切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 116 -119. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

3D腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术流程改良与体会
卢义康1, 刘洪洲1,(), 洪绍忠1, 吕彦东1   
  1. 1. 046000 长治医学院附属和平医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-20 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘洪洲
  • 基金资助:
    山西省服务产业创新学科群建设计划项目(201809)

Improvement and experience of 3D laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection process

Yikang Lu1, Hongzhou Liu1,(), Shaozhong Hong1, Yandong Lyu1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Peace Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China
  • Received:2020-05-20 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongzhou Liu
引用本文:

卢义康, 刘洪洲, 洪绍忠, 吕彦东. 3D腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术流程改良与体会[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 116-119.

Yikang Lu, Hongzhou Liu, Shaozhong Hong, Yandong Lyu. Improvement and experience of 3D laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection process[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 116-119.

目的

探讨3D腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术(APR)的科学流程及相关体会。

方法

回顾性分析长治医学院附属和平医院2016年1月至2018年10月成功行3D腹腔镜APR手术的90例低位直肠癌患者资料。对APR手术流程进行改良:会阴部手术开始于游离直肠后间隙;会阴部与腹部相通时至完整游离切除标本的时间段,与在开始做造口切口时至完成腹膜外造口第Ⅱ步的时间段一致;重建盆底腹膜其后1/3部分+腹膜外造口第Ⅲ步与会阴部的缝合将同步进行完成。

结果

无中转开腹手术,术中出血量为(120.4±41.6)ml,手术时间(165.7±30.5)min。术后首次排气时间为2(1~6) d,住院时间为(14.5±2.3)d;发生切口感染3例,肠粘连和造口旁疝各1例,尿潴留5例,造口水肿1例。90例行3D腹腔镜APR手术患者全部治愈,随访8(6~14)个月,无局部复发和远处转移。

结论

掌握3D腹腔镜APR手术的科学流程,使得腹部与会阴部协调统一,有助于缩短手术时间,增加手术安全性。

Objective

To explore the scientific process and related experience of 3D laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out of ninety patients who successfully underwent 3D laparoscopic APR from January 2016 to October 2018 in the Peace Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College. The procedure of APR was improved: (1) Perineal surgery started by freeing the posterior rectal space. (2) The period from the time when the perineum communicated with the abdomen to the complete free excision of the specimen was the same the time period as stoma incision to the completion of the step of the extraperitoneal stoma. (3) Rebuild the posterior 1/3 of the pelvic peritoneum + extraperitoneal stoma step and the suture of the perineum completed simultaneously.

Results

There was no conversion to open surgery. The intraoperative blood loss was (120.4±41.6) ml and the operation time was (165.7±30.5) min. The first exhaust time was 2 days (1-6 days), and the hospital stay was (14.5±2.3) days. Postoperative infection occurred in three cases, intestinal adhesion in one case, para stomal hernia in one case, urinary retention in five cases, stoma slobber in one case. All the patients were cured by 3D laparoscopic APR surgery. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was found during the follow-up period of 8 (6-14) months.

Conclusion

It is helpful to shorten the operation time, and increase the safety to master the scientific process of 3D laparoscopic APR operation, which makes the abdomen and perineum coordinate and unify.

图1 游离直肠后间隙
图2 会阴部于后方与盆腔相通会合
图3 经腹膜外拖出肠管
图4 封堵会阴部切口以协助腹部操作
图5 检查冲洗腹腔及盆腔
图6 重建盆底腹膜前2/3部分
图7 盆底腹膜重建后1/3部分
图8 腹膜外造口第Ⅲ步
[1]
Tolba MF. Revolutionizing the landscape of colorectal cancer treatment: the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors[J]. Int J Cancer, 2020, 147(11): 2996-3006.
[2]
Rad AH, Aghebati-Maleki L, Kafil HS, et al. Molecular mechanisms of postbiotics in colorectal cancer prevention and treatment[J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2020: 1-17.
[3]
Su H, Jin W, Wang P, et al. Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2019, 12: 669-675.
[4]
Hawkins AT, Albutt K, Wise PE, et al. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer in the twenty-dirst century: indications, techniques, and outcomes[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(8): 1477-1487.
[5]
Ceccarelli G, Costa G, Ferraro V, et al. Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020. Online ahead of print.
[6]
Pantalos G, Patsouras D, Spartalis E, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. In Vivo, 2020, 34(1): 11-21.
[7]
Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908)[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 1971, 21(6): 361-364.
[8]
Chang CC, Lan YT, Jiang JK, et al. Risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing and its impact on prolonged hospital stay after abdominoperineal resection[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17(1): 226.
[9]
李兴旺,李柄辉,马琳璐,等. 3D腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌手术疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(7): 818-827.
[10]
Qi X, Liu M, Tan F, et al. Laparoscopic extralevator abdomino-perineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 71: 158-165.
[11]
Ichikawa N, Homma S, Yoshida T, et al. Proficiency level of novice technically qualified surgeons in laparoscopic rectal resection[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2020, 30(1): 49-54.
[12]
Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Factors that influence the expected length of operation: results of a prospective study[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2012, 21(1): 3-12.
[13]
李兴,李洪亮. 腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术与传统手术治疗低位直肠癌的近期随访比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 158-161.
[14]
Luque-Fernandez MA, Redondo-Sanchez D, Lee SF, et al. Multimorbidity by patient and tumor factors and time-to-surgery among colorectal cancer patients in Spain: A population-based study[J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2020, 12: 31-40.
[15]
Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mine S, et al. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(10): 4279-4285.
[16]
Backes Y, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J, et al. Risk for incomplete resection after macroscopic radical endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017, 112(5): 785-796.
[17]
Wang S, Meng Q, Gao J, et al. The application of extraperitoneal ostomy combined with pelvic peritoneal reconstruction in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019, 2019: 3015958.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[12] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?