切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 341 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.05.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术对乳腺癌早期患者的影响观察
王政强1, 韩锋博2,()   
  1. 1. 710018 西安,长安医院普外科
    2. 710018 西安,长安医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-18 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 韩锋博

Effect of improved radical surgery for preserving nipple and areola combined with prosthesis implantation on early breast cancer patients

Zhengqiang Wang1, Fengbo Han2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Chang’an Hospital, Xi’an 710018, China
    2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Chang’an Hospital, Xi’an 710018, China
  • Received:2019-09-18 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Fengbo Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Fengbo, Email:
引用本文:

王政强, 韩锋博. 保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术对乳腺癌早期患者的影响观察[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 341-345.

Zhengqiang Wang, Fengbo Han. Effect of improved radical surgery for preserving nipple and areola combined with prosthesis implantation on early breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 341-345.

目的

探讨保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术对乳腺癌早期患者应对方式及美观效果的影响。

方法

选取2017年3月至2019年3月长安医院收治的乳腺癌早期患者140例,根据手术方案分为研究组与对照组,各70例。研究组采取保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术,对照组采取乳腺癌改良根治术。统计两组手术情况(手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后引流量、住院时间)、并发症(皮下气肿、感染、皮肤坏死、皮下积液、上肢水肿)、美观效果,对比手术前后免疫功能(CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+)、应对方式。

结果

研究组术后引流量少于对照组,住院时间短于对照组(t=13.584、8.423,P<0.001、<0.001)。术后1 d研究组CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+高于对照组(t=6.612、7.057、5.170,均P<0.001)。术后1个月研究组依靠自我、姑息、宿命、逃避评分低于对照组,情感宣泄、寻求支持、乐观、面对评分高于对照组(t=10.821、11.010、7.854、5.952、8.563、9.657、9.223、11.596,均P<0.001)。研究组并发症发生率(5.72%)低于对照组(20.00%)(χ2=6.375,P=0.012),美观效果优良率(92.86%)高于对照组(81.43%)(χ2=4.080,P=0.043)。

结论

保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术治疗乳腺癌早期患者,可减少并发症,改善应对方式,提高美观效果,且对免疫功能影响较小。

Objective

To investigate the effect of modified radical operation for preserving nipple and areola combined with prosthesis implantation on coping style and aesthetic effect of patients with early breast cancer.

Methods

A total of one hundred and forty early breast cancer patients treated in Chang’an Hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were selected and divided into study group and control group, with 70 cases in each group. The study group adopted modified radical operation for preserving nipple and areola combined with prosthesis implantation, while the control group underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. The operation time, number of lymph node dissection, postoperative drainage and hospitalization time, complications (subcutaneous emphysema, infection, skin necrosis, subcutaneous effusion, upper limb edema), aesthetic effect, immune function (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+) and coping style before and after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

The postoperative drainage volume of the study group was less than that of the control group, and the hospital stay was shorter than that of the control group (t=13.584, 8.423, P<0.001, <0.001). CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ of the study group were higher than those of the control group one day after operation (t=6.612, 7.057, 5.170, all P<0.001). One month after surgery, the scores of self-reliance, palliative care, fatalism and escape in the study group were lower than those in the control group, while the scores of emotional catharsis, support seeking, optimism and face-to-face in the study group were higher than those in the control group (t=10.821, 11.010, 7.854, 5.952, 8.563, 9.657, 9.223, 11.596, all P<0.001). The incidence of complications in the study group (5.72%) was lower than that in the control group (20.00%) (χ2=6.375, P=0.012). The excellent rate of aesthetic effect in the study group (92.86%) was higher than that in the control group (81.43%) (χ2=4.080, P=0.043).

Conclusion

Nipple and areola-preserving combined radical mastectomy combined with prosthesis implantation can reduce complications, improve coping styles and aesthetic effects, and have less impact on immune function.

表1 两组乳腺癌早期患者临床资料比较
表2 两组乳腺癌早期患者手术情况的比较(±s)
表3 两组乳腺癌早期患者免疫功能比较(±s)
表4 两组乳腺癌早期患者应对方式比较(±s,分)
表5 两组乳腺癌早期患者术后并发症发生率的比较[例(%)]
[1]
张展强, 袁凯涛, 张德元, 等. 前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的情况分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 16-20.
[2]
于红艳, 曹葆强, 张培松, 等. FTS护理对乳腺癌改良根治术患者负性情绪及术后康复效果的影响[J]. 武警医学, 2019, 30(1): 31-34.
[3]
He S, Yin J, Robb GL, et al. Considering the optimal timing of breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps with adjuvant irradiation in 370 consecutive pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap performed in a Chinese oncology center: is there a significant difference between immediate and delayed[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2017, 78(6): 633-640.
[4]
张敏, 盛华丽. 改良根治术治疗乳腺癌的围术期护理[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(16): 85-87.
[5]
曹勇, 罗杰, 周鑫, 等. 肿瘤整形技术在早期乳腺癌保乳手术中的临床应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(5): 607-613.
[6]
柴丽君, 张学慧. 前锯肌肌瓣在乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造中的应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2017, 31(9): 1098-1101.
[7]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 255-256.
[8]
李展绒, 张永梅. 情志护理对结直肠癌手术患者围手术期应对方式及心境状态的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2016, 38(7): 1105-1107.
[9]
刘梦友, 金功圣, 陈晨, 等. 保留乳头乳晕乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻扩展型背阔肌乳房再造术的临床应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(5): 601-607.
[10]
贾新建, 雷海. 保留胸前神经及肋间臂神经的乳腺癌手术方式的疗效及对术后生活质量的影响[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 208-211.
[11]
Chen K, Liu J, Zhu L, et al. Comparative effectiveness study of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in the general population: a NCDB analysis[J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(37): 40127-40140.
[12]
李萌, 尚进, 杨波, 等. 保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术对患者细胞免疫功能及甲状腺激素水平的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2018, 30(10): 34-38.
[13]
Sim N, Soh S, Ang CH, et al. Breast reconstruction rate and profile in a Singapore patient population: a national university hospital experience[J]. Singapore Med J, 2017, 59(6): 300-304.
[14]
王萌萌, 王京, 华建芬, 等. 保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术联合Ⅰ期假体植入与传统乳腺癌改良根治术的临床疗效对比[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(23): 6040-6043.
[15]
鲁海燕, 张喜平. 香菇多糖对新辅助化疗后乳腺癌患者免疫功能及淋巴细胞的影响[J].安徽医药, 2018, 22(12): 2427-2430.
[16]
Feng HX, Cheng Y, Zhu W, et al. T-lymphocyte subsets as a predictive biomarker for stroke-associated pneumonia[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2018, 10(12): 4367-4375.
[17]
孙萍, 梁栋. 保留乳头乳晕改良根治术联合假体置入术对早中期乳腺癌患者免疫功能及负性情绪的影响[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(4): 453-456.
[18]
徐琳, 杨金旭. 微信式延续护理对乳腺癌术后功能锻炼依从性和生活质量影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(1): 143-146.
[19]
王亚楠, 李平, 叶苓, 等. 互动达标理论在乳腺癌患者术后康复护理中的应用研究[J].重庆医学, 2017, 46(20): 2873-2875.
[20]
石晶晶, 王宗宝. 改良根治术结合即刻乳房再造术对乳腺癌患者预后的影响[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2018, 32(11): 772-775.
[21]
陈淑如, 吴楚成, 颜宁, 等. 保留乳头乳晕改良根治术联合假体置入术治疗早期乳腺癌效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(2): 91-93.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要