切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 291 -295. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用
马宁1, 于洪燕1, 汤福鑫1, 余卓敏1, 陈嘉林1, 江志鹏1, 李英儒1, 侯泽辉1, 周太成1,(), 陈双1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-19 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 周太成
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2017A020215036); 广州市科技计划项目(201806020036)

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery model in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Ning Ma1, Hongyan Yu1, Fuxin Tang1, Zhuomin Yu1, Jialin Chen1, Zhipeng Jiang1, Yingru Li1, Zehui Hou1, Taicheng Zhou1,(), Shuang Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterogy, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the Sixth Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2019-05-19 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Taicheng Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Taicheng, Email:
引用本文:

马宁, 于洪燕, 汤福鑫, 余卓敏, 陈嘉林, 江志鹏, 李英儒, 侯泽辉, 周太成, 陈双. 加速康复外科模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 291-295.

Ning Ma, Hongyan Yu, Fuxin Tang, Zhuomin Yu, Jialin Chen, Zhipeng Jiang, Yingru Li, Zehui Hou, Taicheng Zhou, Shuang Chen. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery model in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 291-295.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)围手术期中的应用。

方法

选取2017年11月至2018年11月中山大学附属第六医院收治并行腹腔镜经腹腹膜TAPP术的240例患者为研究对象,按照随机分配原则分为ERAS模式组120例和传统模式组120例,记录并比较两组患者术后恶心呕吐发生率、切口疼痛发生率、尿潴留发生率、血清肿发生率、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、正常进食时间、住院天数、住院总费用、患者满意度以及远期随访指标包括疝复发、慢性疼痛、补片感染等。

结果

ERAS模式组患者术后恶心呕吐、切口疼痛、尿潴留的发生率分别为5.00%、3.33%、4.17%,低于传统模式组的15.00%、10.83%、11.67%,两者差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.667、5.128、4.630,P=0.010、0.024、0.031);两组患者血清肿、疝复发、腹股沟区慢性疼痛、补片感染发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.095、0.338、0.204、0.338,P=0.758、0.561、0.651、0.561)。ERAS模式组患者肛门排气时间(6.45±2.12)h、下床活动时间(8.12±2.62)h、正常饮食时间(8.38±2.64)h、住院天数(2.44±0.89)d、住院费用(1.58±0.26)万元均低于传统模式组的(7.28±2.34)h、(12.17±4.35)h、(10.12±2.23)h、(3.78±1.19)d、(1.67±0.25)万元,差异有统计学意义(t=2.880、8.737、5.516、9.878、2.733,均P<0.01)。ERAS组患者满意度(71.67%)高于传统模式组(47.50%),差异有统计学意义(z=4.427, P=0.002)。

结论

ERAS应用于腹腔镜TAPP术中,患者恢复快、并发症少、住院费用低、满意度高,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) model in perioperative period of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).

Methods

From November 2017 to November 2018, two hundred and forty patients with laparoscopic TAPP were enrolled in the Department of Gastroenterogy, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The patients were divided into two groups according to the principle of random distribution, with 120 patients in the ERAS model group and 120 patients in the traditional model group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, incisional pain, urinary retention, and seroma, the time of anal exhaust, off-bed, and eating, hospital stays, the total costs of hospitalization, patient satisfaction, and long-term follow-up indicators including recurrence, chronic pain, and patch infection were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, incisional pain, and urinary retention in the ERAS model group were 5.00%, 3.33%, and 4.17%, respectively, which were lower than the traditional model group of 15.00%, 10.83%, and 11.67%, with statistically significant differences (χ2=6.667, 5.128, 4.630, P=0.010, 0.024, 0.031). There were no significant differences in the incidence of seroma, hernia recurrence, chronic pain in the inguinal region, and patch infection between the two groups (χ2=0.095, 0.338, 0.204, 0.338, P=0.758, 0.561, 0.651, 0.561). In ERAS model group, anal exhaust time, off-bed time, normal diet time, hospital days, hospitalization costs were less than those of the traditional model group, the differences were statistically significant [(6.45±2.12) h vs(7.28±2.34) h, (8.12±2.62) h vs (12.17±4.35) h, (8.38±2.64) h vs (10.12±2.23) h, (2.44±0.89) d vs (3.78±1.19) d, (1.58±0.26) million yuan vs (1.67±0.25) million yuan, t=2.880, 8.737, 5.516, 9.878, 2.733, all P<0.01]. The satisfaction rate in the ERAS model group was 71.67%, higher than that in the traditional model group (47.50%), and the difference was statistically significant (z=4.427, P=0.002).

Conclusion

ERAS applied to TAPP patients is benefit to quick recovery, fewer complications, lower hospitalization costs and higher satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical application.

表1 两组腹股沟疝患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组腹股沟疝患者围手术期的处理流程
表3 两组腹股沟疝患者术后情况的比较
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 1-20.
[2]
Wilmore WD, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001, 322(7284): 473-476.
[3]
Chestovich PJ, Lin AY, Yoo J. Fast-track pathways in colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2013, 93(1): 21-32.
[4]
Hughes MJ, McNally S, Wigmore SJ. Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. HPB, 2014, 16(8): 699-706.
[5]
Muallem MZ, Dimitrova D, Pietzner K, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic oncology. A noggo-ago survey of 144 gynecological departments in Germany[J]. Anticancer Res, 2016, 36(8): 4227-4232.
[6]
陈双. 腹股沟疝腔镜技术培训教材[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2018: 150-164.
[7]
陈双,李英儒. 谈腹股沟疝腔镜的腹膜外修补操作技术[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1227-1229.
[8]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal herniarepair - A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[9]
Nygren J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. Preoperative oral carbohydrate therapy[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2015, 28(3): 364-369.
[10]
Slim K. Laparoscopy within fast-track or within enhanced recovery after surgery?[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(2): e24.
[11]
Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2016, 60(3): 289-334.
[12]
van Rooijen SJ, Huisman D, Stuijvenberg M, et al. Intraoperative modifiable risk factors of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Why surgeons and anesthesiologists should act together[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 36(PtA): 183-200.
[13]
Sun Z, Honar H, Sessler DI, et al. Intraoperative core temperature patterns, transfusion requirement, and hospital duration in patients warmed with forced air[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 122(2): 276-285.
[14]
Torossian A, Brauer A, Hocker J, et al. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(10): 166-172.
[15]
Samoila G, Ford RT, Glasbey JC, et al. The significance of hypothermia in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2017, 38: 323-331.
[16]
侯泽辉,江志鹏,李英儒, 等. 局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后早期疼痛的疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 108-111.
[17]
Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 207(2): 288-292.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要