切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 265 -268. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.04.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下耻骨肌孔空间分离对全腹膜外疝修补术患者临床效果分析
杨春文1,(), 奚海林2, 周卫华1, 罗文全1, 柴磊1   
  1. 1. 724200 汉中,陕西省汉中市勉县医院外科
    2. 221006 徐州市中心医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-21 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 杨春文

Analysis of clinical effect of laparoscopic separation of pubic skeletal muscle space for patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Chunwen Yang1,(), Hailin Xi2, Weihua Zhou1, Wenquan Luo1, Lei Chai1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Hanzhong City Mianxian Hospital, Hanzhong 724200, China
    2. Department of Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2017-08-21 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunwen Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Chunwen, Email:
引用本文:

杨春文, 奚海林, 周卫华, 罗文全, 柴磊. 腹腔镜下耻骨肌孔空间分离对全腹膜外疝修补术患者临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 265-268.

Chunwen Yang, Hailin Xi, Weihua Zhou, Wenquan Luo, Lei Chai. Analysis of clinical effect of laparoscopic separation of pubic skeletal muscle space for patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 265-268.

目的

研究腹腔镜下耻骨肌孔空间分离在全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中的临床疗效。

方法

选取2015年11月至2017年7月汉中市勉县医院进行TEP手术的90例腹股沟疝患者,按照随机对照表法分为试验组和对照组,各45例。试验组实施腹腔镜下结合耻骨肌孔的空间分离解剖法行TEP,对照组实施单纯腹腔镜TEP,观察并对比两组患者的临床疗效。免疫组织化学SP法分析试验组中基质金属蛋白酶2(MMP-2)组织中的表达和血清中的含量,放射免疫法检测组织中Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原含量。

结果

试验组患者的手术时长、术后的进食时间、术后下床时间和住院时间均低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(t=9.012、4.601、12.306、5.235,均P<0.001);试验组术后慢性疼痛、感觉神经异常、阴囊血肿发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=2.362、1.523、4.987,P=0.017、0.016、0.041);两组均无切口感染;试验组患者手术疗效为优的百分比和优良率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.106,P=0.019)。直疝型MMP-2表达较斜疝型明显增高,差异有统计学意义;与斜疝型相比,直疝型Ⅲ型胶原含量增加,Ⅰ型胶原含量减少,差异有统计学意义(t=5.321、4.936、5.374,P=0.041、0.021、0.031)。

结论

腹腔镜下观察TEP手术空间解剖结构,在耻骨肌孔区域建立4个空间,临床手术疗效好、恢复快、且术后并发症少,值得广泛推广。MMP-2对成人腹股沟疝患者胶原的降解作用与成人腹股沟疝的形成有关联。

Objective

To study the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic supraclavicular myofascial space separation in totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).

Methods

The ninety patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TEP from November 2015 to July 2017 in Hanzhong City Mianxian Hospital were randomly selected. They were divided into test group and control group according to the random comparison table, with 45 cases in each group. The test group underwent laparoscopic TEP combined with the spatial separation and anatomy of the pubic symphysis of the pubis, while the control group received simple laparoscopic TEP. Immunohistochemical SP method and radioimmunoassay analysis was used to measure matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) content and expression of serum tissue in the collagen content medium of the test group (divided into direct inguinal hernia group and indirect inguinal hernia group).

Results

The operation time, eating time, postoperative ambulation time and postoperative hospitalization time after surgery of the test group was lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (t=9.012, 4.601, 12.306, 5.235, all P<0.001). The postoperative chronic pain, sensory nerve abnormalities and the incidence of scrotal hematoma in the test group were significantly lower than those in the control group (χ2=2.362, 1.523, 4.987, P=0.017, 0.016, 0.041). There was no incision infection in the two groups. The test group had better surgical efficacy rate than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.106, P=0.019). Compared with the indirect hernia group, the expression of MMP-2 and type Ⅲ collagen in direct hernia group were significantly higher, the content of the type I collagen in direct hernia group was significantly decreased (t=5.321, 4.936, 5.374, P=0.041, 0.021, 0.031).

Conclusions

TEP shows good curative effect, quick recovery and less postoperative complications of laparoscopic observation in surgical space anatomy to establish four spaces in the pubis muscle area, which is worthy of extensive promotion. The effect of MMP-2 on collagen degradation in adult inguinal hernia is related to the formation of adult inguinal hernia.

表1 两组腹股沟疝患者基本资料的比较
表2 两组腹股沟疝患者术后一般情况的对比(±s
表3 两组患者术后并发症情况对比[例(%)]
表4 试验组中MMP-2蛋白表达水平及胶原含量对比分析(mg/g,±s
[1]
钟涛. 肌耻骨孔在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 医学信息, 2015, 28(25): 38.
[2]
林启谋,李勇,周毅, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后睾丸动脉血流灌注的影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 100-103.
[3]
雷云鹏,何立锐,吕国庆, 等. 肌耻骨孔的空间分离解剖在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用及意义[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6): 19-21.
[4]
王志,张成,尹兴瑞, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术腹膜前间隙的创建[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2016, 21(2): 87-89.
[5]
孙少川,孙中伟. 腔镜腹股沟疝术式选择: TAPP vs.TEP[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2016, 21(2): 85-87.
[6]
华伟,梁志宏,赵象文, 等. 耻骨肌孔的空间分离解剖在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用及意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 32(3): 351-353.
[7]
王鸿波,王华龙,单世胜, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补的临床应用[J]. 河北医学, 2016, 22(12): 1995-1997.
[8]
段建平,罗序超,叶斌, 等. 腹腔镜TAPP和TEP在成人腹股沟疝中的临床应用研究[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2016, 36(2): 228-231.
[9]
李科菀. 40例腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝护理效果观察[J]. 中医临床研究, 2017, 9(6): 123-124.
[10]
Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, et al. Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(3): 378-386.
[11]
Knox RD, Berney CR. A preoperative hernia symptom score predicts inguinal hernia anatomy and outcomes after TEP repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2): 481-486.
[12]
孙艳军,龚仁华,钟兴国, 等. 耻骨肌孔解剖结构对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的意义[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(12): 1193-1195.
[13]
Berney CR, Descallar J. Review of 1 000 fibrin glue mesh fixation during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(10): 1-9.
[14]
孟云潇,李绍杰,唐健雄. 腹股沟疝手术常见并发症的预防及处理[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 73-75.
[15]
阮召杰,廖乘龙,李翰城, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜前疝修补术后并发症分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 247-248.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要