新辅助化疗对乳腺癌患者血脂影响及因素分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.01.004

目的

研究新辅助化疗（NAC）对乳腺癌患者血脂水平的影响及相关因素，为降低乳腺癌患者心血管疾病相关死亡率和改善乳腺癌预后提供诊疗依据。

方法

收集整理青岛大学附属医院乳腺诊疗中心299例完成4~6周期化疗的乳腺癌患者临床病理资料及血脂水平结果，分析患者接受NAC前后的血脂水平变化及相关影响因素。

结果

接受NAC后乳腺癌患者血清三酯甘油（TG）、总胆固醇（TC）及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）水平均显著高于术前，而高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）水平低于术前，差异均有统计学意义[（2.26±1.77）mmol/L vs（1.47±1.13）mmol/L、（5.81±1.20）mmol/L vs （5.17±1.07）mmol/L、（3.42±0.89）mmol/L vs （2.87±0.77）mmol/L、（1.28±0.33）mmol/L vs （1.45±0.32）mmol/L，t=-10.02、-9.80、-9.36、9.28，均P<0.01]。单因素分析提示患者肿瘤病理类型（χ²=7.676，P=0.022）及化疗方案（χ²=10.747，P=0.005）是接受NAC后血清TG水平升高的相关因素；患者年龄（χ²=4.065，P=0.044）及是否绝经（χ²=5.134，P=0.023）与NAC后血清LDL-C水平升高相关；血清HDL-C的降低与患者年龄（χ²=7.284，P=0.007）、分子分型（χ²=8.626，P=0.003）及是否绝经（χ²=9.608，P=0.002）有关，而体质量指数（BMI）和化疗疗效与各血脂水平变化无关。多因素分析显示病理类型为浸润性非特殊癌（OR=3.624，P=0.008）及蒽环类联合紫衫类化疗方案（OR=3.508，P=0.001）是影响TG水平升高的独立危险因素；未绝经（OR=2.237，P=0.017）、分子分型为三阴性（OR=3.184，P=0.001）是影响HDL-C水平降低的独立危险因素。

结论

NAC后乳腺癌患者各血脂水平的变化对心血管系统及肿瘤复发、转移等预后不利，临床医师应重视患者血脂代谢变化及相关危险因素，定期检测并及时给予指导干预，降低癌症患者心血管疾病的死亡率并改善预后。

关键词: 乳腺肿瘤, 肿瘤辅助疗法, 血脂异常, 心血管疾病

Objective

To study the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on blood lipid level in patients with breast cancer and to analyze the related factors in order to provide diagnostic and therapeutic basis for reducing the mortality of cardiovascular diseases and improving the prognosis of breast cancer.

Methods

The clinicopathological data and blood lipid levels of two hundred and ninety-nine patients with breast cancer with 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy were collected and analyzed. The changes of blood lipid levels and related factors after NAC were analyzed.

Results

The levels of serum triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in breast cancer patients after NAC treatment were significantly higher than those before NAC, while the levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were lower than those before NAC treatment [(2.26±1.77) mmol/Lvs (1.47±1.13) mmol/L, (5.81±1.20) mmol/L vs (5.17±1.07) mmol/L, (3.42±0.89) mmol/L vs (2.87±0.77) mmol/L, (1.28±0.33) mmol/L vs (1.45±0.32) mmol/L, t=-10.02, -9.80, -9.36, 9.28, all P<0.01]. Univariate analysis showed that pathological type of tumors (χ²=7.676, P=0.022) and chemotherapy regimen (χ²=10.747, P=0.005) were correlated with increased serum TG level after NAC treatment. Age (χ²=4.065, P=0.044) and menopause (χ²=5.134, P=0.023) were correlated with increased serum LDL-C level after NAC treatment. The decrease of serum HDL-C was related to age (χ²=7.284, P=0.007), molecular typing (χ²=8.626, P=0.003) and menopause (χ²=9.608, P=0.002), but BMI and chemotherapy efficacy were not related to the changes of blood lipid levels. Multivariate analysis showed that pathological type of non-specific cancer (OR=3.624, P=0.008) and anthracycline combined paclitaxelt chemotherapy (OR=3.508, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of TG level; premenopause (OR=2.237, P=0.017) and triple-negative molecular typing (OR=3.184, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for the decrease of HDL-C level.

Conclusions

The changes of blood lipid levels of the patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are unfavorable for the prognosis of cardiovascular system and tumor recurrence and metastasis. Clinicians should pay attention to the changes of blood lipid metabolism, regularly detect and give guidance in time to reduce the mortality of cardiovascular diseases and improve the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Neoadjuvant therapy, Dyslipidemias, Cardiovascular diseases

表1 299例乳腺癌患者NAC前后血脂水平比较（mmol/L，）

项目	TG	TC	LDL-C	HDL-C
化疗前	1.47±1.13	5.17±1.07	2.87±0.77	1.45±0.32
化疗后	2.26±1.77	5.81±1.20	3.42±0.89	1.28±0.33
t值	-10.02	-9.80	-9.36	9.28
P值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

表1 299例乳腺癌患者NAC前后血脂水平比较（mmol/L，）

项目	TG	TC	LDL-C	HDL-C
化疗前	1.47±1.13	5.17±1.07	2.87±0.77	1.45±0.32
化疗后	2.26±1.77	5.81±1.20	3.42±0.89	1.28±0.33
t值	-10.02	-9.80	-9.36	9.28
P值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

表2 影响299例乳腺癌患者NAC前后血脂变化的单因素分析[例(%)]

因素		例数	TG升高	χ²值	P值	TC升高	χ²值	P值	LDL-C升高	χ²值	P值	HDL-C降低	χ²值	P值
年龄(岁)
	≤45	101	76(75.2)	0.241	0.623	73(72.3)	2.501	0.114	75(74.3)	4.065	0.044^a	59(58.4)	7.284	0.007^a
	>45	198	154(77.8)	0.241	0.623	125(63.1)	2.501	0.114	124(62.6)	4.065	0.044^a	146(73.7)	7.284	0.007^a
BMI(kg/m²)
	<24	114	90(78.9)	0.425	0.514	75(65.8)	0.015	0.901	77(67.5)	0.081	0.776	81(71.1)	0.530	0.466
	≥24	185	140(75.7)	0.425	0.514	123(66.5)	0.015	0.901	122(65.9)	0.081	0.776	124(67.0)	0.530	0.466
是否绝经
	否	191	150(78.5)	0.773	0.379	134(70.2)	3.663	0.056	136(71.2)	5.134	0.023^a	119(62.3)	9.608	0.002^a
	是	108	80(74.1)	0.773	0.379	64(59.3)	3.663	0.056	63(58.3)	5.134	0.023^a	86(79.6)	9.608	0.002^a
分子分型
	三阴性	41	28(68.3)	1.994	0.158	29(70.7)	0.432	0.511	25(61.0)	0.665	0.415	20(48.8)	8.626	0.003^a
	非三阴性	258	202(78.3)	1.994	0.158	169(65.5)	0.432	0.511	174(67.4)	0.665	0.415	185(71.7)	8.626	0.003^a
病理类型
	特殊癌	26	20(76.9)	7.676	0.022^a	22(84.6)	5.612	0.060	18(69.2)	0.986	0.611	17(65.4)	2.771	0.250
	非特殊癌	249	197(79.1)			158(63.5)			163(65.5)			175(70.3)
	混合型癌	24	13(54.2)			18(75.0)			18(75.0)			13(54.2)
化疗方案
	蒽环类为主	39	22(56.4)	10.747	0.005^a	26(66.7)	0.293	0.864	26(66.7)	0.061	0.970	28(71.8)	1.469	0.480
	蒽环+紫衫类	252	202(80.2)			166(65.9)			168(66.7)			173(68.7)
	紫衫类为主	8	6(75.0)			6(75.0)			5(62.5)			4(50.0)
疗效
	无效	53	43(81.1)	0.643	0.423	37(69.8)	0.371	0.542	36(67.9)	0.054	0.816	41(77.4)	2.313	0.128
	有效	246	187(76.0)	0.643	0.423	161(65.4)	0.371	0.542	163(66.3)	0.054	0.816	164(66.7)	2.313	0.128

表2 影响299例乳腺癌患者NAC前后血脂变化的单因素分析[例(%)]

因素		例数	TG升高	χ²值	P值	TC升高	χ²值	P值	LDL-C升高	χ²值	P值	HDL-C降低	χ²值	P值
年龄(岁)
	≤45	101	76(75.2)	0.241	0.623	73(72.3)	2.501	0.114	75(74.3)	4.065	0.044^a	59(58.4)	7.284	0.007^a
	>45	198	154(77.8)	0.241	0.623	125(63.1)	2.501	0.114	124(62.6)	4.065	0.044^a	146(73.7)	7.284	0.007^a
BMI(kg/m²)
	<24	114	90(78.9)	0.425	0.514	75(65.8)	0.015	0.901	77(67.5)	0.081	0.776	81(71.1)	0.530	0.466
	≥24	185	140(75.7)	0.425	0.514	123(66.5)	0.015	0.901	122(65.9)	0.081	0.776	124(67.0)	0.530	0.466
是否绝经
	否	191	150(78.5)	0.773	0.379	134(70.2)	3.663	0.056	136(71.2)	5.134	0.023^a	119(62.3)	9.608	0.002^a
	是	108	80(74.1)	0.773	0.379	64(59.3)	3.663	0.056	63(58.3)	5.134	0.023^a	86(79.6)	9.608	0.002^a
分子分型
	三阴性	41	28(68.3)	1.994	0.158	29(70.7)	0.432	0.511	25(61.0)	0.665	0.415	20(48.8)	8.626	0.003^a
	非三阴性	258	202(78.3)	1.994	0.158	169(65.5)	0.432	0.511	174(67.4)	0.665	0.415	185(71.7)	8.626	0.003^a
病理类型
	特殊癌	26	20(76.9)	7.676	0.022^a	22(84.6)	5.612	0.060	18(69.2)	0.986	0.611	17(65.4)	2.771	0.250
	非特殊癌	249	197(79.1)			158(63.5)			163(65.5)			175(70.3)
	混合型癌	24	13(54.2)			18(75.0)			18(75.0)			13(54.2)
化疗方案
	蒽环类为主	39	22(56.4)	10.747	0.005^a	26(66.7)	0.293	0.864	26(66.7)	0.061	0.970	28(71.8)	1.469	0.480
	蒽环+紫衫类	252	202(80.2)			166(65.9)			168(66.7)			173(68.7)
	紫衫类为主	8	6(75.0)			6(75.0)			5(62.5)			4(50.0)
疗效
	无效	53	43(81.1)	0.643	0.423	37(69.8)	0.371	0.542	36(67.9)	0.054	0.816	41(77.4)	2.313	0.128
	有效	246	187(76.0)	0.643	0.423	161(65.4)	0.371	0.542	163(66.3)	0.054	0.816	164(66.7)	2.313	0.128

表3 多因素分析影响NAC前后TG变化的危险因素

危险因素		Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
病理类型
	浸润性特殊癌	2.709	2.938	0.820~10.526	0.100
	浸润性非特殊癌	7.003	3.624	1.455~9.023	0.008
化疗方案
	蒽环联合紫衫类	11.646	3.508	1.706~7.214	0.001
	紫衫类为主	1.183	2.655	0.457~15.427	0.277

表3 多因素分析影响NAC前后TG变化的危险因素

危险因素		Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
病理类型
	浸润性特殊癌	2.709	2.938	0.820~10.526	0.100
	浸润性非特殊癌	7.003	3.624	1.455~9.023	0.008
化疗方案
	蒽环联合紫衫类	11.646	3.508	1.706~7.214	0.001
	紫衫类为主	1.183	2.655	0.457~15.427	0.277

表4 多因素分析影响NAC前后HDL-C变化的危险因素

危险因素	Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
≤45岁	1.160	1.389	0.764~2526	0.281
未绝经	5.741	2.237	1.158~4.324	0.017
三阴性乳腺癌	10.305	3.184	1.158~4.324	0.001

表4 多因素分析影响NAC前后HDL-C变化的危险因素

危险因素	Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
≤45岁	1.160	1.389	0.764~2526	0.281
未绝经	5.741	2.237	1.158~4.324	0.017
三阴性乳腺癌	10.305	3.184	1.158~4.324	0.001

表5 多因素分析影响NAC前后LDL-C变化的危险因素

危险因素	Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
≤45岁	1.028	1.379	0.741~2.684	0.311
未绝经	1.922	1.505	0.844~2.566	0.166

表5 多因素分析影响NAC前后LDL-C变化的危险因素

危险因素	Wals值	OR值	95%CI	P值
≤45岁	1.028	1.379	0.741~2.684	0.311
未绝经	1.922	1.505	0.844~2.566	0.166

[1]	Winters S, Martin C, Murphy D, et al. Breast cancer epidemiology, prevention, and screening[J]. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 2017, 151: 1-32.
[2]	郑莹, 吴春晓, 张敏璐. 乳腺癌在中国的流行状况和疾病特征[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2013, 23(8): 561-569.
[3]	于子棋, 肖志, 邬玉辉, 等. 乳腺癌患者化疗前后血脂血糖及体质量指数的变化[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(11): 1502-1505.
[4]	谢敬雄, 范培芝, 张超杰. 乳腺癌化疗前后凝血功能及血脂变化的临床观察[J]. 医学与哲学, 2016, 37(22): 33-35.
[5]	Li X, Liu ZL, Wu YT, et al. Status of lipid and lipoprotein in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2018, 17(1): 91.
[6]	Blackman J, Cabana V, Mazzone T. The acute-phase response and associated lipoprotein abnormalities accompanying lymphoma[J]. J Intern Med, 1993, 233(2): 201-204.
[7]	Nelson ER, Wardell SE, Jasper JS, et al. 27-hydroxycholesterol links hypercholesterolemia and breast cancer pathophysiology[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6162): 1094-1098.
[8]	Sharma M, Tuaine J, Mclaren B, et al. Chemotherapy agents alter plasma lipids in breast cancer patients and show differential effects on lipid metabolism genes in liver cells[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(1): e0148049.
[9]	Yeo W, Mo FKF, Pang E, et al. Profiles of lipids, blood pressure and weight changes among premenopausal Chinese breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[10]	Wulaningsih W, Vahdaninia M, Rowley M, et al. Prediagnostic serum glucose and lipids in relation to survival in breast cancer patients: a competing risk analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15(1): 913.
[11]	Maiti B, Kundranda MN, Spiro TP, et al. The association of metabolic syndrome with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 121(2): 479-483.
[12]	姚宇锋, 唐金海, 秦建伟. 脂质代谢紊乱对乳腺癌复发转移的影响[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2011, 19(12): 2454-2455.
[13]	Bahl M, Ennis M, Tannock IF, et al. Serum lipids and outcome of early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2005, 94(2): 135-144.
[14]	Rodrigues Dos Santos C, Domingues G, Matias I, et al. LDL-cholesterol signaling induces breast cancer proliferation and invasion[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2014, 13(1): 16.
[15]	Li X, Tang H, Wang J, et al. The effect of preoperative serum triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels on the prognosis of breast cancer[J]. Breast, 2017, 32: 1-6.
[16]	Gernaat SAM, Ho PJ, Rijnberg N, et al. Risk of death from cardiovascular disease following breast cancer: a systematic review[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 164(3): 537-555.
[17]	李浩, 孔令泉，吴凯南. 乳腺肿瘤心脏病学的建立及多学科协作的意义[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2018, 11(1): 94-97.

[1]	郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2]	唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3]	康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4]	衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5]	施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6]	伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7]	谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8]	周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9]	熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10]	杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11]	冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12]	康一坤, 袁芃. 三阴性乳腺癌分子遗传学及临床特征研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 290-293.
[13]	王雪菲, 海琳悦, 李立方, 肖春花. Luminal A型乳腺癌的内分泌治疗与化疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 294-300.
[14]	晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[15]	李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Influencing factor analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on blood lipid in patients with breast cancer

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Influencing factor analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on blood lipid in patients with breast cancer