切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 269 -272. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.04.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同给药剂量艾司洛尔对神经监测下甲状腺手术麻醉诱导效果的影响
李静1, 曾玲双2,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安医学院第二附属医院麻醉科
    2. 750001 宁夏银川市第一人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-16 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 曾玲双

Different dosages of esmolol on the effect of anesthetic induction for thyroid surgery under neural monitoring

Jing Li1, Lingshuang Zeng2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an 710038, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, the First People’s Hospital of Yinchuan, Yinchuan 750001, China
  • Received:2018-01-16 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Lingshuang Zeng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zeng Lingshuang, Email:
引用本文:

李静, 曾玲双. 不同给药剂量艾司洛尔对神经监测下甲状腺手术麻醉诱导效果的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 269-272.

Jing Li, Lingshuang Zeng. Different dosages of esmolol on the effect of anesthetic induction for thyroid surgery under neural monitoring[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 269-272.

目的

研究不同给药剂量艾司洛尔对神经监测下甲状腺手术麻醉诱导效果影响情况。

方法

选取2016年10月至2017年10月在西安医学院第二附属医院诊断并经手术治疗的甲状腺手术患者68例,按照随机数字表法分为四组,每组17例。麻醉诱导后,A组给予10 ml 0.9%氯化钠溶液,B组给予0.5 mg/kg艾司洛尔,C组给予1 mg/kg艾司洛尔,D组给予1.5 mg/kg艾司洛尔,观察不同给药剂量艾司洛尔对神经监测下甲状腺手术麻醉诱导效果影响情况。

结果

(1)4组患者在诱导前心率、收缩压、舒张压差异无统计学意义;(2)A组、B组在插管时、插管后60、180、300 s的心率值较诱导后均明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),C组在插管后180、300 s的心率值较诱导后升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),D组在插管后300 s的心率值较诱导后升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)C组、D组在插管时、插管后60、180 s的心率值较A组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组、D组在插管时、插管后60 s的收缩压较A组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4) 4组在插管时、插管后的血液流变明显高于麻醉诱导后(P<0.05);(5) 4组间发生窦性心动过缓比率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);艾司洛尔插管后静注阿托品,心动过缓患者最低心率较静注阿托品前差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

不同给药剂量下艾司洛尔可显著抑制甲状腺手术麻醉诱导插管时心血管异常反应,值得临床给予关注。

Objective

To study the effect of esmolol with different concentrations on the induction of anesthesia induced by thyroidectomy.

Methods

A total of sixty-eight thyroid patients diagnosed and surgically treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University from October 2016 to October 2017 were randomly divided into four groups according to the random number table: group A, group B, group C and group D, with 17 cases in each group. After induction of anesthesia, group A was given 10 ml saline, group B 0.5 mg/kg esmolol, group C 1 mg/kg esmolol, and group D 1.5 mg/kg esmolol, to observed effects of different administration of esmolol on induction of anesthesia induced by thyroid surgery under neurological monitoring.

Results

(1) There was no significant difference in heart rate, systolic pressure and diastolic blood pressure among the four groups before induction. (2) In group A and group B, the values of heart rate 60, 180 and 300 s after intubation were significantly increased(P<0.05). The heart rate of group C 180 s and 300 s after intubation was significantly higher than that after induction (P<0.05). After intubation 300 s, the heart rate of group D was higher than that after induction (P<0.05). (3) Heart rate at intubation, 60 s and 180 s after induction in group C, D was lower than group A, while systolic pressure at intubation, 60 s after induction in group C, D was lower than group A, both with significant differences (P<0.05) . (4) In the four groups, the blood rheology after intubation was significantly higher than that after anesthesia induction (P<0.05). (5) There was significant differences in sinus bradycardia among the four groups (P<0.05). Esmolol after intubation was lower in intravenous atropine bradycardia patients with a heart rate than before intravenous atropine (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Esmolol can significantly inhibit abnormal reaction to anesthesia intubation cardiovascular thyroid surgery at different doses, it is worthy of attention.

表1 4组甲状腺手术患者术前一般资料的比较
表2 4组甲状腺手术患者气管插管条件评分的比较[例(%)]
表3 4组甲状腺手术患者各时间点的心率、收缩压、舒张压值比较(方差分析,±s)
表4 4组甲状腺手术患者气管插管期间不良反应的比较[例(%)]
表5 心动过缓患者注射阿托品后心率比较(次/分,±s)
[1]
李琳琳,李龙云,陈鹏, 等. 不同浓度艾司洛尔对神经监测下甲状腺手术麻醉诱导的影响[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2015, 19(2): 226-227.
[2]
廖红霞. 不同剂量罗库溴铵麻醉对甲状腺手术患者术中喉返神经监测的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2015, 13(9): 776-778.
[3]
刘红燕,胡启雅,王翠萍, 等. 不同剂量罗库溴铵对甲状腺手术喉返神经功能监测的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2015, 31(5): 442-444.
[4]
代辉,穆桐,徐云燕, 等. 不同诱导剂量顺式阿曲库铵对老年甲状腺癌患者术中喉返神经监测的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(14): 2227-2229.
[5]
张德山. 维库溴铵麻醉诱导对甲状腺手术喉返神经诱发肌电位的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 65-68.
[6]
Besir A, Cekic B, Kutanis D, et al. Comparison of surgical conditions in 2 different anesthesia techniques of esmolol-induced controlled hypotension in breast reduction surgery[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(10): e6254.
[7]
Asouhidou I, Trikoupi A. Esmolol reduces anesthetic requirements thereby facilitating early extubation; a prospective controlled study in patients undergoing intracranial surgery[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2015, 15(1): 172-173.
[8]
Lee JH, Kim Y, Lee KH, et al. The effects of nicardipine or esmolol on the onset time of rocuronium and intubation conditions during rapid sequence induction: a randomized double-blind trial[J]. J Anesth, 2015, 29(3): 403-408.
[9]
张国华,王健,倪松, 等. 全凭静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对甲状腺手术喉返神经监测的影响[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2017, 46(6): 71-74.
[10]
吴岩,金立民,于童, 等. 丁卡因和利多卡因表面麻醉对于喉返神经监测结节性甲状腺肿伴甲亢患者围拔管期的影响[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2017, 21(4): 668-670.
[11]
张园园,董江涛,代志刚, 等. 不同剂量顺式阿曲库铵对神经外科手术运动诱发电位的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(2): 129-132.
[12]
Chan SM, Lee MS, Lu CH, et al. Confounding factors to predict the awakening effect-site concentration of propofol in target-controlled infusion based on propofol and fentanyl anesthesia[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0124343.
[13]
Sun SH, Yang L, Sun DF, et al. Effects of vasodilator and esmolol-induced hemodynamic stability on early post-operative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients: a randomized trial[J]. Afr Health Sci, 2016, 16(4): 1056-1066.
[14]
唐韬,李婧. 艾司洛尔对腹腔镜胃肠癌根治术患者免疫应激及血流动力学的影响[J].海南医学, 2018, 29(10): 1369-1371, 1372.
[15]
罗昌雄,谭智勇,陈丽娟. 艾司洛尔在甲状腺功能亢进合并快速心律失常患者中的应用研究[J].临床医药实践, 2013,22(12): 883-885.
[16]
黄旭,王展麟,陈海兰, 等. 艾司洛尔对甲状腺功能亢进症患者全身麻醉心血管副反应的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2015, 22(11): 113-115.
[1] 刘茂霞, 张艳兵, 李正达, 金钧, 杨新静. 艾司洛尔对脓毒症大鼠急性心肌损伤的保护作用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 448-453.
[2] 黄东航. 颈前入路充气法单孔腔镜辅助甲状腺微创手术[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 110-110.
[3] 张娜, 易茂林. 微波消融术与甲状腺腺叶切除术对BRAFV600E基因野生型cN0甲状腺微小乳头状癌临床效果对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 9-13.
[4] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
[6] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[7] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[8] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[9] 关善斌, 黄天斌, 王昌泉, 陆柳汕. 经口腔前庭入路行甲状腺癌手术的临床效果观察研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 192-196.
[10] 陈大六, 宋勇罡, 赵海剑, 张晓雨. 三种不同手术入路的腔镜甲状腺癌根治术临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 188-191.
[11] 吴艳乐, 郑伟红, 李会, 张进军. 三种甲状旁腺识别和保护技术的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 87-90.
[12] 梁加亮, 王永永, 张建勇, 赵代伟, 王南鹏, 李翼. 经口腔前庭入路单侧甲状腺癌手术的学习曲线(附48例经验总结)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 549-553.
[13] 闵逸洋, 赵宁, 王沛豪. cT1N0期甲状腺癌三种腔镜术式和开放术式的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 443-446.
[14] 黄海, 蒙建源, 陈福才, 曹玉华, 朱刚健. 免充气腋窝入路腔镜技术与传统方式用于甲状腺次全切除术的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 233-236.
[15] 李正达, 张艳兵, 刘茂霞, 李玉芳, 杨新静. 艾司洛尔对脓毒症肠损伤的保护作用及对自噬蛋白AMPK表达水平的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 90-95.
阅读次数
全文


摘要