切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华普通外科学文献(电子版)

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 304 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.04.011

所属专题： 文献；

论著

双孔与单孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗儿童腹股沟疝的对比分析
曹闯1,†(), 吴江1, 黄庆荣1, 麦天赋1   
  1. 1. 524000　湛江，广东医科大学附属医院小儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-21 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 曹闯
  • 基金资助:
    湛江市非资助科技攻关专题(湛科（2017）83号----2017B101)

Comparison of double-site laparoscopic hernia repair and single-site laparoscopic hernia repair in minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernia in children

Chuang Cao1,†(), Jiang Wu1, Qingrong Huang1, Tianfu Mai1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, China
  • Received:2018-07-21 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chuang Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Chuang, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

曹闯, 吴江, 黄庆荣, 麦天赋. 双孔与单孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗儿童腹股沟疝的对比分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 304-307.

Chuang Cao, Jiang Wu, Qingrong Huang, Tianfu Mai. Comparison of double-site laparoscopic hernia repair and single-site laparoscopic hernia repair in minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernia in children[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 304-307.

目的

比较双孔腹腔镜疝修补术（DSLH）与单孔腹腔镜疝修补术（SSLH）在儿童腹股沟疝微创治疗中的疗效。

方法

选取2012年12月至2015年12月间广东医科大学附属医院收治且经B超检查确诊的腹股沟疝患儿178例作为研究对象。其中89例接受DSLH治疗为DSLH组，89例接受SSLH治疗为SSLH组。比较两组患儿的治疗效果（手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、复发率）以及术后并发症的发生情况。

结果

相较DSLH组，SSLH组的手术时间、住院时间显著缩短（t=3.814、4.413，均P<0.001），术后下床活动时间更早（χ2=113.51，P<0.001），术中出血量少（t=4.012，P<0.001）；但是两组患儿的复发率及术后并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.006、0.339，P=0.316、0.560）。

结论

SSLH较DSLH治疗效果更好，值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 疝，腹股沟, 双孔腹腔镜疝修补术, 单孔腹腔镜疝修补术, 疗效
Objective

To compare the efficacy of double-site laparoscopic hernia repair (DSLH) with single-site laparoscopic hernia repair (SSLH) in minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernia in children.

Methods

A total of one hundred and seventy-eight children with inguinal hernia in the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from December 2012 to December 2015 who were confirmed by ultrasound examination were enrolled in this study. Among them, 89 patients who underwent DSLH were divided as the DSLH group, and the other 89 patients underwent SSLH treatment as the SSLH group. The treatment outcomes of the two groups (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, off-bed time, recurrence rates) and the occurrence rate of surgical complications were compared.

Results

In SSLH group, the operation time, hospitalization time, and off-bed time were significantly shortened (t=3.814, 4.413, χ2=113.510, all P<0.001), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was reduced significantly than the patients in the DSLH group (t=4.012, P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence and surgical complications between the two groups (χ2=1.006, 0.339, P=0.316, 0.560).

Conclusion

SSLH can achieve better efficacy than DSLH and it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Double-site laparoscopic hernia repair, Single-site laparoscopic hernia repair, Efficacy
图1 单孔腹腔镜手术操作
图2 双孔腹腔镜手术操作
表1 两组腹股沟疝患儿术前临床资料的比较
组别 例数 年龄(岁，±s) 性别[例(%)] 位置[例(%)]
男 女 左侧 右侧 双侧
SSLH组 89 4.65±1.53 78(87.6) 11(12.4) 19(21.3) 59(66.3) 11(12.4)
DSLH组 89 4.32±1.49 79(88.8) 10(11.2) 20(22.5) 56(62.9) 13(14.6)
统计值 ? t=0.682 χ2=0.054 χ2=0.271
P值 ? 0.491 0.816 0.873
表2 两组腹股沟疝患儿手术情况的比较
组别 例数 手术时间(min，±s) 术中出血量(ml，±s) 下床活动时间[例(%)] 住院时间(d，±s) 复发[例(%)] 对侧隐性疝[例(%)]
<4 h ≥4 h
SSLH组 89 35.4±12.4 3.2±0.7 82(92.1) 7(7.9) 1.43±0.33 0(0) 19(21.3)
DSLH组 89 44.6±13.2 5.7±0.9 11(12.4) 78(87.6) 1.82±0.35 1(1.1) 17(19.1)
统计值 ? t=3.814 t=4.012 χ2=113.510 t=4.413 χ2=1.006 χ2=0.139
P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.316 0.709
表3 两组腹股沟疝患儿术后发生并发症的比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 伤口裂开 电解质紊乱 总并发症发生率
SSLH组 89 1(1.1) 0(0) 1(1.1)
DSLH组 89 1(1.1) 1(1.1) 2(2.2)
χ2值 ? 0.000 1.006 0.339
P值 ? 1.000 0.316 0.560
[3]
Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, et al. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2011, 46(9): 1824-1834.
[4]
Juang D, Fraser JD, Holcomb GW 3rd. The laparoscopic approach for repair of indirect inguinal hernias in infants and children[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2016, 5(4): 222-226.
[5]
Ravikumar V, S R, Kumar HR, et al. A clinical study on the management of inguinal hernias in children on the general surgical practice[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2013, 7(1): 144-147.
[6]
Saka R, Okuyama H, Sasaki T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernias and hydroceles in children: a comparison with traditional open repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(1): 55-58.
[7]
Panabokke G, Clifford ID, Craig SS, et al. Reduction of paediatric inguinal hernias[J]. Emerg Med Australas, 2016, 28(2): 224-227.
[8]
Zani A, Eaton S, Hoellwarth M, et al. Management of pediatric inguinal hernias in the era of laparoscopy: results of an international survey[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2014, 24(1): 9-13.
[9]
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(18): 1819-1827.
[10]
Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, et al. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(5): 1344-1357.
[11]
Hoshino M, Sugito K, Kawashima H, et al. Prediction of contralateral inguinal hernias in children: a prospective study of 357 unilateral inguinal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3): 333-337.
[12]
Wang F, Liu S, Shen Y, et al. A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 15(3): 2896-2900.
[13]
Zhu J, Yu K, Ji Y, et al. Combined open and laparoscopic technique for extraperitoneal mesh repair of large sac inguinal hernias[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(8): 3461-3466.
[14]
Li S, Tang ST, Aubdoollah TH, et al. A modified approach for inguinal hernias in children: hybrid single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal ligation[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(8): 689-693.
[1]
李广，侯东生. 儿童腹股沟斜疝的微创治疗[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 5(5): 436-438.
[2]
Bertozzi M, Magrini E, Appignani A. Preliminary experience with laparoscopic repair of associated inguinal and umbilical hernias in children[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(4): 617-621.
[15]
Shen W, Ji H, Lu G, et al. A modified single-port technique for the minimally invasive treatment of pediatric inguinal hernias with high ligation of the vaginal process: the initial experience[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2010, 169(10): 1207-1212.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10～25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[12] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[13] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[14] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[15] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号