切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.01.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

三镜联合经腹置入鼻胆管引流术在老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的疗效研究
黄绪兰1, 胡晓月1, 余婷1,()   
  1. 1. 400042 重庆,陆军军医大学大坪医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 余婷
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市卫生计生委医学科研项目(2017ZDXM041)

Effect of three endoscopy combined with transabdominal nasobiliary drainage in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Xulan Huang1, Xiaoyue Hu1, Ting Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital Affiliated to Army Medicine University, Chongqing 400042, China
  • Received:2020-05-12 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ting Yu
引用本文:

黄绪兰, 胡晓月, 余婷. 三镜联合经腹置入鼻胆管引流术在老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 38-42.

Xulan Huang, Xiaoyue Hu, Ting Yu. Effect of three endoscopy combined with transabdominal nasobiliary drainage in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 38-42.

目的

观察腹腔镜联合胆道镜及十二指肠镜经腹置入鼻胆管引流术在老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的疗效并对炎性因子进行分析研究。

方法

选择陆军军医大学大坪医院2019年1月至12月收治的老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者100例,以随机数字表法分为对照组(50例)与试验组(50例),其中试验组患者采取腹腔镜联合胆道镜及十二指肠镜经腹置入鼻胆管引流术,对照组患者采取腹腔镜下胆总管探查取石T管引流。比较两组患者手术情况(手术时间、术中出血量、手术成功率),术后恢复情况(胃肠功能恢复、引流量、引流管留置时间、住院时间),术后并发症情况,治疗前后炎性指标水平。

结果

两组患者术中出血量、手术成功率相比,差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,试验组患者手术时间明显延长(P<0.001),术后胃肠功能恢复时间、引流管留置时间及住院时间明显缩短,术后1、2 d引流量更少(P<0.001)。试验组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(4.00% vs 20.00%,χ2=6.061,P=0.014)。治疗后两组患者的炎性指标水平较治疗前明显降低,且试验组明显低于对照组(P<0.01)。

结论

对于老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,以腹腔镜联合胆道镜及十二指肠镜经腹置入鼻胆管引流术治疗,可明显获得较高的手术成功率,缩短引流管留置时间,减少患者术后并发症和炎性反应,有效缩短患者住院时间,效果理想。

Objective

To observe the effect of the laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope and duodenoscopy in the treatment of elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis, and to analyze the influence on inflammatory factors.

Methods

From January to December 2019, 100 elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were selected and randomly divided into the control group (50 cases) and the trial group (50 cases) from Daping Hospital Affiliated to Army Medicine University. The trial group was treated by laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy and duodenoscopy, and the control group was treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration T-tube drainage. The operation conditions (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, operation success rate), postoperative recovery (gastrointestinal function recovery, drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, hospitalization time), postoperative complications, and inflammatory index levels before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in blood loss and success rate between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the operation time of the trial group was significantly prolonged (P<0.001), the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, the indwelling time of drainage tube and the hospitalization time were significantly shortened, and the drainage volume was less on the 1st and 2nd day after operation (P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications in the trial group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.00% vs 20.00%, χ2=6.061, P=0.014). After treatment, the inflammatory index levels of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the trial group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.01).

Conclusion

In the treatment of elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis, transabdominal placement of nasobiliary drainage through laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope and duodenoscopy can obviously obtain higher success rate of operation, shorten the indwelling time of drainage tube, reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, reduce postoperative inflammatory reaction, effectively shorten the hospitalization time of patients, and the effect is ideal.

表1 两组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者一般资料比较
图2 内镜下十二指肠乳头切开
图4 内镜下球囊清理胆道
表2 两组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者手术情况比较
表3 两组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者术后恢复情况比较(±s
表4 两组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者手术前后血清炎性指标比较(±s
[1]
牛小娟,宋京海. 老年患者胆总管结石的治疗现状与进展[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2017, 36(3): 348-352.
[2]
陈安平,周华波,高原, 等. 同期三镜+气囊鼻胆管引流在胆囊结石合并细径胆总管结石治疗中的应用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2017, 29(4): 293-296.
[3]
Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Wilcox CM. Translational and clinical perspectives on sphincter of Oddi dysfunction[J]. Clin Exp Gastroenterol, 2016, 9: 191-195.
[4]
姬汉书,刘雅刚. 双镜联合同期治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的临床应用研究[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2016, 18(6): 584-585, 588.
[5]
于千乐,余铖. 腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的疗效及对预后的影响[J].现代消化及介入诊疗, 2018, 23(4): 519-521.
[6]
王忠臣,王鑫,孙微微. 腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石疗效观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2016, 10(14): 33-34.
[7]
赵云,杨成林,冯以斌, 等. 十二指肠镜联合腹腔镜治疗老年胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2016, 25(8): 1105-1111.
[8]
宋春. 腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的临床效果观察[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(14): 55-56.
[9]
Bang BW, Lee TH, Song TJ, et al. Twenty-second versus sixty-second dilation duration in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of small common bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial[J]. Clin Endosc, 2015, 48(1): 59-65.
[10]
张新龙,陈智全,刘学军. 腹腔镜经胆囊管胆道探查术治疗肝外胆管结石的疗效分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2017, 29(6): 444-448.
[11]
毛旭南,张培建. 不同术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的应用进展[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 429-433.
[12]
董文亮. 腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜治疗肝外胆管结石合并胆囊结石的临床治疗效果探讨[J]. 中国医药指南, 2019, 17(8): 125-126.
[13]
Lv GY, Qiu W, Yu Y, et al. Development of hepatolithiasis due to a celery stalk retained within the bile ducts of the liver[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2016, 98(5): e77-78.
[14]
张满赐,赵敏. 双镜联合微创治疗老年胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 158-161.
[15]
严骏. 腹腔镜与胆道镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的临床疗效观察[J]. 安徽医药, 2017, 21(12): 2194-2196.
[16]
Hu KC, Chu CH, Wang HY, et al. How does aging affect presentation and management of biliary stones?[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016, 64(11): 2330-2335.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?