切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 341 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.05.006

论著

腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补术在复发性造口旁疝的应用
曾兵1, 李英儒1, 甘文昌1, 黄恩民1, 侯泽辉1, 马宁1, 江志鹏1, 周太成1,(), 陈双1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科 广东省结直肠盆底疾病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-18 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 周太成
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81973858,82172790); 广东省自然科学基金项目(2019A1515011200); 广东省中医药局科研课题(20211086, 20221094); 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2021061); 广州市基础与应用基础计划(SL2023A04J01589)

Application of laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven-step repair technique in recurrent parastomal hernia

Bing Zeng1, Yingru Li1, Wenchang Gan1, Enmin Huang1, Zehui Hou1, Ning Ma1, Zhipeng Jiang1, Taicheng Zhou1,(), Shuang Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2022-07-18 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Taicheng Zhou
引用本文:

曾兵, 李英儒, 甘文昌, 黄恩民, 侯泽辉, 马宁, 江志鹏, 周太成, 陈双. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补术在复发性造口旁疝的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 341-345.

Bing Zeng, Yingru Li, Wenchang Gan, Enmin Huang, Zehui Hou, Ning Ma, Zhipeng Jiang, Taicheng Zhou, Shuang Chen. Application of laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven-step repair technique in recurrent parastomal hernia[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 341-345.

目的

探讨腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补术在复发性造口旁疝中的应用价值。

方法

收集2017年1月至2021年5月在中山大学附属第六医院行复发性造口旁疝修补术患者的临床资料和手术录像。评价复发性造口旁疝行腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补的可行性,观察术后复发情况,并结合手术录像复盘分析造口旁疝的复发类型、术中和术后并发症以及术后恢复情况等。

结果

共纳入11例复发性乙状结肠造口旁疝病例,均为Sugarbaker术后复发。其中男3例(27.27%),女8例(72.73%),年龄69(66~76)岁,体质指数27.11(24.80~27.55)kg/m2,病程12(4~24)个月。缺损长轴65.99(57.99~88.71)mm,缺损短轴60.96(49.82~87.00)mm。11例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补术,其中腹腔粘连分离时间30(5.50~35.50)min,缺损关闭时间32(25~46)min,总手术时间201(175~251)min,术中出血量20(10~50)ml。通过手术录像复盘,根据补片是否移位,可将造口旁疝复发类型分为补片移位型(9例,81.82%)和非补片移位型(2例,18.18%)。在补片移位型中,根据补片下缘移位的程度分为部分移位型(6例,66.67%)和完全移位型(3例,33.33%)。术后恢复排气时间2(1~4)d,术后住院时间5(4~7)d,无手术部位感染病例。1例术后出现肺部感染,经对症治疗后好转。中位随访时间34.7(27.53~60.40)个月,无复发病例。

结论

复发性造口旁疝再次行手术治疗,腹腔镜Sugarbaker七步法修补术是安全可行的。

Objective

To investigate the value of laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven step repair technique in recurrent parastomal hernia.

Methods

The clinical data and surgical videos of patients who underwent recurrent parastomal hernia repair in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from January 2017 to May 2021 were collected. The completion rate of laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven step repair of recurrent parastomal hernia, the postoperative recurrence, and recurrence type of parastomal hernia, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications and postoperative recovery time were recorded.

Results

A total of 11 cases of recurrent parasigmoid hernia were included, all of which were recurrent after Sugarbaker operation. Among them, 3 cases were male (27.27%), 8 cases were female (72.73%), the median age was 69 (66-76) years old, the median body mass index was 27.11 (24.80-27.55) kg/m2, and the median course of disease was 12 (4-24) months. The long axis of the defect was 65.99 (57.99-88.71) mm, and the short axis of the defect was 60.96 (49.82-87.00) mm. All patients successfully completed the laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven step repair, in which the peritoneal adhesion separation time was 30 (5.50-35.50) minutes, the defect closure time was 32 (25-46) minutes, the total operation time was 201 (175-251) minutes, and the intraoperative bleeding volume was 20 (10-50) ml. The recurrence types of parastomal hernia were summarized by reviewing the operation video. According to whether the mesh was displaced or not, the recurrence types of parastomal hernia could be divided into mesh displacement type (9 cases, 81.82%) and non-mesh displacement type (2 cases, 18.18%). According to the degree of displacement of the lower edge of the mesh, the mesh displacement type could be divided into partial displacement type (6 cases, 66.67%) and complete displacement type (3 cases, 33.33%). The recovery time of exhaust was 2 (1-4) days, and the postoperative hospital stay was 5 (4-7) days. There were no cases of surgical site infection. One patient developed pulmonary infection after operation and improved after treatment. The median follow-up time was 34.7 (25.73-60.40) months, and there was no recurrence.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic Sugarbaker seven step repair technique is safe and feasible for recurrent parastomal hernia.

图1 手术方法 A粘连分离;B缺损缝合;C补片标记;D补片固定
图2 复发类型 A补片移位型,B非补片移位型,C部分移位型,D完全移位型
[1]
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(7): 784-793.
[2]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22: 183-198.
[3]
Makarainen-Uhlback E, Vironen J, Falenius V, et al. Parastomal hernia: A retrospective nationwide cohort study comparing different techniques with long-term follow-up[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45: 1742-1749.
[4]
Lambrecht JR. Diagnostic methods in parastomal hernia; research and clinical relevance[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25: 817-820.
[5]
Odensten C, Strigard K, Rutegard J, et al. Use of Prophylactic mesh when creating a colostomy does not prevent parastomal hernia: A randomized controlled trial-STOMAMESH[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269: 427-431.
[6]
Ebbehoj AL, Sparre P, Jensen KK. Recovery after laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35: 2178-2185.
[7]
Keller P, Totten CF, Plymale MA, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair delays recurrence relative to open repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35: 415-422.
[8]
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255: 685-695.
[9]
Prudhomme M, Fabbro-Peray P, Rullier E, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274: 20-28.
[10]
Lopez-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264: 923-928.
[11]
徐琨,孟相真,杨福全. 造口旁疝的形成机制及手术修补方式研究进展[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 450-454.
[12]
曾兵,李英儒,甘文昌, 等. 腹腔镜切口疝修补术中腹腔粘连的诊断、分型及分离技巧[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(4): 457-464.
[13]
江志鹏,周太成,曾兵, 等. 一种切口疝缝合的创新技术—"立体"缝合[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(2): 160-163.
[14]
马宁,汤福鑫,黄恩民, 等. "对位对线"补片固定法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(4): 474-480.
[15]
Harries RL, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Outcomes of surgically managed recurrent parastomal hernia: the Sisyphean challenge of the hernia world[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25: 133-140.
[16]
傅晓键,姚琪远. 造口旁疝再手术应注意的问题[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 391-394.
[17]
Group APH. Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia: A position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018, 20 Suppl 2: 5-19.
[18]
van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2007, 9 Suppl 2: 25-34.
[19]
Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18: 1-6.
[20]
Liu L, Zheng L, Zhang M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for parastomal hernia with a permanent colostomy[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2022, 126(3): 535-543.
[21]
杨福全. 关于降低造瘘口旁疝修补术后复发率的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 448-449.
[22]
侯泽辉,余卓敏,梁志强, 等. "立体缝合"技术在腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术中的应用疗效[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(4): 465-473.
[1] 蒋宏, 王瑗琪, 肖晗, 梁锐明, 陈淑玲, 周路遥, 陈华东, 钟志海, 匡铭, 刘钧澄. 手术与经皮消融治疗复发性肝母细胞瘤的疗效比较[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 962-967.
[2] 胡欧婵, 黄仲英. 不明原因复发性流产患者的治疗研究现状与展望[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 16-22.
[3] 段东峰, 王成果, 王青, 王健, 惠立良, 莘玮, 杨媛. 两种造口旁疝修补术的临床效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 435-438.
[4] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[5] 方红燕, 刘晓昌, 方家旭. 腹部按压联合综合护理在腹壁造口旁疝患者肠镜检查中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-629.
[6] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[7] 张泽华, 杨诗怡, 熊茂明, 张嘉炜. 腹盆腔脂肪与肌肉含量与Miles术后发生造口旁疝风险的相关性研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 9-14.
[8] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:术前准备和术后处理》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:术前准备和术后处理[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 3-5.
[9] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:手术适应证及禁忌证》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:手术适应证及禁忌证[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 1-2.
[10] 龚泽众, 朱万骥, 任延英, 徐朝辉, 曲慧, Hyok Ju Ri, 张帆, 邵帅, 陈鑫. 预防性放置补片对预防造口旁疝疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 96-104.
[11] 王向, 张永杰. 胆管损伤修复后再狭窄原因与处理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 131-136.
[12] 郑翰, 丁国强, 谢鹏, 卢冰. 切开Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的随访研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 204-211.
[13] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[14] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
[15] 尹建蓝, 陈慧. 易栓症与复发性流产[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 12-17.
阅读次数
全文


摘要