切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 133 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术肠系膜下动脉不同结扎平面对患者预后的影响
周东风1, 柳晓东1, 张强1, 姜朋朋1, 李红梅1,()   
  1. 1. 266011 青岛市市立医院普外二科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-18 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李红梅

Prognosis of rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection with different ligationplanes of inferior mesenteric artery

Dongfeng Zhou1, Xiaodong Liu1, Qiang Zhang1, Pengpeng Jiang1, Hongmei Li1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China
  • Received:2019-12-18 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongmei Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li hongmei, Email:
引用本文:

周东风, 柳晓东, 张强, 姜朋朋, 李红梅. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术肠系膜下动脉不同结扎平面对患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 133-136.

Dongfeng Zhou, Xiaodong Liu, Qiang Zhang, Pengpeng Jiang, Hongmei Li. Prognosis of rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection with different ligationplanes of inferior mesenteric artery[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 133-136.

目的

分析腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中肠系膜下动脉不同结扎平面对患者预后的影响。

方法

选取2007年6月至2014年6月间青岛市市立医院收治的行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术136例患者为研究对象,根据肠系膜下动脉不同的结扎平面,分为保留左结肠动脉的低位结扎组(LL组)76例和不保留左结肠动脉的高位结扎组(HL组)60例。比较两组患者围手术期指标,随访并评价两组的预后。

结果

两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、淋巴结清扫总数和第253组淋巴结清扫个数差异无统计学意义(t=6.109、4.339、8.386、0.233、0.198,P=0.318、0.416、0.512、0.821、0.669);LL组术后吻合口瘘的发生率明显低于HL组(χ2=5.186,P=0.029)。HL组术后3、5年总体生存率分别为80.00%和73.33%,LL组分别为77.63%和72.37%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.536、2.156,P=0.863、0.698)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中肠系膜下动脉不同结扎平面可获得相近的淋巴结清扫效果,保留左结肠动脉的低位结扎平面术后吻合口瘘的发生率更低,其他围手术期指标没有差异,联合第三站中央淋巴结清扫值得应用推广。

Objective

To analyze the influence of different ligation planes of inferior mesenteric artery on the prognosis of rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection.

Methods

The clinical data of one hundred and thirty-six patients with rectal cancer undergoing anterior resection in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from June 2007 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different levels of inferior mesenteric artery ligation, the patients were divided into two groups. Low ligation group (LL) contained 76 patients with left colonic artery preserved, and high ligation group (HL) contained 60 patients with left colonic artery resected. The perioperative indicators and prognosis of the two groups were evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative anal exhaust time, the total number of lymph nodes dissection or the number of No.253 lymph nodes dissection between the two groups (t=6.109, 4.339, 8.386, 0.233, 0.198, P=0.318, 0.416, 0.512, 0.821, 0.669). Compared with HL group, the incidence of anastomotic leakage in LL group was significantly lower (χ2=5.186, P=0.029). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the overall 3, 5-year survival rates with 80.00% and 73.33% in HL group, and 77.63% and 72.37% in LL group respectively (χ2=1.536, 2.156, P=0.863, 0.698).

Conclusions

There is no difference in the efficacy and prognosis between low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery and high ligation surgery in laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. Compared with high ligation surgery, the incidence of anastomotic leakage is lower while other perioperative indicators were the same in low ligation surgery. Therefore, low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery with No.3 central lymph node dissection is worth promoting.

表1 两组直肠癌患者围手术期指标的比较
表2 两组直肠癌患者淋巴结清扫情况比较(枚,±s
图1 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术肠系膜下动脉不同结扎平面患者的总体生存曲线
[1]
申占龙,叶颖江,王彬. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除术的解剖学层面的辨识及其术中并发症的预防[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(7): 744-745.
[2]
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, et al. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: A RCT is needed[J]. Surg Oncol, 2012, 21(3): e111-e123.
[3]
李轶辉,彭浩,许玉春, 等. 保留左结肠动脉在腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中的应用价值[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(7): 1416-1418.
[4]
Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, et al. Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lamphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(7): 1980-1990.
[5]
Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Matthiessen P, et al. High arterial ligation and risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with increased cardiovascular risk[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2015, 17(11): 1018-1027.
[6]
van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR Ⅱ): short-term outcomes of a randomized, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 12(3): 210-218.
[7]
Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, et al. Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): An anatomical study[J]. Int J Colonrectal Dis, 2009, 24(11): 1317-1320.
[8]
Lange JF, Koman N, AkkemanG, et al. Riolan’s arch: confusing misnomer and obsolete. A literature survey of the connection(s) between the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries[J]. Am J Surg, 2007, 193(6): 742-748.
[9]
渠浩,李志霞,杜燕夫, 等. 腹腔镜直肠乙状结肠手术中近端肠管的保护[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(1): 17-18.
[10]
任龙,张云,沈正海. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉与否的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(5): 367-372.
[11]
Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, et al. Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(9): 1178-1185.
[12]
Matsuda K, Hotta T, Takifuji K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery[J]. Br J Surg, 2015, 102(5): 501-508.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要