切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 380 -384. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.06.005

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

术前血清癌胚抗原联合外周血小板检测对结直肠癌患者预后评估的价值
黄利军1, 魏波1, 郑宗珩1, 方佳峰1, 陈图锋1, 刘健培1, 卫洪波1, 黄勇1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-26 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 黄勇
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81472825); 广东省自然科学基金项目(2014A030313078); 广东市科技计划项目产学研协同创新重大专项资助项目(2014Y2-00503); 广东省科技计划项目产学研合作项目(2014B090901066)

Prognostic value of combining preoperative serum CEA and peripheral platelet detection in patients with colorectal cancer

Lijun Huang1, Bo Wei1, Zongheng Zheng1, Jiafeng Fang1, Tufeng Chen1, Jianpei Liu1, Hongbo Wei1, Yong Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2017-07-26 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Yong, Email:
引用本文:

黄利军, 魏波, 郑宗珩, 方佳峰, 陈图锋, 刘健培, 卫洪波, 黄勇. 术前血清癌胚抗原联合外周血小板检测对结直肠癌患者预后评估的价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(06): 380-384.

Lijun Huang, Bo Wei, Zongheng Zheng, Jiafeng Fang, Tufeng Chen, Jianpei Liu, Hongbo Wei, Yong Huang. Prognostic value of combining preoperative serum CEA and peripheral platelet detection in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(06): 380-384.

目的

探讨术前外周血小板计数(PLT)与血清癌胚抗原水平(CEA)联合检测对结直肠癌患者预后评估的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年5月中山大学附属第三医院收治的297例结直肠癌患者临床病理资料,随访5年。卡方检验分析CEA阳性(CEA≥5 μg/L)与PLT计数阳性(PLT≥350×109/L)的影响因素。Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,Log-rank检验比较生存率;COX回归分析预后的独立危险因素。

结果

(1)术前血清CEA阳性与结直肠癌患者脉管癌栓、神经侵犯、浸润深度、淋巴结转移、远处转移及TNM分期较晚相关(χ2=5.743、5.699、10.308、15.543、43.537、21.199,P=0.017、0.017、0.028、<0.01、<0.01、<0.01);PLT阳性与性别、年龄、肿瘤位置、肿瘤大小、浸润深度、远处转移显著相关(χ2=13.409、7.749、8.496、7.324、9.295、9.196,P<0.01、0.005、0.014、0.007、0.038、0.002)。(2)生存分析提示术前血清CEA阳性、外周PLT阳性均提示不良预后(χ2=36.926、6.892,均P<0.01)。CEA及PLT双阴性、单阳性以及双阳性患者的5年生存率分别为80.2%、51.1%、45.5%,中位生存时间分别为69、61、28个月,差异有统计学意义(χ2=36.506,P<0.01)。(3)COX多因素回归分析提示肿瘤位置、神经侵犯、远处转移、TNM分期是影响患者预后的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。

结论

术前血清CEA与外周血小板联合检测可为判断结直肠癌患者预后提供重要信息。

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) combined with peripheral platelet count (PLT) in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

From January 2010 to May 2012, clinical-pathological data of two hundred and ninety-seven colorectal cancer patients treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University who finished 5 years’ follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The risk factors of CEA positive (CEA≥5 μg/L) and PLT positive (PLT≥350×109/L) were judged by Chi-square test. The survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier regression and COX regression were done to investigate the prognostic value of CEA and PLT in colorectal cancer.

Results

(1) Positivity of preoperative serum CEA was significantly related to vascular cancer embolus, nerve invasion, the depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and TNM stages (χ2=5.743, 5.699, 10.308, 15.543, 43.537, 21.199, P=0.017, 0.017, 0.028, <0.01, <0.01, <0.01), while gender, age, the size of tumor, tumor position, the depth of invasion and distant metastasis were significantly related to PLT positivity (χ2=13.409, 7.749, 8.496, 7.324, 9.295, 9.196, P<0.01, 0.005, 0.014, 0.007, 0.038, 0.002). (2) Survival analysis found that positive CEA, PLT and their combination suggested poor prognosis (χ2=36.926, 6.892, 34.821, P<0.01). The 5-year survival rate of neither, either and both positivity of CEA and PLT were 80.2%, 51.1%, 45.5%, while the median survival time was 69, 61, 28 months with statistical difference (χ2=36.506, P<0.01). (3) COX regression revealed that the location of the tumor, nerve invasion, distant metastasis and TNM stages were the independent risk factors for the colorectal cancer (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Combination of preoperative serum CEA and peripheral PLT can provide prognostic information for patients with colorectal cancer.

表1 术前血清CEA、外周PLT与结直肠癌患者临床病理因素的关系(例,χ2检验)
图1 不同指标结直肠癌患者的生存曲线A为CEA阳性患者生存显著差于阴性患者;B为PLT阳性患者生存显著差于阴性患者;C为并联检测阳性(CEA或PLT阳性)患者生存显著差于阴性患者;D为CEA及PLT双阴性、单个阳性及双阳性患者生存曲线图,双阳性患者预后最差
表2 影响结直肠癌患者预后的COX多因素回归分析
[1]
Hoshino N, Hasegawa S, Hida K, et al. Nomogram for predicting recurrence in stageⅡ colorectal cancer[J]. Acta Oncol, 2016, 55(12):1414-1417.
[2]
Wang J, Wang X, Yu F, et al. Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015, 8(11):14853-14863.
[3]
章志丹,张君严,鲁翀. 结直肠癌患者血小板与淋巴细胞比值对预后影响Meta分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2016, 23(20):1376-1381.
[4]
陈莉玲,张礼,李玥伶, 等. 术前血小板计数与结直肠癌患者预后的关系[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2016, 36(4):482-487.
[5]
Huang XZ, Chen WJ, Zhang X, et al. An elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with colorectal cancer: a Meta-analysis[J]. Dis Markers, 2017, 2017:1053125.
[6]
Long Y, Wang T, Gao Q, et al. Prognostic significance of pretreatment elevated platelet count in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(49):81849-81861.
[7]
Kim JH, Lee JY, Kim HK, et al. Prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with stageⅢ andⅣ colorectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(3):505-515.
[8]
Peng J, Li H, Qu Q, et al. Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio represents a superior predictor compared with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for colorectal liver-only metastases survival[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2017, 10:3789-3799.
[9]
唐少顷,林凯鸿,黄泽宝, 等. 术前血小板计数对结直肠癌患者预后的预测价值分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2016, 6(17):133-137.
[10]
刘静. 血常规、生化以及肿瘤标志物联合检测在结直肠癌患者筛查中的应用价值[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2016, 26(22):3278-3279+3282.
[11]
周晓爽,赵芹,魏梦欢, 等. 血小板与结直肠癌预后相关性的研究进展[J]. 胃肠病学, 2014, 19(6):380-382.
[12]
Peng Y, Zhai Z, Li Z, et al. Role of blood tumor markers in predicting metastasis and local recurrence after curative resection of colon cancer[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(1):982-990.
[13]
Shimura T, Toiyama Y, Saigusa S, et al. Inflammation-based prognostic scores as indicators to select candidates for primary site resection followed by multimodal therapy among colorectal cancer patients with multiple metastases[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2017, 22(4):758-766.
[14]
Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, et al. Combination of platelet count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a useful predictor of postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2013, 109(2):401-407.
[15]
Akgul O, Cetinkaya E, Yalaza M, et al. Prognostic efficacy of inflammation-based markers in patients with curative colorectal cancer resection[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2017, 9(7):300-307.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[9] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要