠系膜侵润程度与CRM状态,Kaplan-Meier曲线计算生存率,Pearson相关检验与患者预后关系。

结果

120例直肠系膜侵润程度Ⅰ度、Ⅱ度、Ⅲ度的患者各51、32、37例,其中局部复发率分别为3.9%、6.2%、45.9%,远处转移发生率分别为13.7%、28.1%、59.5%,3年生存率分别为86.3%、65.6%、32.4%。120例患者CRM状态呈阳性21例,阴性99例,阳性患者的局部复发率、远处转移发生率、死亡率均高于阴性患者(38.1% vs 13.1%,χ2=6.358,P=0.016;66.7% vs 24.2%,χ2=11.236,P=0.001;76.2% vs 27.3%,χ2=16.359,P=0.000)。生存曲线及相关性分析显示直肠系膜侵润程度越低,患者3年生存率越高(P=0.012),直肠系膜侵润程度与术后生存时间呈负相关(r=-0.52);CRM状态为阴性患者死亡率明显低于阳性患者(P=0.005),CRM状态与术后生存时间呈负相关(r=-0.71);Cox回归模型显示是否远处转移、直肠系膜侵润程度、CRM状态3个因素是影响患者生存的独立预后影响因素。

结论

直肠系膜侵润程度、环周切缘状态与患者生存时间呈负相关,直肠系膜侵润程度、环周切缘状态、是否远处转移是影响直肠癌患者预后重要因素,直肠癌患者术前CT检查值得临床关注。

Objective

To study the relationship between degree of mesorectal invasion and circumferential margin (CRM) status in rectal cancer by preoperative CT scan.

Methods

From February 2010 to February 2014, one hundred and twenty cases of rectal cancer were selected from Enshi Central Hospital, preoperative spiral CT examinations were performed on patients undergoing surgery. The mesorectal invasion and the status of CRM were followed up, and the relationship with prognosis was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Pearson method.

Results

In the 120 patients, there were 51, 32 and 37 cases with mesorectal invasive degree of Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ. In each degree group, there was 3.9%, 6.2% and 45.9% with local recurrence; distant metastasis incidence rate 13.7%, 28.1%, 59.5%; the 3-year survival rate was 86.3%, 65.6% and 32.4%, respectively. CRM status was positive in 21 cases, negative in 99 cases. Compared to the negative cases, local recurrence rate, the incidence of distant metastasis and mortality were higher in the positive cases (38.1% vs 13.1%, χ2=6.358, P=0.016; 66.7% vs 24.2%, χ2=11.236, P=0.001; 76.2% vs 27.3%, χ2=16.359, P=0.000). Survival analysis showed that the lower the invasive degree of the mesorectum, the higher the 3-year survival rate of the patients, and the mortality in patients whose CRM was negative was significantly lower than that in the positive patients (P=0.012). There was a negative correlation between the invasiveness of the mesorectum and the postoperative survival time (r=-0.52). The mortality of patients with negative CRM was significantly lower than that of the positive patients (P=0.005). A negative correlation between CRM status and postoperative survival time (r=-0.71) was found. Cox regression showed distant metastasis, the degree of mesorectal invasion, and CRM status were independent prognostic factors of survival.

Conclusions

Mesorectal invasion and circumferential resection margin status was negatively correlated with the survival time, while mesorectal invasion, circumferential resection margin status, and metastasis are important prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer. Preoperative CT examination is worthy of attention.

图1 直肠系膜侵润程度示意图Ⅰ度:T1、T2期,环周切缘(-);Ⅱ度:1/3≤直肠系膜浸润程度≤2/3,T3期;Ⅲ度:T4期,环周切缘(-)或(+)
表1 直肠癌患者螺旋CT直肠系膜侵润程度对预后的单因素分析[χ2检验]
表2 直肠癌患者螺旋CT环周切缘状态对预后的单因素分析[n(%),χ2检验]
表3 120例直肠癌患者的多因素预后分析
[1]
鲁家贤,童铁军,董孙根, 等. 结直肠癌多层螺旋CT浸润征像与病理预后因子的关系[J]. 浙江医学, 2015, 34(6):469-472.
[2]
唐上坤,张效杰,林华姝, 等. 多层螺旋CT在直肠癌全系膜切除术前的应用价值[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2016, 37(26):3255-3258.
[3]
李广润,缪广林,杨春雷, 等. 多层螺旋CT诊断在结直肠癌治疗方案选择中的应用价值[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(12):1390-1392.
[4]
卢晓林. 16排螺旋CT检查在直肠癌诊断与术前评估中的应用价值[J]. 浙江医学, 2015, 37(8):706.
[5]
吴洪国,冯野. 直肠癌分期的研究进展[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2017, 21(1):177-180.
[6]
蒋松松,陈刚,吴鸿雁, 等. 中低位直肠癌环周切缘微转移与临床病理特征的相关性初探[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(4):241-246.
[7]
甄亚男,肖瑞雪,石会勇, 等. 腹腔镜辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(6):702-707.
[8]
施明. 多排螺旋CT在直肠癌术前诊断中的应用价值分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2016, 11(36):51-53.
[9]
顾乐锋,余捷,翁晓海, 等. 螺旋CT在直肠癌诊断中应用价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2015, 25(1):99-101.
[10]
郝亚涛,董强,赵军苍, 等. 螺旋CT、增强MRI及血清VEGF-C水平检测联合诊断直肠癌的临床价值分析[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2016, 9(7):131-132.
[11]
谢强,雷海花,林焕西, 等. 64层螺旋CT灌注成像早期诊断直肠癌术后复发的价值[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2015, 22(1):5-7.
[12]
Fernández Ananín S, Targarona EM, Martinez C, et al. Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(12):3458-3466.
[13]
Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, et al. A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(8):933-940.
[14]
Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, et al. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015, 58(3):275-282.
[15]
Hoeffel C, Mulé S, Laurent V, et al. Primary rectal cancer local staging[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2014, 95(5):485-494.
[16]
Kim YC, Kim JK, Kim MJ, et al. Feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion in predicting early distant metastasis in patients with stage T3 rectal cancer based on rectal MRI[J]. Europ Radiol, 2016, 26(2):297-305.
[17]
库雷志,马明平,包强, 等. 直肠癌高分辨MRI临床研究相关进展[J]. 放射学实践, 2015, 30(5):603-606.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[7] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[8] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[9] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[10] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要