切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 246 -250. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

栓塞化疗及射频的序贯应用对大肝癌术后复发防治的价值
周载平1, 胡泽民1,(), 常晓健1, 何坤1, 孙强1, 陈天宇1   
  1. 1. 528403 中山大学附属中山医院 中山市人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-15 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 胡泽民
  • 基金资助:
    中山市科技计划项目(20132A123,2015B1092)

Prevention and treatment value of sequential application of transcathater arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency for recurrence of large hepatocellular carcinoma

Zaiping Zhou1, Zemin Hu1,(), Xiaojian Chang1, Kun He1, Qiang Sun1, Tianyu Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People’s Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528403, China
  • Received:2017-05-15 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zemin Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Zemin, Email:
引用本文:

周载平, 胡泽民, 常晓健, 何坤, 孙强, 陈天宇. 栓塞化疗及射频的序贯应用对大肝癌术后复发防治的价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 246-250.

Zaiping Zhou, Zemin Hu, Xiaojian Chang, Kun He, Qiang Sun, Tianyu Chen. Prevention and treatment value of sequential application of transcathater arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency for recurrence of large hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 246-250.

目的

探讨术后栓塞化疗(TACE)和射频消融(RFA)的序贯应用对大肝癌术后复发的防治效果。

方法

回顾性分析2004年1月至2015年12月中山市人民医院大肝癌手术切除113例,其中术后53例行TACE(TACE组),34例行TACE和RFA(TACE+RFA组),26例行单纯手术切除治疗(单纯切除组)。以术后总体生存期,术后1、3、5年生存率,术后1、2、3年复发率等指标评价3组患者的中远期疗效。

结果

(1)TACE组、TACE+RFA组和单纯切除组患者的中位生存时间分别为39.0、49.0、29.0个月,TACE+RFA组中位生存时间最长,单纯切除组最短(χ2=12.5,P=0.002)。(2)TACE组术后1、3、5年生存率分别为86.8%、62.2%、34.0%,TACE+RFA组为82.3%、55.8%、41.1%,单纯手术组为76.9%、34.6%、19.2%,3组患者术后3、5年生存率差异有统计学意义,远期生存率以TACE+RFA组为最高(P<0.05)。(3)TACE组术后1、2、3年复发率分别为15.1%、33.9%、62.2%,TACE+RFA组为29.4%、55.9%、70.5%,单纯手术组为23.1%、42.3%、80.7%。单纯切除组3年复发率明显高于术后TACE组及TACE+RFA组,所有年复发率以术后TACE组为最低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

术后TACE可预防大肝癌术后中、远期复发,而TACE联合RFA的序贯性应用能明显改善大肝癌术后复发的预后。

Objective

To investigate the value of sequential implications of transcathater arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for postoperative recurrence of large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

From January 2004 to December 2015, one hundred and thirteen cases undergoing liver cancer resection in Zhongshan City People’s Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. TACE was performed in 53 cases after operation (TACE group), TACE+RFA in 34 cases (TACE+RFA group), and 26 cases were treated with simple resection (simple resection group). The overall survival, postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates, 1-, 2-, 3-year recurrence rates were used to evaluate the long-term effects of the three groups.

Results

(1) The median survival time was 39.0, 49.0, 29.0 months in TACE group, TACE+RFA group and simple resection group, respectively. The median survival time of TACE+RFA group was the longest, and the simple resection group was the shortest (χ2=12.5, P=0.002). (2) The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in TACE group were 86.8%, 62.2% and 34.0%, respectively; 82.3%, 55.8% and 41.1% in TACE+RFA group, while those in simple resection group were 76.9%, 34.6% and 19.2% respectively. The 3-, 5-year survival rates of the 3 groups were statistically significant, and the long-term survival rate was the highest in the TACE+RFA group (P<0.05). (3) The 1-, 2-, and 3-year recurrence rate was 15.1%, 33.9% and 62.2% in TACE group; 29.4%, 55.9% and 70.5% in TACE+RFA group; 23.1%, 42.3% and 80.7% in simple resection group, respectively. The 3-year recurrence rate in simple resection group was significantly higher than the other two groups, and all the annual recurrence rates were the lowest in TACE group after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Postoperative TACE can prevent middle and long term recurrence of large liver carcinoma after operation. The sequential application of TACE combined with RFA can significantly improve the prognosis of large hepatocellular carcinoma with postoperative recurrence.

表1 113例大肝癌患者的基础临床资料
表2 113例大肝癌患者术后复发和生存情况比较(%)
图1 113例大肝癌术后生存曲线(Kaplan-Meier法)
[1]
林泽毅,朱少亮,黄山, 等. 单发小肝癌规则切除与非规则切除疗效及其预后因素分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2015, 22(14): 1128-1133.
[2]
左朝晖,欧阳永忠,朱海珍. 原发性大肝癌的外科治疗[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2012, 21(1): 9-12.
[3]
Tsai TJ, Chau GY, Lui WY, et al. Clinical significance of microscopic tumor venous invasion in patient s with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Surgery, 2000, 127(6): 603-608.
[4]
Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Liver Transpl, 2005, 11(9): 1086-1092.
[5]
Li C, Wen TF, Yan LN, et al. Liver resection versus liver resection plus TACE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria[J]. J Surg Res, 2017, 209: 8-16.
[6]
Dong ZR, Zhang PF, Wang CH, et al. Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective analysis[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2014, 5(1): 450-457.
[7]
张尊义,董汉华. 肝切除术后联合肝动脉化疗栓塞综合治疗大肝癌中长期生存率[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2016, 37(5): 795-797.
[8]
Buscarini E, Savoia A, Brambilla G, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors[J]. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(5): 884-894.
[9]
Veltri A, Morette P, Doriguzzi A, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)as a combined therapy for unresectable non-early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[J]. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(3): 661-669.
[10]
Yang LY, Fang F, Ou DP, et al. Solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma: a specific subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma with good outcome after hepatic resection[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(1): 118-123.
[11]
范文哲,李家平,杨建勇, 等. 无法手术切除的肝细胞癌TACE与RFA治疗的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 5(1): 62-67.
[12]
Peng ZW, ZhangYJ, Liang HH, et al. Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential transcatheter arterial chemoemboliztion and RF ablation Versus RF ablation alone: A prospective randomized trial[J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(2): 689-700.
[13]
Koh PS, Chan AC, Cheung TT, et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation compared with transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative survival analysis[J]. HPB, 2016, 18(1): 72-78.
[14]
Park W, Chung YH, Kim JA, et al. Recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma following complete remission by transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency therapy: focused on the recurrence patterns[J]. Hepatol Res, 2013, 43(12): 1304-1312.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[4] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[5] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[6] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[7] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[8] 蒋正东, 李徐奇, 王曙逢, 魏光兵. 复发性腹股沟疝的腹腔镜手术策略及疗效观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 539-543.
[9] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[10] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[11] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[12] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[13] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[14] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要