切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 300 -303. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.04.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

超声引导下局部神经阻滞治疗老年腹股沟疝
武振1, 崔兆清1,(), 王永坤1, 周长鑫1, 孙善平1, 解磐磐1, 姚玉民1, 章阳1   
  1. 1. 252000 山东省聊城市人民医院疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-03 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 崔兆清

A retrospective study on the treatment of inguinal hernia by ultrasound-guided local nerve block

Zhen Wu1, Zhaoqing Cui1,(), Yongkun Wang1, Changxin Zhou1, Shanping Sun1, Panpan Xie1, Yumin Yao1, Yang Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
  • Received:2018-07-03 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhaoqing Cui
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cui Zhaoqing, Email:
引用本文:

武振, 崔兆清, 王永坤, 周长鑫, 孙善平, 解磐磐, 姚玉民, 章阳. 超声引导下局部神经阻滞治疗老年腹股沟疝[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 300-303.

Zhen Wu, Zhaoqing Cui, Yongkun Wang, Changxin Zhou, Shanping Sun, Panpan Xie, Yumin Yao, Yang Zhang. A retrospective study on the treatment of inguinal hernia by ultrasound-guided local nerve block[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 300-303.

目的

探讨超声引导下局部神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝患者无张力修补术中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2016年6月聊城市人民医院收治的64例老年单侧男性腹股沟疝患者,采用超声引导下局部神经阻滞+局部浸润麻醉29例(超声引导组),对比同期体表定位局部神经阻滞+局部浸润麻醉35例(体表定位组),观察两组患者手术过程中麻醉效果、局麻药用量、手术时间、术后疼痛情况及镇痛持续时间、并发症发生率及随访复发率。

结果

所有患者均为60岁以上男性,年龄(67.5±5.3)岁。两组患者手术过程中手术区肌肉松弛,无明显疼痛感,均顺利完成手术。超声引导组术中局麻药用量为(24.3±4.2)ml,体表定位组为(24.8±3.7)ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.491,P=0.625)。超声引导组手术时间为(55.2±10.0)min,体表定位组为(49.3±10.7)min,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.267,P=0.027)。术后1、2 h超声引导组VAS评分(2.3±0.8)分、(1.5±1.0)分,体表定位组分别为(2.6±1.0)分、(1.2±1.1)分,两者比较差异均无统计学意义(t=-1.281、0.728,P=0.205、0.470);术后6 h超声引导组VAS评分为(0.4±0.5)分,显著低于体表定位组的(1.2±0.9)分,差异有统计学意义(t=0.000,P<0.05)。两组患者麻醉满意度评分差异无统计学意义。平均随访(33.5±6.5)个月,无复发、慢性疼痛等术后并发症发生。

结论

超声引导下局部神经阻滞可获得满意的麻醉效果,与体表定位下局部神经阻滞相比,手术时间稍长,但并不增加局麻药的用量,可延长术后镇痛时间,是老年腹股沟疝患者的理想麻醉方式,前景广阔,有待进一步推广。

Objective

To evaluate the application of ultrasound-guided nerve block in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out of sixty-four elderly male patients who had underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair under local nerve block anesthesia from June 2014 to June 2016 in Liaocheng People’s Hospital. Twenty-nine patients undergoing ultrasound-guided nerve block were the ultrasound-guided group, meanwhile the 35 cases undergoing anatomia located nerve block were the anatomia located group. Clinical data including anesthesia effects, anesthesia dosage, operation time, pain scores, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were recorded and analyzed.

Results

All the patients aged over 60 years old, with an average age of (67.5±5.3) years. All operations were completed successfully. The average anesthesia dosage of ultrasound-guided group was (24.3±4.2) mland (24.8±3.7) ml in the anatomia located group, with no significant difference (t=0.491, P=0.625). The average operation time of two groups was (55.2±10.0) min vs (49.3±10.7) min with significant difference (t=2.267, P=0.027). One hour after surgery, the VAS score of the ultrasound-guided group was (2.3±0.8), and two hours after surgery the score was (1.5±1.0), meanwhile the scores of the anatomia located group respectively were (2.6±1.0) and (1.2±1.1), with no statistical significances (t=-1.281, 0.728, P=0.205, 0.470). Six hours after surgery, the VAS scores were (0.4±0.5) vs (1.2±0.9), with statistical significance (t=0.000, P<0.05). There was no difference in anesthesia satisfaction scores between the two groups. No significant postoperative complications were observed in the two groups, with an average follow-up of (33.5± 6.5) months, no recurrence or chronic pain occurred.

Conclusions

Local nerve block guided by ultrasound shows satisfactory anesthetic effects. Compared with local nerve block under body surface localization, it slightly increases operation time, but does not increase the dosage of local anesthetics, which can extend the postoperative analgesia time. Local nerve block guided by ultrasound is an ideal anesthesia in elderly patients with inguinal hernia and needs to be further promoted.

表1 超声引导组与体表定位组腹股沟疝患者局麻药用量及手术时间的比较(±s
表2 超声引导组与体表定位组腹股沟疝患者麻醉满意度评分比较[例(%)]
[1]
唐健雄,陈革,黄磊, 等. 上海地区腹股沟疝发病情况的初步流行病学调查[G]. 上海:中华医学会第十四届全国外科学术会议论文汇编, 2001: 70-71.
[2]
江浩. 开放及腔镜下腹股沟疝腹膜前修补术的比较研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2008.
[3]
陈杰,那冬鸣,申英末, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2005, 20(2): 410-412.
[4]
崔兆清,章阳,孙善平, 等. 局部麻醉下腹膜前间隙修补术在老年腹股沟疝患者中应用体会 [J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(1): 23-25.
[5]
吴江宏. 无张力疝修补术中补片类型的选择对老年腹股沟疝短期疗效及预后的影响[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 96-99.
[6]
杨宁,左明章,孟小燕, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2017, 45(3): 48-51.
[7]
沈亚芳,李泉. 超声引导下髂腹股沟髂腹下神经阻滞用于老年腹股沟疝手术的安全性及有效性探究[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2016, 36(A02): 810-811.
[8]
Tsui B, Suresh S. Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents: A review of current literature and its application in the practice of extremity and trunk blocks[J]. Anesthesiology, 2010, 112(2): 473.
[9]
孟云潇,李绍杰,唐健雄. 腹股沟疝手术常见并发症的预防及处理[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 73-75.
[10]
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 343-403.
[11]
Andersen FH, Nielsen K, Kehlet H. Combined ilioinguinal blockade and local infiltration anaesthesia for groin hernia repair—a double-blind randomized study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 94(4): 520-523.
[12]
宋应寒,雷文章. 腹股沟疝修补术局部浸润麻醉要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 462-463.
[13]
Sanjay P, Woodward A. Inguinal hernia repair: Local or general anaesthesia?[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2007, 89(5): 497-503.
[14]
Berrevoet F, Vanlander A, Bontinck J, et al. Open preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernias using a mesh with nitinol memory frame[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(3): 365-371.
[15]
蒋松松,陈刚,郑黎明, 等. 超声引导局部神经阻滞麻醉下改良腹股沟疝双间隙无张力修补术的临床应用[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2015, 42(9): 594-596.
[16]
Wang Y, Wu T, Terry MJ, et al. Improved perioperative analgesia with ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve or transversus abdominis plane block for open inguinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(3): 1055-1060.
[17]
王涛,黎沾良. 腹股沟疝手术神经损伤的预防和治疗[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2001, 21(2): 68-70.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[3] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[4] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[5] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[6] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[7] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[8] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[9] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[10] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[11] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[12] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要