切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 282 -287. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2021.04.009

论著

进展期胃癌患者对新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解预测模型构建及价值
张云1, 张瑞奎1, 石娜1, 王晓娜2, 曹甜甜3, 赵冬雨1,()   
  1. 1. 300162 天津,武警特色医学中心特勤急救外科
    2. 100623 北京市普仁医院外科
    3. 100026 北京,武警北京总队医院内三科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24 出版日期:2021-08-03
  • 通信作者: 赵冬雨

Construction and validation of prediction model for pathological complete response of patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Yun Zhang1, Ruikui Zhang1, Na Shi1, Xiaona Wang2, Tiantian Cao3, Dongyu Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Special Emergency Surgery, Special Medical Center of People’s Armed Police Force, Tianjin 300162, China
    2. Department of Surgery, Beijing Puren Hospital, Beijing 100623, China
    3. Department of No.3 Internal Medicine, Beijing General Team Hospital of People’s Armed Police Force, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2021-02-24 Published:2021-08-03
  • Corresponding author: Dongyu Zhao
引用本文:

张云, 张瑞奎, 石娜, 王晓娜, 曹甜甜, 赵冬雨. 进展期胃癌患者对新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解预测模型构建及价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 282-287.

Yun Zhang, Ruikui Zhang, Na Shi, Xiaona Wang, Tiantian Cao, Dongyu Zhao. Construction and validation of prediction model for pathological complete response of patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 282-287.

目的

分析进展期胃癌患者新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解(pCR)的影响因素,并构建pCR的列线图预测模型。

方法

收集2012年1月至2019年12月武警特色医学中心和武警北京总队医院收治的249例进展期胃癌患者的临床资料。利用Logistic回归分析确定影响新辅助化疗后pCR的危险因素。基于危险因素构建预测进展期胃癌患者新辅助化疗后pCR的列线图模型,并使用Bootstrap法进行内部验证。

结果

新辅助化疗后共33例(13.25%)发生pCR。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,癌胚抗原(CEA)水平升高、淋巴细胞比例升高、单核细胞计数低、肿瘤分化程度低是进展期胃癌患者新辅助化疗后pCR的影响因素。使用上述影响构建预测病理完全缓解发生的预测列线图,经Bootstrap法内部验证模型准确性,一致性指数C-index为0.819(95% CI:0.743~0.897)。

结论

本研究构建的预测进展期胃癌患者新辅助化疗pCR的列线图具有较高预测效能,值得临床推广。

Objective

To analyze the influencing factors of pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to construct a nomogram prediction model of pCR.

Methods

The clinical data of 249 patients with AGC admitted to Special Medical Center of Armed Police Force and Beijing General Team Hospital of People’s Armed Police Force fromJanuary 2012 to December 2019 were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Based on the risk factors, a nomogram model was constructed to predict pCR in patients with AGC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and Bootstrap method was used for internal validation.

Results

A total of 33 cases (13.25%) developed pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher CEA level, higher lymphocyte proportion, lower monocyte count and lower tumor differentiation were the influencing factors of pCR in patients with AGC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The accuracy of the model was verified by Bootstrap method, the C-index was 0.819 (95% CI: 0.743-0.897).

Conclusion

The nomogram constructed in this study can be used to predict the pCR of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with AGC, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 进展期胃癌新辅助化疗前资料对比
项目 未缓解组 缓解组 U/χ2 P
例数 216 33    
性别[例(%)]     1.291 0.256
  164(75.93) 28(84.85)    
  52(24.07) 5(15.15)    
年龄(岁) 58(51,65) 59(50,64) 0.577a 0.627
体质指数(kg/m2) 22.26±2.87 22.35±3.51 0.163 0.871
肿瘤位置[例(%)]     5.957 0.114
食管胃交界处 62(28.70) 12(36.36)    
  胃上1/3 24(11.11) 6(18.18)    
  胃中1/3 51(23.61) 2(6.06)    
  胃下1/3 79(36.57) 13(39.39)    
肿瘤分化程度[例(%)]     12.417 0.015
  良好 5(2.31) 4(12.12)    
  中分化 55(25.46) 11(33.33)    
  中-低分化 27(12.50) 7(21.21)    
  低分化 102(47.22) 10(30.30)    
  印戒细胞癌 27(12.50) 1(3.03)    
T分期[例(%)]     0.770 0.678
  T3 106(49.07) 18(54.55)    
  T4a 89(41.20) 11(33.33)    
  T4b 21(9.72) 4(12.12)    
N分期[例(%)]     0.780 0.377
  N0 5(2.31) 0(0.00)    
  N+ 211(97.69) 33(100)    
白细胞(×109/L) 6.49±1.92 5.87±1.48 1.775 0.077
红细胞(×1012/L) 4.41(3.92,4.73) 4.23(3.71,4.49) 1.823a 0.265
中性粒细胞(×109/L) 3.84(2.88,4.99) 3.07(2.59,3.60) 0.663a 0.591
中性粒细胞比例 0.63±0.12 0.59±0.09 1.836 0.068
淋巴细胞×(109/L) 1.62(1.23,2.07) 1.70(1.43,2.09) 2.922*a 0.124
淋巴细胞比例 0.25(0.22,0.35) 0.31(0.27,0.36) 9.897a 0.001
单核细胞(×109/L) 0.52(0.42,0.63) 0.45(0.33,0.56) 5.979a 0.015
单核细胞比例 0.08(0.06,0.11) 0.08(0.07,0.09) 1.775a 0.274
嗜酸性粒细胞(×109/L) 0.14(0.09,0.20) 0.15(0.07,0.21) 0.870a 0.512
嗜酸性粒细胞比例 0.02(0.01,0.03) 0.03(0.02,0.04) 3.791a 0.068
嗜碱性粒细胞(×109/L) 0.03(0.02,0.04) 0.04(0.02,0.05) 0.837a 0.524
嗜碱性粒细胞比例 0.01(0.00,0.01) 0.01(0.00,0.01) 1.723a 0.284
血红蛋白(g/L) 124(98.35,136.02) 119(83.11,135.17) 1.348a 0.368
血小板(×109/L) 260(213.08,331.25) 262(201.72,356.54) 0.152a 0.841
血尿酸(μmol/L) 344(261.90,415.32) 405.31(341.05,480.16) 8.894a 0.002
血肌酐(μmol/L) 77.32(64.88,89.01) 81.09(75.35,89.51) 2.535a 0.162
ALT(U/L) 13.79(9.91,19.02) 14.28(9.69,18.38) 0.039a 0.960
AST(U/L) 18.52(14.84,22.11) 17.02(13.39,22.31) 1.404a 0.354
r-GT(U/L) 18.84(14.59,30.61) 18.57(15.06,34.68) 0.395a 0.711
总蛋白(g/L) 67.95±6.48 70.11±6.29 1.790 0.075
ALB (g/L) 39.62±4.53 41.18±3.64 1.886 0.060
碱性磷酸酶(U/L) 85.57(68.73~100.52) 77.38(58.98,90.77) 2.526a 0.163
前白蛋白(g/L) 0.23±0.07 0.21±0.06 1.556 0.121
TBIL(μmol/L) 11.14(8.87,14.42) 10.51(6.88,16.17) 1.290a 0.383
DBIL(μmol/L) 2.23(1.70,3.13) 2.07(1.45,3.01) 1.791a 0.271
乳酸脱氢酶(U/L) 168(147.78,191.34) 169(149.25,197.53) 0.472a 0.674
胆固醇(mmol/L) 4.74±1.12 5.13±1.05 1.878 0.062
三酰甘油(mmol/L) 1.06(0.85,1.37) 1.17(0.83,1.49) 0.589a 0.622
高密度脂蛋白(mmol/L) 1.15(0.96,1.35) 1.23(1.04,1.43) 3.631a 0.076
低密度脂蛋白(mmol/L) 2.96(2.49,3.48) 3.27(2.90,3.53) 3.575a 0.079
C反应蛋白(mg/L) 2.36(0.93,9.68) 2.16(0.85,5.87) 1.167a 0.417
CA125(U/mL) 15.13(9.54,24.64) 12.45(7.45,21.03) 1.372a 0.362
CEA(μg/L) 2.52(1.37,4.92) 8.05(2.35,26.43) 8.862a 0.002
CA19-9(U/ml) 8.85(2.43,47.48) 15.29(4.43,34.21) 1.653a 0.298
CA153(U/ml) 7.38(5.27,10.75) 8.28(6.16,11.87) 1.582a 0.313
AFP(μg/L) 2.65(1.86,4.20) 2.77(2.04,10.76) 0.728a 0.565
化疗方案[例(%)]     3.286 0.070
  mFLOT 121(56.02) 24(72.73)    
  SOX/FOLFOX/XELOX 95(43.98) 9(27.27)    
化疗周期 4(4,5) 4(4,4) 0.192a 0.818
表2 两组进展期胃癌患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表3 可能影响病理完全缓解的多因素Logistic回归模型
图1 预测新辅助化疗后进展期胃癌患者病理完全缓解的列线图 CEA:<5 μg/L为1;≥5~10 μg/L为2;≥10~15 μg/L为3;≥15~20 μg/L为4;≥20~25 μg/L为5;≥25 μg/L为6;肿瘤分化程度:1为高分化;2为中分化;3为中-低分化;4为低分化;5为印戒细胞癌
[1]
刘颖昊,徐钧. 胃癌新辅助化疗的研究进展[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2019, 31(2): 135-138.
[2]
Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. FLOT4-AIO Investigators. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): A randomised, phase 2/3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10184): 1948-1957.
[3]
王胤奎,王宇宸,陕飞, 等. 基于临床分期探索胃癌新辅助化疗潜在获益人群的单中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(2): 152-157.
[4]
Reddavid R, Sofia S, Chiaro P, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(2): 274-289.
[5]
艾克热木·玉苏甫,阿布都沙拉木·依米提,再依奴尔·阿不都外力, 等. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌的疗效和安全性及费用评估研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(26): 3286-3290.
[6]
彭良群,杨巍,张占东, 等. 21例新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解胃癌患者临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1168-1173.
[7]
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(2): 93-99.
[8]
彭良群,杨巍,张占东, 等. 新辅助化疗治疗局部进展期胃癌的倾向评分匹配法预后分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(10): 1148-1153.
[9]
杜勇,刘亮华,廖海,等. 局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗治疗进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2019, 26(11): 123-130.
[10]
李国立,马龙,相小松. 局部进展期胃癌动静脉结合的术前化疗—临床研究与存在的问题[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2019, 24(1): 23-26.
[11]
陈新华,林周盛,陈粤泓,等. 初始不可切除胃癌转化治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(10):1191-1195.
[12]
彭涛,娄展,张育,等. 紫杉醇联合卡铂新辅助化疗治疗Ⅲ期胃癌的疗效及安全性[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2019, 27(10): 1765-1768.
[13]
Sánchez de Molina ML, Díaz Del Arco C, Vorwald P, et al. Histopathological factors predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric carcinoma[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2018, 20(2): 253-257.
[14]
Wang LB, Teng RY, Jiang ZN, et al. Clinicopathologic variables predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2012, 105(3): 293-296.
[15]
Yao Y, Yuan D, Liu H, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with response to therapy and prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2013, 62(3): 471-479.
[16]
Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2009, 9(3): 162-174.
[17]
侯杰,耿熠,赵亚宁,等. 外周血淋巴细胞绝对值和单核细胞绝对值的比值对胃癌患者预后的预测价值[J]. 癌症进展, 2019, 17(18): 2192-2195.
[18]
Armstrong D, Raissouni S, Price Hiller J, et al. Predictors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: A multicenter study[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2015, 14(4): 291-295.
[19]
Figueiredo C, Camargo MC, Leite M, et al. Pathogenesis of gastric cancer: genetics and molecular classification[J]. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2017, 400: 277-304.
[20]
Neves Filho EH, de Sant’Ana RO, Nunes LV, et al. Histopathological regression of gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: A critical review[J]. APMIS, 2017, 125(2): 79-84.
[1] 孙帼, 谢迎东, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 超声联合临床特征的列线图模型预测甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 734-742.
[2] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[3] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[4] 郑鹏, 吴赛萍, 谢秀璋, 史庆丰. 术前预测感染性肾结石列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 299-306.
[5] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[6] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[7] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[8] 王龙彪, 刘洪, 董天雄. 中心体扩增细胞占比和C反应蛋白-白蛋白比值对胃癌根治术治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 352-356.
[9] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[13] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[14] 王立涛, 刘恩瑞, 李振鲁, 吴昌亮, 高鹏. 基于SEER数据库手术后原发性阑尾肿瘤患者预后列线图构建与验证[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 404-414.
[15] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
阅读次数
全文


摘要