切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 137 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.02.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜Soave术及Swenson术治疗短段型先天性巨结肠对控便功能的影响
田飞1, 郭朝1, 魏强1,()   
  1. 1. 710003 西安市儿童医院普外二科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 魏强

Effect of laparoscopic Soave and modified laparoscopic Swenson procedures on defecation control in patients with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease

Fei Tian1, Chao Guo1, Qiang Wei1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of General Surgery, Xi’an Children’s Hospital, Xi’an 710003, China
  • Received:2019-01-27 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Qiang, Email:
引用本文:

田飞, 郭朝, 魏强. 腹腔镜Soave术及Swenson术治疗短段型先天性巨结肠对控便功能的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 137-140.

Fei Tian, Chao Guo, Qiang Wei. Effect of laparoscopic Soave and modified laparoscopic Swenson procedures on defecation control in patients with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 137-140.

目的

探讨腹腔镜Soave术(LS)与改良腹腔镜Swenson术(MLSw)治疗短段型先天性巨结肠(HD)患儿的效果及对控便功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月西安市儿童医院手术治疗的短段型HD患儿90例,其中LS治疗45例(LS组),另外45例采用MLSw治疗(MLSw组)。对比两组患儿的围手术期指标,术后1年时检测患儿的肛肠压,Heikkinen评分法评价其控便功能。

结果

MLSw组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后进食时间、住院时间均少于LS组(t=6.718、15.583、2.183、3.343,均P<0.05)。术后1年时,MLSw组的肛管静息压、肛管高压带长度、最大收缩压、感觉阈值均低于LS组,排便次数、大便性状、污粪、需要治疗及Heikkinen总分均高于LS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MLSw组术后并发症发生率为6.67%(3/45),显著低于LS组的22.22%(10/45),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.406,P=0.036)。

结论

MLSw治疗短段型HD患儿的效果优于LS,患者术后并发症发生率更低,控便功能更好。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic Soave (LS) and modified laparoscopic Swenson (MLSw) on children with short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) and the effect on function control.

Methods

Data of ninety children with short-segment HD who underwent surgery from January 2012 to December 2017 in Xi’an Children’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 45 patients with LS (LS group) and 45 patients with MLSw (MLSw group). The perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared. The anorectal pressure of the children was detected at 1 year after operation, and the control function was evaluated by Heikkinen score.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative feeding time and hospitalization time of MLSw group were significantly lower than those of LS group (t=6.718, 15.583, 2.183, 3.343, all P<0.05). One year after operation, the anal canal resting pressure, anal canal pressure band, maximum systolic pressure, and sensory threshold in the MLSw group were lower than those in the LS group, while the number of bowel movement, stool characteristics, feces, need for treatment, and Heikkinen total score were higher, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate was 6.67% (3/45) in the MLSw group, which was significantly lower than 22.22% (10/45) in the LS group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.406, P=0.036).

Conclusion

The effect of MLSw in the treatment of children with short-segment HD is better than LS, with lower operative complication rate and better postoperative function control.

表1 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿的基线资料比较
表2 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿的手术情况对比(±s
表3 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿术后1年的肛肠压测定结果(±s
表4 两组短段型先天性巨结肠患儿术后1年Heikkinen评分结果(分,±s
[1]
陈芳芳,付晓君,姜磊, 等. 腹腔镜下改良Soave术Ⅰ期治疗小儿长段型先天性巨结肠疗效观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(11): 1846-1848, 1859.
[2]
王世平,段卫星. 腹腔镜辅助下经肛门改良Soave术治疗常见型先天性巨结肠的疗效[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2017, 32(4): 316-317.
[3]
张茜,汤绍涛. 腹腔镜先天性巨结肠症手术操作指南(2017版)解读[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2018, 17(2): 86-89.
[4]
中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南-小儿外科学分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005.
[5]
Widyasari A, Pravitasari WA, Dwihantoro A, et al. Correction to: functional outcomes in Hirschsprung disease patients after transabdominal Soave and Duhamel procedures[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2018, 18(1): 110.
[6]
伍耀豪,曾乐祥,邱荣林, 等. 改良腹腔镜Swenson与Soave术对儿童短段型先天性巨结肠疗效差异[J].实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(12): 2015-2018.
[7]
Tomuschat C, Zimmer J, Puri P. Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through operation for Hirschsprung’s disease: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2016, 32(8): 751-757.
[8]
韩晓强. 腹腔镜辅助下经肛门Soave术治疗先天性巨结肠效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2017, 57(30): 92-94.
[9]
谢崇,李水学,和军, 等. 一期手术与二期手术治疗先天性巨结肠的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 496-504.
[10]
Bing X, Sun C, Wang Z, et al. Transanal pullthrough Soave and Swenson techniques for pediatric patients with Hirschsprung disease[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(10): e6209.
[11]
符策君,董琦,林海, 等. 改良Soave根治术与改良Duhamel根治术治疗小儿先天性巨结肠症的效果[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(18): 66-69.
[12]
金惠明,吴晔明,陈杰. Currarino综合征合并先天性巨结肠病二例报道及文献复习[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2016, 37(9): 691-695.
[13]
张茜,汤绍涛,阳历, 等. 腹腔镜结合肛门外离断技术Duhamel手术治疗先天性巨结肠症的疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2016, 13(4): 31-34.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[13] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[14] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[15] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
阅读次数
全文


摘要