切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 137 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.02.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜Soave术及Swenson术治疗短段型先天性巨结肠对控便功能的影响
田飞1, 郭朝1, 魏强1,()   
  1. 1. 710003 西安市儿童医院普外二科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 魏强

Effect of laparoscopic Soave and modified laparoscopic Swenson procedures on defecation control in patients with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease

Fei Tian1, Chao Guo1, Qiang Wei1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of General Surgery, Xi’an Children’s Hospital, Xi’an 710003, China
  • Received:2019-01-27 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Qiang, Email:
引用本文:

田飞, 郭朝, 魏强. 腹腔镜Soave术及Swenson术治疗短段型先天性巨结肠对控便功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 137-140.

Fei Tian, Chao Guo, Qiang Wei. Effect of laparoscopic Soave and modified laparoscopic Swenson procedures on defecation control in patients with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 137-140.

目的

探讨腹腔镜Soave术(LS)与改良腹腔镜Swenson术(MLSw)治疗短段型先天性巨结肠(HD)患儿的效果及对控便功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月西安市儿童医院手术治疗的短段型HD患儿90例,其中LS治疗45例(LS组),另外45例采用MLSw治疗(MLSw组)。对比两组患儿的围手术期指标,术后1年时检测患儿的肛肠压,Heikkinen评分法评价其控便功能。

结果

MLSw组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后进食时间、住院时间均少于LS组(t=6.718、15.583、2.183、3.343,均P<0.05)。术后1年时,MLSw组的肛管静息压、肛管高压带长度、最大收缩压、感觉阈值均低于LS组,排便次数、大便性状、污粪、需要治疗及Heikkinen总分均高于LS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MLSw组术后并发症发生率为6.67%(3/45),显著低于LS组的22.22%(10/45),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.406,P=0.036)。

结论

MLSw治疗短段型HD患儿的效果优于LS,患者术后并发症发生率更低,控便功能更好。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic Soave (LS) and modified laparoscopic Swenson (MLSw) on children with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) and the effect on function control.

Methods

Data of ninety children with short-segment HD who underwent surgery from January 2012 to December 2017 in Xi’an Children’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 45 patients with LS (LS group) and 45 patients with MLSw (MLSw group). The perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared. The anorectal pressure of the children was detected at 1 year after operation, and the control function was evaluated by Heikkinen score.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative feeding time and hospitalization time of MLSw group were significantly lower than those of LS group (t=6.718, 15.583, 2.183, 3.343, all P<0.05). One year after operation, the anal canal resting pressure, anal canal pressure band, maximum systolic pressure, and sensory threshold in the MLSw group were lower than those in the LS group, while the number of bowel movement, stool characteristics, feces, need for treatment, and Heikkinen total score were higher, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate was 6.67% (3/45) in the MLSw group, which was significantly lower than 22.22% (10/45) in the LS group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.406, P=0.036).

Conclusion

The effect of MLSw in the treatment of children with short-segment HD is better than LS, with lower operative complication rate and better postoperative function control.

表1 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿的基线资料比较
表2 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿的手术情况对比(±s
表3 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿术后1年的肛肠压测定结果(±s
表4 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿术后1年Heikkinen评分结果(分,±s
[1]
陈芳芳,付晓君,姜磊, 等. 腹腔镜下改良Soave术Ⅰ期治疗小儿长段型先天性巨结肠疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(11): 1846-1848, 1859.
[2]
王世平,段卫星. 腹腔镜辅助下经肛门改良Soave术治疗常见型先天性巨结肠的疗效[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2017, 32(4): 316-317.
[3]
张茜,汤绍涛. 腹腔镜先天性巨结肠症手术操作指南(2017版)解读[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2018, 17(2): 86-89.
[4]
中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南-小儿外科学分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005.
[5]
Widyasari A, Pravitasari WA, Dwihantoro A, et al. Correction to: functional outcomes in Hirschsprung disease patients after transabdominal Soave and Duhamel procedures[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2018, 18(1): 110.
[6]
伍耀豪,曾乐祥,邱荣林, 等. 改良腹腔镜Swenson与Soave术对儿童短段型先天性巨结肠疗效差异[J].实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(12): 2015-2018.
[7]
Tomuschat C, Zimmer J, Puri P. Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through operation for Hirschsprung’s disease: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2016, 32(8): 751-757.
[8]
韩晓强. 腹腔镜辅助下经肛门Soave术治疗先天性巨结肠效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2017, 57(30): 92-94.
[9]
谢崇,李水学,和军, 等. 一期手术与二期手术治疗先天性巨结肠的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 496-504.
[10]
Bing X, Sun C, Wang Z, et al. Transanal pullthrough Soave and Swenson techniques for pediatric patients with Hirschsprung disease[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(10): e6209.
[11]
符策君,董琦,林海, 等. 改良Soave根治术与改良Duhamel根治术治疗小儿先天性巨结肠症的效果[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(18): 66-69.
[12]
金惠明,吴晔明,陈杰. Currarino综合征合并先天性巨结肠病二例报道及文献复习[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2016, 37(9): 691-695.
[13]
张茜,汤绍涛,阳历, 等. 腹腔镜结合肛门外离断技术Duhamel手术治疗先天性巨结肠症的疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2016, 13(4): 31-34.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要