切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 32 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

肝细胞癌合并肝门部胆管癌栓与肝门部胆管癌的CT鉴别诊断
梁伟强1, 王猛2, 冯艳青2, 彭振鹏2,()   
  1. 1. 529100 广东省江门市新会中医院放射科
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-16 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 彭振鹏
  • 基金资助:
    院级本科教学质量工程类立项建设子项目(31911130-200422)

CT differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with hilar cholangiocarcinoma thrombus and hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Weiqiang Liang1, Meng Wang2, Yanqing Feng2, Zhenpeng Peng2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Xinhui Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiangmen 529100, China
    2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-05-16 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhenpeng Peng
引用本文:

梁伟强, 王猛, 冯艳青, 彭振鹏. 肝细胞癌合并肝门部胆管癌栓与肝门部胆管癌的CT鉴别诊断[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 32-37.

Weiqiang Liang, Meng Wang, Yanqing Feng, Zhenpeng Peng. CT differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with hilar cholangiocarcinoma thrombus and hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 32-37.

目的

分析肝细胞癌(HCC)合并肝门部胆管癌栓(HBDTT)的CT影像特征,并探讨其与肝门部胆管癌(hilar CC)的CT鉴别诊断。

方法

收集中山大学附属第一医院及江门市新会中医院2013年1月至2018年12月经病理证实的HCC伴HBDTT患者42例(HBDTT组)及hilar CC患者51例(hilar CC组),对两组患者的临床资料及CT影像表现进行比较和分析。

结果

与hilar CC组相比,HBDTT组男性、乙型肝炎病史、上腹部疼痛比例较高,甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平升高更为常见,而hilar CC组CA19-9、癌胚抗原(CEA)升高患者更多(均P<0.05)。两组CT征象在是否同时累及肝实质及胆管、门静脉期"快退"、胆管壁增厚、血管癌栓及脾大等方面差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),5项征象均具有较高的特异度(82.4%~98.0%),其中前3项诊断敏感度较高(100.0%、92.9%、85.7%)。

结论

利用CT可以对HCC合并HBDTT与hilar CC作出准确的鉴别诊断。病变同时累及肝实质和肝门部胆管、门静脉期"快退"及胆管壁不增厚是HCC伴HBDTT的特征性征象,结合乙型肝炎病毒感染、AFP水平升高等综合分析对鉴别HCC伴HBDTT与hilar CC有重要作用。

Objective

To analyze the computed tomography (CT) characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hilar bile duct tumor thrombus (HBDTT) and to investigate the differential imaging features of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hilar CC).

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2018, fourty-two cases with pathologically proved HCC with HBDTT (HBDTT group) and fifty-one cases of hilar CCs (hilar CC group) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Xinhui Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were retrospectively collected. The clinical features and CT findings between the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

Compared with hilar CC group, the proportion of male, hepatitis B history and upper abdominal pain were higher in HBDTT group, and increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were common. However, there were more patients with elevated CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in hilar CC group (P<0.05). On CT imaging characteristics, the presence of both parenchymal lesion with intraductal lesion, washout during the portal venous phase, thickened bile duct wall , intrahepatic vascular embolus, splenomegaly had significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001), all of these five characteristics showed high specificity (82.4%-98.0%), and the first three showed higher sensitivity (100.0%, 92.9%, 85.7%).

Conclusions

CT can be used for accurate differential diagnosis of HCC with HBDTT and hilar CC. The lesion involved both the liver parenchyma and hilar bile duct, washout during portal venous phase and without thickened bile duct wall are characteristic signs of HCC with HBDTT, which are important for the identification of HCC with HBDTT and hilar CC, when combined with hepatitis B virus infection and AFP levels.

表1 HCC伴HBDTT与hilar CC患者临床资料比较
图1 41岁女性肝细胞癌患者CT图像 CT平扫示HCC病灶(短箭头)及HBDTT(长箭头)呈低密度(A);增强扫描动脉期不均匀强化(B);门静脉期呈低密度,胆管壁无增厚(C);D为组织病理图片(苏木精-伊红染色,×200),显示肝细胞癌中等分化
图2 43岁男性肝细胞癌患者CT图像 箭头所示肝门部胆管癌栓;在CT平扫时呈低密度(A);增强扫描动脉期轻度强化,与周围肝实质相比呈等密度(B);门静脉期呈低密度,胆管壁无增厚(C);D为组织病理显示肝细胞癌中等分化(苏木精-伊红染色,×200)
图3 64岁男性肝门部胆管癌患者CT图像 显示胆管壁增厚(箭头所示);平扫呈低密度(A);增强扫描动脉期(B)及门静脉期(C)呈较均匀持续强化;D为组织病理显示胆管癌中-低分化(苏木精-伊红染色,×200)
表2 HCC伴HBDTT与hilar CC患者的CT影像征象对比
表3 HCC伴HBDTT的重要诊断征象效能[例(%)]
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
[2]
Kim DS, Kim BW, Hatano E, et al. Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombus: A Korea-Japan multicenter study[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(5): 913-921.
[3]
梁伟强,蔡华崧,周小琦, 等. 肝细胞癌合并胆管癌栓的CT表现及临床应用价值[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 228-232.
[4]
Joo I, Lee JM, Yoon JH. Imaging diagnosis of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: recent advances and challenges[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(1): 7-13.
[5]
Berretta M, Cavaliere C, Alessandrini L, et al. Serum and tissue markers in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical and prognostic implications[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(8): 14192-14220.
[6]
Koh YX, Lee SY, Chok AY, et al. Icteric intraductal hepatocellular carcinoma and bile duct thrombus masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2016, 45(3): 113-116.
[7]
Choi SH, Lee SS, Kim SY, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma by using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and dynamic CT[J]. Radiology, 2017, 282(3): 771-781.
[8]
Zhao YJ, Chen WX, Wu DS, et al. Differentiation of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: based on the multivariate analysis of contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016, 41(5): 978-989.
[9]
Mao K, Liu J, Sun J, et al. Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31(2): 417-426.
[10]
Navadgi S, Chang CC, Bartlett A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without bile duct thrombus[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2016, 18(4): 312-316.
[11]
Orimo T, Kamiyama T, Yokoo H, et al. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombus, including cases with obstructive jaundice[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(8): 2627-2634.
[12]
Zhou X, Wang J, Tang M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with hilar bile duct tumor thrombus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma on enhanced computed tomography: A diagnostic challenge[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 54.
[13]
Liu QY, Zhang WD, Chen JY, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombus: dynamic computed tomography findings and histopathologic correlation[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2011, 35(2): 187-194.
[14]
Liu QY, Li HG, Gao M, et al. The T1W hyperintense signal on the surface of distal segment of bile duct tumor thrombi and its significance[J]. Acad Radiol, 2012, 19(9): 1141-1148.
[1] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[2] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[3] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[7] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[8] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[9] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[10] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[11] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[12] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[13] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[14] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[15] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
阅读次数
全文


摘要