切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 324 -327. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.05.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科在老年结直肠癌患者中的应用
曹明晓1, 姜立新2,(), 胡金晨2, 王东2, 张振彬2, 张孟来2   
  1. 1. 264000 青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院胃肠外二科
    2. 264000 青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院胃肠外一、甲状腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-17 出版日期:2018-10-01
  • 通信作者: 姜立新

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in aged patients undergoing radical colorectal surgery

Mingxiao Cao1, Lixin Jiang2,(), Jinchen Hu2, Dong Wang2, Zhenbin Zhang2, Menglai Zhang2   

  1. 1. The Second Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University-Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
    2. Department of Parenteral and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University-Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
  • Received:2018-01-17 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Lixin Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Lixin, Email:
引用本文:

曹明晓, 姜立新, 胡金晨, 王东, 张振彬, 张孟来. 加速康复外科在老年结直肠癌患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 324-327.

Mingxiao Cao, Lixin Jiang, Jinchen Hu, Dong Wang, Zhenbin Zhang, Menglai Zhang. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in aged patients undergoing radical colorectal surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 324-327.

目的

探讨围手术期中将加速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于老年结直肠癌患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

收集2015年2月至2017年1月烟台毓璜顶医院应用ERAS理念的结直肠癌手术患者的临床资料,共纳入160例患者,根据年龄分为青年组(<65岁,97例)和老年组(≥65岁,63例),对比研究两组患者的胃肠功能恢复情况、术后并发症、术后住院时间。

结果

相对于青年组,老年组患者ASA评分更高(χ2=10.960,P=0.001),并且明显合并更多的基础病(P<0.05)。两组患者手术类型、手术方式以及术后并发症总发生率、严重并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.171、1.039、0.296、0.001,P=0.680、0.595、0.586、0.979)。老年组患者非手术并发症尤其是心血管并发症更常见。青年组患者二次手术率为6.2%,再入院率为5.2%;老年组分别为9.5%、3.2%,两组差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.641、0.041,P=0.433、0.839)。老年组患者肠功能恢复较慢,术后首次肛门排气、术后首次肛门排便、住院时间较青年组患者明显延长(Z=1.89、2.37、3.11,P=0.034、0.013、0.001)。

结论

加速康复外科在老年患者结直肠癌手术中的应用是安全有效的。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)combined with radical colorectal surgery for aged patients with colon cancer or rectal cancer.

Methods

From February 2015 to January 2017, the clinical data of one hundred and sixty patients undergoing radical colorectal cancer surgery combined with ERAS in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital were collected. They were divided into two groups: the young group (< 65 years old, 97 cases) and the elderly group (≥65 years old, 63 cases). The recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay between the two groups were compared.

Results

Compared with the young group, ASA score and the ratio of basic diseases of the elderly patients were higher (χ2=10.960, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the type of operation, the mode of operation, the rate of postoperative complications and the incidence of serious complications between the two groups (χ2=0.171, 1.039, 0.296, 0.001, P=0.680, 0.595, 0.586, 0.979) . Non-operative complications, especially cardiovascular complications, were more common in the elderly patients. The incidence of reoperation and readmission were 6.2%, 5.2% in the young group, and 9.5%, 3.2% in the elderly group respectively, with no statistical differences (χ2=0.641, 0.041, P=0.433, 0.839) . In the elderly group, intestinal function recovery was slower, postoperative anal exhaust, postoperative anal defecation and hospitalization time were significantly longer than those in the young group (Z=1.89, 2.37, 3.11, P=0.034, 0.013, 0.001).

Conclusion

The combination of ERAS and radical colorectal surgery is safe and effective in aged patients with colon cancer or rectal cancer.

表1 160例结直肠癌患者的基本资料
表2 160例结直肠癌患者的根治手术资料比较[例(%),χ2检验]
表3 160例结直肠癌患者术后并发症情况[例(%),χ2检验]
[1]
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001,322(7284):473-476.
[2]
Saklad M, Sellman P. Statistical systems in anesthesiology[J]. Anesthesiology, 1946,7(2):146-160.
[3]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications[J]. Ann Surg, 2004,240(2):205-213.
[4]
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013,37(2):285-305.
[5]
Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H, et al. A comparison in five European Centres of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery[J]. Clin Nutr, 2005,24(3):455-461.
[6]
Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection[J]. Clin Nutr, 2005,24(3):466-477.
[7]
Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations[J]. Arch Surg, 2009,144(10):961-969.
[8]
江志伟,李宁. 结直肠手术应用加速康复外科中国专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015,18(8):785-787.
[9]
Kehlet H, Harling H. Length of stay after laparoscopic colonic surgery--an 11-year nationwide Danish survey[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012,14(9):1118-1120.
[10]
Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH, et al. A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2014,16(12):947-956.
[11]
Baek SJ, Kim SH, Kim SY, et al. The safety of a "fast-track" program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is comparable in older patients as in younger patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013,27(4):1225-1232.
[12]
Verheijen PM, Vd VenAW, Davids PH, et al. Feasibility of enhanced recovery programme in various patient groups[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012,27(4):507-511.
[13]
Kisialeuski M, Pedziwiatr M, Matlok M, et al. Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery in elderly patients[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2015,10(1):30-36.
[14]
Slieker J, Frauche P, Jurt J, et al. Enhanced recovery ERAS for elderly: a safe and beneficial pathway in colorectal surgery[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017,32(2):215-221.
[15]
Pawa N, Cathcart PL, Arulampalam TH, et al. Enhanced recovery program following colorectal resection in the elderly patient[J]. World J Surg, 2012,36(2):415-423.
[16]
李幼生. 加速康复外科:现状及今后需要关注的问题[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017,97(4):244-247.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[14] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[15] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要